Suppr超能文献

中文版疼痛量表在伴有疼痛的颞下颌关节紊乱病患者中的核心地位的验证。

Validation of the Centrality of Pain Scale in Chinese-Speaking Patients with Painful Temporomandibular Disorders.

机构信息

College of Stomatology Chongqing Medical University.

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):840-845. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny207.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to validate the Centrality of Pain Scale (COPS) for use in Chinese patients with painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).

METHODS

The Centrality of Pain Scale was firstly translated and cross-culturally adapted following international guidelines. In total, 166 patients with TMD were recruited to complete the Chinese version of the COPS (COPS-C). In addition to the COPS-C, the patients were also administered the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). The reliability of the COPS-C was evaluated using internal consistency and test-retest methods. The construct validity of the COPS-C was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Convergent validity was determined by analyzing the correlations between COPS-C scores and the scores of the PCS and PSEQ.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha for the total COPS-C score was 0.942. The interitem correlations ranged from 0.356 to 0.901. The intraclass correlation coefficient values of the COPS-C ranged between 0.815 and 0.929. The results of the EFA indicated a one-factor solution for the measure, accounting for 70.4% of the total observed variance. The factor loadings of all items ranged from 0.713 to 0.917. Regarding convergent validity, the COPS-C had moderate correlations with the PCS and the PSEQ.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide initial evidence that the COPS-C is a reliable and valid measure. It can be used as a suitable instrument for Chinese patients with TMD.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证疼痛中心量表(COPS)在中国患有疼痛性颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者中的适用性。

方法

首先按照国际指南对疼痛中心量表进行翻译和跨文化适应性调整。共招募 166 名 TMD 患者完成 COPS 的中文版(COPS-C)。除了 COPS-C,患者还完成了疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)和疼痛自我效能问卷(PSEQ)。采用内部一致性和重测法评估 COPS-C 的信度。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)评估 COPS-C 的结构效度。通过分析 COPS-C 评分与 PCS 和 PSEQ 评分之间的相关性来确定其聚合效度。

结果

COPS-C 的总得分的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.942。各条目之间的相关系数范围为 0.356 至 0.901。COPS-C 的组内相关系数值在 0.815 至 0.929 之间。EFA 的结果表明该测量有一个单因素解决方案,占总观察方差的 70.4%。所有条目的因子负荷从 0.713 到 0.917。关于聚合效度,COPS-C 与 PCS 和 PSEQ 具有中度相关性。

结论

结果初步证明 COPS-C 是一种可靠有效的测量工具。它可以作为中国 TMD 患者的合适工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验