Suppr超能文献

医学教育中的合作测试:学生认知与长期知识保持

Collaborative Testing in Medical Education: Student Perceptions and Long-Term Knowledge Retention.

作者信息

Eastwood Jennifer L, Kleinberg Katherine A, Rodenbaugh David W

机构信息

Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine, Las Cruces, NM USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2020 Mar 12;30(2):737-747. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00944-x. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Collaborative testing blends collaborative learning and assessment, engaging small groups of students in answering exam questions as a team. Previous studies have shown that collaborative testing promotes increased student performance and short-term knowledge retention over individual testing alone. In this mixed-methods study, we examined the effects of collaborative testing on preclinical medical students' long-term retention of basic science knowledge, as well as students' approaches and perceptions of collaborative testing. Small groups of students consecutively experienced two conditions after their individual exams: collaborative testing, where they answered half of the exam questions together, and group exam review, where they discussed the other half of the questions with answers provided. Eight months later, students individually took a post-test that included a subset of the questions they had previously encountered in the context of collaborative testing and a subset of questions from group exam review. We found that both post-test performance and knowledge retained from initial individual exam to post-test were significantly higher for the collaborative testing condition. Qualitative findings suggest that knowledge retention was enhanced by collaborative processes and repeated knowledge retrieval elicited by collaborative testing. While students were appreciative of opportunities to discuss ideas and work as a team, many expressed negative opinions about not being certain of correct answers and experiencing interpersonal conflict in collaborative testing. We discuss implications of these findings to enhance design of collaborative testing opportunities and learning environments that support knowledge retention, productive views of authority and certainty of knowledge, and effective collaborative practice.

摘要

协作测试将协作学习与评估相结合,让一小群学生以团队形式回答考试问题。先前的研究表明,与单独的个人测试相比,协作测试能提高学生的成绩,并增强短期知识留存。在这项混合方法研究中,我们考察了协作测试对临床前医学生基础科学知识长期留存的影响,以及学生对协作测试的方法和看法。在个人考试后,一小群学生依次经历了两种情况:协作测试,即他们一起回答一半的考试问题;小组考试复习,即他们根据提供的答案讨论另一半问题。八个月后,学生们单独参加了一次后测,后测中包含他们之前在协作测试中遇到的一部分问题,以及小组考试复习中的一部分问题。我们发现,协作测试情况下的后测成绩以及从最初的个人考试到后测所留存的知识都显著更高。定性研究结果表明,协作过程以及协作测试引发的重复知识检索增强了知识留存。虽然学生们很感激有机会讨论想法并进行团队合作,但许多人对协作测试中不确定正确答案以及经历人际冲突表达了负面看法。我们讨论了这些发现对于改进协作测试机会和学习环境设计的意义,这些环境应支持知识留存、对权威的建设性看法和知识的确定性,以及有效的协作实践。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
High-Stakes Collaborative Testing: Why Not?高风险协作测试:为何不呢?
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):133-140. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1365719. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
4
Impact of Group Processing on Achievement in Cooperative Groups.小组讨论对合作小组中成绩的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 1990 Aug;130(4):507-516. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1990.9924613.
9
Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65.团队学习:实用指南:AMEE 指南第 65 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e275-87. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验