Williams L Susan, Green Edward L W, Chernoff William A
1 Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
2 Roosevelt University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019 Jun;63(8):1354-1383. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18821090. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
The imperative to heed social environment and power of the situation, particularly as applied to prison settings, dates to the 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment; the widely cited study concluded that situational factors, not personality, created the damaging conditions observed. Despite critical need for research on prison climate, measurement has met stiff challenges, and little research on prison culture exists in the United States. This study applies a 17-item scale, primarily based on Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES), an instrument validated in Australia, Germany, and the United Kingdom. It was administered to inmates and staff in three correctional facilities in the U.S. Midwest, one medium security and two maximum security. Survey results demonstrate higher levels of cohesion at the medium-security facility, but multivariate analysis suggests a much more complex relationship between facility and environment, varying particularly in response to perceived inmate threat. Qualitative data suggest that understanding these associations is vital to building socially adaptive conditions and prosocial change.
关注社会环境和情境力量的必要性,尤其是应用于监狱环境时,可追溯到1971年的斯坦福监狱实验;这项被广泛引用的研究得出结论,是情境因素而非个性创造了所观察到的有害条件。尽管对监狱氛围的研究迫切需要,但测量面临严峻挑战,且美国关于监狱文化的研究很少。本研究应用了一个17项量表,主要基于在澳大利亚、德国和英国得到验证的埃森气候评估量表(EssenCES)。该量表在美国中西部的三个惩教设施中对囚犯和工作人员进行了施测,其中一个是中等安全级别的设施,另外两个是最高安全级别的设施。调查结果显示,中等安全级别的设施凝聚力水平更高,但多变量分析表明设施与环境之间的关系要复杂得多,特别是在应对感知到的囚犯威胁方面存在差异。定性数据表明,理解这些关联对于营造社会适应性条件和亲社会变革至关重要。