• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协作小组测试对牙科学生在综合护理入门课程中的表现及感知学习的影响。

Effect of Collaborative Group Testing on Dental Students' Performance and Perceived Learning in an Introductory Comprehensive Care Course.

作者信息

Jones Tobie Ann

机构信息

Assistant Professor of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2019 Jan;83(1):88-93. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.011.

DOI:10.21815/JDE.019.011
PMID:30600254
Abstract

The use of collaboration while in dental school can help prepare dental students for the team-oriented nature of the workforce. One way to do this is via collaborative group testing (CGT), a method of assessment allowing students to learn from one another. The aim of this study was to examine the CGT method in a predoctoral dental education setting to determine if student examination performance improved with the addition of collaboration and if collaborative testing was beneficial to students' learning process. In 2016, all first-year dental students (n=76) at one U.S. dental school were assessed in an introductory comprehensive care course using a two-stage CGT in which students were assessed individually, prior to taking the same test in collaboration with an assigned partner. Three quizzes and a final examination were given in which student participants served as both control (individual assessments) and treatment (collaborative assessment). At the conclusion of the course, a questionnaire was administered to ascertain student perspectives. All assessments yielded favorable results with an overall score improvement from a mean of 81.1% on individual assessments to 91% on collaborative assessments (p=0.001), indicating that collaboration improved assessment outcomes. Additionally, retention of material was suggested with individual scores on the cumulative final surpassing average individual scores of the preceding quizzes (p<0.001). Students' responses on the questionnaire indicated that they perceived implementation of CGT was beneficial to their learning process. With these results, this testing methodology shows promise to enhance dental student learning, material retention, and teamwork.

摘要

在牙科学院期间采用协作方式有助于让牙科学生为劳动力队伍的团队导向性质做好准备。一种实现这一目标的方法是通过协作小组测试(CGT),这是一种评估方法,能让学生相互学习。本研究的目的是在博士前牙科教育环境中检验CGT方法,以确定增加协作后学生的考试成绩是否提高,以及协作测试是否对学生的学习过程有益。2016年,美国一所牙科学院的所有一年级牙科学生(n = 76)在一门综合护理入门课程中接受评估,采用两阶段CGT,即学生先单独接受评估,然后与指定的伙伴合作进行相同测试。共进行了三次小测验和一次期末考试,学生参与者既作为对照组(个人评估),也作为实验组(协作评估)。课程结束时,发放了一份问卷以了解学生的看法。所有评估都产生了良好的结果,总体分数从个人评估的平均81.1%提高到协作评估的91%(p = 0.001),表明协作提高了评估结果。此外,累积期末考试的个人成绩超过了之前小测验的个人平均成绩,这表明学生对知识的掌握有所提高(p < 0.001)。学生在问卷上的回答表明,他们认为实施CGT对他们的学习过程有益。基于这些结果,这种测试方法有望提高牙科学生的学习效果、知识掌握程度和团队协作能力。

相似文献

1
Effect of Collaborative Group Testing on Dental Students' Performance and Perceived Learning in an Introductory Comprehensive Care Course.协作小组测试对牙科学生在综合护理入门课程中的表现及感知学习的影响。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Jan;83(1):88-93. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.011.
2
Use of team-based learning pedagogy for predoctoral teaching and learning.基于团队的学习教学法在博士前教学中的应用。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2019 Feb;23(1):e32-e36. doi: 10.1111/eje.12396. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Association Between Dental Student-Developed Exam Questions and Learning at Higher Cognitive Levels.牙科学生编写的考试题目与更高认知水平学习之间的关联
J Dent Educ. 2015 Nov;79(11):1295-304.
4
Implementing an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in dental education: effects on students' learning strategies.在牙科教育中实施客观结构化临床考试(OSCE):对学生学习策略的影响。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2006 Nov;10(4):226-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00421.x.
5
Comparison of Dental Students' Perceived Value of Faculty vs. Peer Feedback on Non-Technical Clinical Competency Assessments.牙科学生对教师与同伴关于非技术临床能力评估反馈的感知价值比较。
J Dent Educ. 2019 May;83(5):536-545. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.056. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
Fostering Dental Students' Academic Achievements and Reflection Skills Through Clinical Peer Assessment and Feedback.通过临床同伴评估和反馈培养牙科学生的学术成就和反思技能。
J Dent Educ. 2016 Aug;80(8):914-23.
7
The effect of frequent quizzes on short- and long-term academic performance.频繁测验对短期和长期学业成绩的影响。
J Dent Educ. 1997 Apr;61(4):339-45.
8
Dental and Dental Hygiene Students' Perceptions of Status Quo, Benefits of, and Curricular Suggestions for Shared Learning: On the Road to IPE?牙科和口腔卫生专业学生对共享学习的现状、益处及课程建议的看法:通往跨专业教育之路?
J Dent Educ. 2019 Mar;83(3):322-333. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.028. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
9
Two-stage collaborative group testing does not improve retention of anatomy among students studying medical radiation technology.两阶段协作式分组检测并未提高医学放射技术专业学生对解剖学知识的掌握程度。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021 Dec;52(4S):S96-S109. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
10
In the students' own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum?用学生自己的话来说:牙科学院课程的优点和缺点是什么?
J Dent Educ. 2007 May;71(5):632-45.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and Evaluating a New Preclinical Curriculum with Focus on Prevention in Dentistry.开发并评估一门专注于牙科预防的新临床前课程。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;13(2):81. doi: 10.3390/dj13020081.
2
Active learning in undergraduate classroom dental education- a scoping review.本科课堂牙医学教育中的主动学习——范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293206. eCollection 2023.
3
Collaborative Testing in Medical Education: Student Perceptions and Long-Term Knowledge Retention.医学教育中的合作测试:学生认知与长期知识保持
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Mar 12;30(2):737-747. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00944-x. eCollection 2020 Jun.