Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚全髋关节置换术与人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的实践差异。

Practice variation in total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for treatment of fractured neck of femur in Australia.

机构信息

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2019 Jan;101-B(1):92-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0666.R1.

Abstract

AIMS

Displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) may be treated with partial (hemiarthroplasty, HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA), with recent recommendations advising that THA be used in community-ambulant patients. This study aims to determine the association between the proportion of FNF treated with THA and year of surgery, day of the week, surgeon practice, and private versus public hospitals, adjusting for known confounders.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 67 620 patients in the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) from 1999 to 2016 inclusive were used to generate unadjusted and adjusted analyses of the associations between patient, time, surgeon and institution factors, and the proportion of FNF treated with THA.

RESULTS

Overall, THA was used in 23.7% of patients. THA was more frequently used over time, in younger patients, in healthier patients, in cases performed on weekdays (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.41), in private hospitals (adjusted OR 4.34; 95% CI 3.94 to 4.79) and by surgeons whose hip arthroplasty practice has a relatively higher proportion of elective patients (adjusted OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.49 to 1.83).

CONCLUSION

Practice variation exists in the proportion of FNF patients treated with THA due to variables other than patient factors. This may reflect variation in resources available and surgeon preference, and uncertainty regarding the relative indication.

摘要

目的

股骨颈骨折(FNF)可采用部分(人工股骨头置换术,HA)或全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗,最近的建议建议在社区可走动的患者中使用 THA。本研究旨在确定接受 THA 治疗的 FNF 患者比例与手术年份、手术日、外科医生手术实践以及私人与公立医院之间的关联,同时调整已知混杂因素。

患者和方法

使用澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处(AOANJRR)1999 年至 2016 年期间的 67620 名患者的数据,生成未调整和调整分析,以确定患者、时间、外科医生和机构因素与接受 THA 治疗的 FNF 患者比例之间的关联。

结果

总体而言,THA 用于 23.7%的患者。随着时间的推移,THA 的使用频率更高,在更年轻的患者中,在更健康的患者中,在工作日进行的手术中(调整后的优势比(OR)为 1.27;95%置信区间(CI)为 1.14 至 1.41),在私立医院中(调整后的 OR 为 4.34;95%CI 为 3.94 至 4.79)以及髋关节置换手术实践中相对较高比例的择期患者的外科医生(调整后的 OR 为 1.65;95%CI 为 1.49 至 1.83)。

结论

由于患者因素以外的其他因素,接受 THA 治疗的 FNF 患者比例存在实践差异。这可能反映了资源可用性和外科医生偏好的差异,以及对相对适应症的不确定性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验