• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双动与传统全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折(DISTINCT):一项基于注册登记的、开放性标签、群组随机交叉试验的方案。

Dual mobility versus conventional total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures (DISTINCT): protocol for a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomised crossover trial.

机构信息

Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 21;12(9):e064478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064478.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064478
PMID:36130765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9494585/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) are at high risk of prosthesis instability, and dislocation is the most common indication for revision surgery. This study aims to determine whether dual mobility THA implants reduce the risk of dislocation compared with conventional THA in patients with hip fracture suitable to be treated with THA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a cluster-randomised, crossover, open-label trial nested within the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). The clusters will comprise hospitals that perform at least 12 THAs for hip fracture per annum. All adults age ≥50 years who meet the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry guidelines for THA will be included. The intervention will be dual mobility THA and the comparator will be conventional THA. Each hospital will be allocated to two consecutive periods, one of dual mobility THA and the other of conventional THA in random order, aiming for an average of 16 patients eligible for the primary analysis per group (32 total per site), allowing different recruitment totals between sites. Data will be collected through the AOANJRR and linked with patient-level discharge data acquired through government agencies. The primary outcome is dislocation within 1 year. Secondary outcomes include revision surgery for dislocation and all-cause, complications and mortality at 1, 2 and 5 years. If dual mobility THA is found to be superior, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted. The study will aim to recruit 1536 patients from at least 48 hospitals over 3 years.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been granted (Sydney Local Health District - Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Zone (approval X20-0162 and 2020/ETH00680) and site-specific approvals). Participant recruitment is via an opt-out consent process as both treatments are considered accepted, standard practice. The trial is endorsed by the Australia and New Zealand Musculoskeletal Clinical Trials Network.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12621000069853.

摘要

引言

接受全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗的髋部骨折患者存在假体不稳定的高风险,脱位是翻修手术最常见的指征。本研究旨在确定对于适合接受 THA 治疗的髋部骨折患者,双动髋关节假体与传统 THA 相比是否降低了脱位风险。

方法和分析

这是一项在澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换登记处(AOANJRR)内嵌套的集群随机、交叉、开放标签试验。集群将由每年至少进行 12 例髋部骨折 THA 的医院组成。所有符合澳大利亚和新西兰髋部骨折登记处 THA 指南的 50 岁以上成年人都将被纳入。干预措施将是双动髋关节,对照组将是传统 THA。每个医院将被随机分配到两个连续的时期,一个时期是双动髋关节,另一个时期是传统 THA,平均每个组有 16 名符合主要分析条件的患者(每个地点总共 32 名),允许不同的招募总数。数据将通过 AOANJRR 收集,并与通过政府机构获得的患者水平出院数据进行关联。主要结局是 1 年内脱位。次要结局包括脱位的翻修手术以及 1、2 和 5 年时的所有原因、并发症和死亡率。如果发现双动髋关节具有优势,将进行成本效益分析。该研究将在 3 年内招募至少 48 家医院的 1536 名患者。

伦理和传播

已获得伦理批准(悉尼地方卫生区-皇家阿尔弗雷德王子医院区(批准 X20-0162 和 2020/ETH00680)和特定地点的批准)。参与者的招募是通过选择退出同意的过程,因为两种治疗方法都被认为是可接受的、标准的治疗方法。该试验得到了澳大利亚和新西兰肌肉骨骼临床研究网络的认可。

试验注册编号

ACTRN12621000069853。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ad/9494585/19223168cb66/bmjopen-2022-064478f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ad/9494585/19223168cb66/bmjopen-2022-064478f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ad/9494585/19223168cb66/bmjopen-2022-064478f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Dual mobility versus conventional total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures (DISTINCT): protocol for a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomised crossover trial.双动与传统全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折(DISTINCT):一项基于注册登记的、开放性标签、群组随机交叉试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 21;12(9):e064478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064478.
2
Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.双动杯是否比传统全髋关节置换术设计降低了股骨颈骨折的翻修风险?关节置换登记处的国际荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1912-1925. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002275. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
3
THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.全髋关节置换治疗股骨颈骨折:比较标准头型、大头型、双动和限制性衬垫的翻修率和脱位率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):72-81. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001447.
4
In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.在翻修全髋关节置换术中,双动结构或大直径股骨头假体的再次翻修脱位和无菌性松动风险是否更高?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jun 1;480(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002085. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
5
CRISTAL: protocol for a cluster randomised, crossover, non-inferiority trial of aspirin compared to low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hip or knee arthroplasty, a registry nested study.CRISTAL 方案:一项在髋关节或膝关节置换术中,比较阿司匹林与低分子肝素用于预防静脉血栓栓塞的群组随机、交叉、非劣效性试验的方案,该试验为注册嵌套研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 6;9(11):e031657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031657.
6
Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.对于65岁以下男性,伯明翰髋关节表面置换术的生存率是否优于某些传统髋关节置换术?来自澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Nov;478(11):2625-2636. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001453.
7
Total, hemi, or dual-mobility arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients with neurological disease : analysis of 9,638 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.神经疾病患者股骨颈骨折的全髋关节、半髋关节或双动髋关节置换术治疗:来自瑞典髋关节置换登记处的 9638 例患者分析。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jan;104-B(1):134-141. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B1.BJJ-2021-0855.R1.
8
What Can We Learn From Surgeons Who Perform THA and TKA and Have the Lowest Revision Rates? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.从关节置换术返修率最低的髋关节置换术(THA)和膝关节置换术(TKA)医生身上,我们能学到什么?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Mar 1;480(3):464-481. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002007.
9
Cost-effectiveness of dual-mobility components in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures.双动式髋关节组件在移位型股骨颈骨折患者中的成本效果分析。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Dec;103-B(12):1783-1790. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B12.BJJ-2021-0495.R2.
10
Comparative study of total hip arthroplasties with dual mobility cups versus hemiarthroplasties in management of femoral neck fractures: Survival and dislocation rate at 5 years of follow-up?双动髋臼杯全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的比较研究:5年随访时的生存率和脱位率?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Feb;108(1):103098. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103098. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual-mobIlity verSus conventional Total hip arthroplasty In femoral Neck fractures, a registry-nested, open-label, Cluster-randomized crossover Trial (DISTINCT) : statistical analysis plan.双活动度与传统全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折:一项注册研究嵌套、开放标签、整群随机交叉试验(DISTINCT):统计分析计划
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Aug 4;6(8):866-875. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0042.
2
Data Resource Profile: The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR).数据资源简介:澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处(AOANJRR)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 11;54(4). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaf078.
3
A cost-effectiveness analysis of three surgical options for treating displaced femoral neck fractures in active older patients in Japan: A full economic evaluation.

本文引用的文献

1
The association of surgical approach and bearing size and type with dislocation in total hip arthroplasty for acute hip fracture.手术入路和假体尺寸及类型与急性髋部骨折全髋关节置换术后脱位的相关性研究。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jul;104-B(7):844-851. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1772.R1.
2
Healthcare Costs of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer Patients in the First 12 Months: A Secondary Endpoint Analysis of the Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial (ALaCaRT).腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌患者前 12 个月的医疗成本:澳大利亚腹腔镜直肠癌临床试验(ALaCaRT)的次要终点分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;29(3):1923-1934. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10902-5. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
3
日本活跃老年患者移位股骨颈骨折三种手术治疗方案的成本效果分析:全面经济评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 29;19(10):e0310974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310974. eCollection 2024.
4
May the 4th be with you: mixed-methods best-evidence synthesis on 4th-generation alumina-zirconia ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty.愿原力与你同在:全髋关节置换术中第四代氧化铝-氧化锆陶瓷轴承的混合方法最佳证据综合分析
EFORT Open Rev. 2024 Jul 1;9(7):632-645. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0218.
5
Editorial Comment: Selected Papers from the 10th International Congress of Arthroplasty Registries.编辑评论:来自第10届国际关节置换登记大会的精选论文。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1881-1883. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002371. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
6
CORR Insights®: Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.CORR 见解®:与传统全髋关节置换(THA)设计相比,双动杯能否降低股骨颈骨折的翻修风险?一项来自关节置换登记处的国际荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1926-1928. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002353. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
7
Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.双动杯是否比传统全髋关节置换术设计降低了股骨颈骨折的翻修风险?关节置换登记处的国际荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1912-1925. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002275. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
"True" Cumulative Incidence of and Risk Factors for Hip Dislocation within 2 Years After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Due to Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
"True" 全髋关节置换术后 2 年内因骨关节炎导致髋关节脱位的累积发生率和危险因素:来自丹麦髋关节置换登记处的全国基于人群的研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Feb 17;103(4):295-302. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01352.
4
Low revision rate of dual mobility cups after arthroplasty for acute hip fractures: report of 11,857 hip fractures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007-2019).髋关节置换术后双动杯低返修率:荷兰关节置换登记处(2007-2019 年)11857 例髋部骨折报告。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):36-39. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1845031. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
5
THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.全髋关节置换治疗股骨颈骨折:比较标准头型、大头型、双动和限制性衬垫的翻修率和脱位率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):72-81. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001447.
6
Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗移位型股骨颈骨折:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Sep 16;102(18):1638-1645. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00226.
7
Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility components in patients with a femoral neck fracture.双动组件全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折患者的疗效。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul;102-B(7):811-821. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1486.R1.
8
Study protocol: The DUALITY trial-a register-based, randomized controlled trial to investigate dual mobility cups in hip fracture patients.研究方案:双重性试验——一项基于登记的、随机对照试验,旨在研究髋关节骨折患者中双动杯的应用。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Oct;91(5):506-513. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1780059. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
A tutorial on sample size calculation for multiple-period cluster randomized parallel, cross-over and stepped-wedge trials using the Shiny CRT Calculator.使用 Shiny CRT Calculator 进行多周期群组随机平行、交叉和阶跃楔形试验的样本量计算教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 1;49(3):979-995. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz237.
10
Total Hip Arthroplasty or Hemiarthroplasty for Hip Fracture.全髋关节置换术或髋关节骨折半髋关节置换术。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 5;381(23):2199-2208. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1906190. Epub 2019 Sep 26.