Brain Stimulation and Cognition Lab, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 2;14(1):e0208809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208809. eCollection 2019.
The successful inhibition of sexual thoughts, desires, and behaviors represents an essential ability for adequate functioning in our daily life. Evidence derived from lesion studies indicates a link between sexual inhibition and the general ability for behavioral and cognitive control. This is further supported by the high comorbidity of sexual compulsivity with other inhibition-related disorders. Here, we aimed at investigating whether sexual and general inhibition recruit overlapping or distinct neural correlates in the brain. Furthermore, we investigated the specificity of two different kinds of sexual inhibition: inhibition of sexually driven motor responses and inhibition of sexual incoming information. To this end, 22 healthy participants underwent functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) while performing a task requiring general response inhibition (Go/No-go), as well as cognitive and motivational sexual inhibition (Negative Affective Priming and Approach-Avoidance task). Our within-subject within-session design enabled the direct statistical comparison between general and sexual inhibitory mechanisms. The general inhibition task recruited mainly prefrontal and insular regions, replicating previous findings. In contrast, the two types of sexual inhibition activated both common and distinct neural networks. Whereas cognitive sexual inhibition engaged the inferior frontal gyrus, the orbitofrontal cortex and the fusiform gyrus, motivational sexual inhibition was characterized by a hypoactivation in the anterolateral prefrontal cortex. Both types of sexual inhibition recruited the inferior frontal gyrus and the inferotemporal cortex. However, the activity of the inferior frontal gyrus did not correlate with behavioral inhibitory scores. These results support the hypothesis of inhibitory processing being an emergent property of a functional network.
成功抑制性思想、欲望和行为是我们日常生活中充分发挥功能的重要能力。来自损伤研究的证据表明,性抑制与行为和认知控制的一般能力之间存在联系。这进一步得到了性强迫与其他抑制相关障碍的高共病性的支持。在这里,我们旨在研究性抑制和一般抑制是否在大脑中招募重叠或不同的神经相关物。此外,我们还研究了两种不同类型的性抑制:抑制性驱动的运动反应和抑制性传入信息。为此,22 名健康参与者在执行需要一般反应抑制(Go/No-go)以及认知和动机性性抑制(负性情绪启动和接近回避任务)的任务时接受了功能磁共振成像(fMRI)。我们的内-内-内设计使我们能够在一般和性抑制机制之间进行直接的统计比较。一般抑制任务主要招募了前额叶和脑岛区域,这与之前的发现一致。相比之下,两种类型的性抑制激活了共同和不同的神经网络。认知性性抑制涉及额下回、眶额皮质和梭状回,而动机性性抑制的特征是前外侧前额叶的活动减少。两种类型的性抑制都招募了额下回和下颞叶。然而,额下回的活动与行为抑制评分没有相关性。这些结果支持了抑制处理是功能网络的一种涌现特性的假设。