• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于腕戴设备Fitbit Alta与睡眠共识日记之间睡眠追踪的初步协议。

Preliminary Agreement on Tracking Sleep Between a Wrist-Worn Device Fitbit Alta and Consensus Sleep Diary.

作者信息

Liu Jiaxing, Wong Wing To, Zwetsloot Inez Maria, Hsu Yu Cheng, Tsui Kwok Leung

机构信息

Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2019 Dec;25(12):1189-1197. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0202. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1089/tmj.2018.0202
PMID:30601109
Abstract

Background:Sleep is related to various kinds of health outcomes. Many studies traditionally collect data on sleep using questionnaires or sleep diaries. An increasing popular alternative is a wrist-worn device. The accuracy of these devices is uncertain, and assessment of this accuracy is important.

Introduction:The purpose of this study is to compare consensus sleep diary (CSD) and an actigraphy-based wrist-worn device (Fitbit Alta™ [Fitbit, San Francisco, CA]) measurements of total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency, wake time after sleep onset, number of awakenings, and sleep efficiency.

Materials and Methods:Ten healthy young adults (50% female, 100% Asian) in the age range between 20 to 24 years old wore a Fitbit Alta around their nondominated hand during seven consecutive nights. The participants also filled in a CSD every day.

Results:On average, the wrist-worn device (Fitbit Alta) recorded a TST per night of 437.15 min, which is 5.46 min shorter on average than the CSD recorded (442.61 min). Bland-Altman plots indicate that there is large variance in the sleep recorded between Fitbit™ (Fitbit, San Francisco, CA) and CSD. For example, Fitbit recorded 2.15 more awakenings per night than CSD, which is equal to 13.09 min on average longer wake time after sleep onset.

Conclusion:Fitbit and CSD show significant differences in recording sleep. We find that for most sleep metrics, the level of disagreement is small enough for the devices to be interchangeably used except for recording wakes during the night.

摘要

背景

睡眠与多种健康结果相关。传统上,许多研究使用问卷或睡眠日记来收集睡眠数据。一种越来越流行的替代方法是佩戴在手腕上的设备。这些设备的准确性尚不确定,因此评估其准确性很重要。

介绍

本研究的目的是比较共识睡眠日记(CSD)和基于活动记录仪的腕戴设备(Fitbit Alta™[Fitbit,旧金山,加利福尼亚州])在总睡眠时间(TST)、入睡潜伏期、睡眠开始后的觉醒时间、觉醒次数和睡眠效率方面的测量结果。

材料和方法

10名年龄在20至24岁之间的健康年轻成年人(50%为女性,100%为亚洲人)连续七个晚上在非优势手上佩戴Fitbit Alta。参与者每天还填写一份CSD。

结果

平均而言,腕戴设备(Fitbit Alta)记录的每晚TST为437.15分钟,平均比CSD记录的时间短5.46分钟(442.61分钟)。Bland-Altman图表明,Fitbit™(Fitbit,旧金山,加利福尼亚州)和CSD记录的睡眠存在很大差异。例如,Fitbit记录的每晚觉醒次数比CSD多2.15次,这相当于睡眠开始后的觉醒时间平均长13.09分钟。

结论

Fitbit和CSD在记录睡眠方面存在显著差异。我们发现,对于大多数睡眠指标,除了记录夜间觉醒外,设备之间的差异程度足够小,可以互换使用。

相似文献

1
Preliminary Agreement on Tracking Sleep Between a Wrist-Worn Device Fitbit Alta and Consensus Sleep Diary.关于腕戴设备Fitbit Alta与睡眠共识日记之间睡眠追踪的初步协议。
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Dec;25(12):1189-1197. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0202. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
2
Comparing sleep measures in cancer survivors: self-reported sleep diary versus objective wearable sleep tracker.比较癌症幸存者的睡眠测量指标:自我报告的睡眠日记与客观可穿戴睡眠追踪器。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 21;32(9):601. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08788-6.
3
Validation of a Consumer Sleep Wearable Device With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in Adolescents Across Sleep Opportunity Manipulations.在睡眠机会干预下,通过动作活动记录仪和多导睡眠图对青少年消费者睡眠可穿戴设备进行验证。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Sep 15;15(9):1337-1346. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7932.
4
A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults.一项针对成年人的,将Fitbit Charge 2™与多导睡眠图进行比较的验证研究。
Chronobiol Int. 2018 Apr;35(4):465-476. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1413578. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
5
Comparison of multichannel and single-channel wrist-based devices with polysomnography to measure sleep in children and adolescents.多通道和单通道腕部设备与多导睡眠图对比测量儿童和青少年睡眠。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2021 Apr 1;17(4):645-652. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8980.
6
Movement toward a novel activity monitoring device.迈向新型活动监测设备的发展。
Sleep Breath. 2012 Sep;16(3):913-7. doi: 10.1007/s11325-011-0585-y. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
7
Comparing sleep measures in cancer survivors: Self-reported sleep diary versus objective wearable sleep tracker.比较癌症幸存者的睡眠指标:自我报告的睡眠日记与客观可穿戴睡眠追踪器。
Res Sq. 2023 Oct 9:rs.3.rs-3407984. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3407984/v1.
8
Validation of the Sleep-Wake Scoring of a New Wrist-Worn Sleep Monitoring Device.新型腕戴式睡眠监测设备的睡眠-觉醒评分验证。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Jun 15;14(6):1057-1062. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7180.
9
Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.腕戴式Fitbit Flex与腰戴式ActiGraph在测量自由生活成年人步数方面的比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172535. eCollection 2017.
10
Improving Sleep Quality Assessment Using Wearable Sensors by Including Information From Postural/Sleep Position Changes and Body Acceleration: A Comparison of Chest-Worn Sensors, Wrist Actigraphy, and Polysomnography.利用可穿戴传感器通过纳入来自姿势/睡眠体位变化和身体加速度的信息来改善睡眠质量评估:胸部佩戴传感器、腕部活动记录仪和多导睡眠图的比较。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 Nov 15;13(11):1301-1310. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6802.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing sleep measures in cancer survivors: self-reported sleep diary versus objective wearable sleep tracker.比较癌症幸存者的睡眠测量指标:自我报告的睡眠日记与客观可穿戴睡眠追踪器。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 21;32(9):601. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08788-6.
2
Comparing sleep measures in cancer survivors: Self-reported sleep diary versus objective wearable sleep tracker.比较癌症幸存者的睡眠指标:自我报告的睡眠日记与客观可穿戴睡眠追踪器。
Res Sq. 2023 Oct 9:rs.3.rs-3407984. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3407984/v1.
3
Wearable Health Devices for Diagnosis Support: Evolution and Future Tendencies.
可穿戴健康诊断设备:发展与未来趋势。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;23(3):1678. doi: 10.3390/s23031678.
4
Automation of classification of sleep stages and estimation of sleep efficiency using actigraphy.使用活动记录仪自动化睡眠阶段分类和睡眠效率估计。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;10:1092222. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1092222. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluating the Relationship Between Fitbit Sleep Data and Self-Reported Mood, Sleep, and Environmental Contextual Factors in Healthy Adults: Pilot Observational Cohort Study.评估健康成年人中Fitbit睡眠数据与自我报告的情绪、睡眠及环境背景因素之间的关系:初步观察性队列研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Sep 29;4(9):e18086. doi: 10.2196/18086.
6
Accuracy of Wristband Fitbit Models in Assessing Sleep: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腕部 Fitbit 型号设备评估睡眠的准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 28;21(11):e16273. doi: 10.2196/16273.
7
Are sleep patterns influenced by race/ethnicity - a marker of relative advantage or disadvantage? Evidence to date.睡眠模式是否受种族/族裔影响——相对优势或劣势的一个标志?迄今为止的证据。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2019 Jul 23;11:79-95. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S169312. eCollection 2019.