• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基台螺丝预紧力及预紧力模拟技术对牙种植体寿命的影响

Effects of abutment screw preload and preload simulation techniques on dental implant lifetime.

作者信息

Satpathy Megha, Jose Rose M, Duan Yuanyuan, Griggs Jason A

机构信息

Biomedical Materials Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.

出版信息

JADA Found Sci. 2022;1. doi: 10.1016/j.jfscie.2022.100010. Epub 2022 May 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfscie.2022.100010
PMID:36704641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9873498/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate how the predicted implant fatigue lifetime is affected by the loss of connector screw preload and the finite element analysis method used to simulate preload.

METHODS

A dental implant assembly (DI1, Biomet-3i external hex; Zimmer Biomet) was scanned using microcomputed tomography and measured using Mimics software (Materialise) and an optical microscope. Digital replicas were constructed using SolidWorks software (Dassault Systèmes). The material properties were assigned in Abaqus (Dassault Systèmes). An external load was applied at 30° off-axial loading. Eight levels of connector screw preload (range, 0-32 Ncm) were simulated for DI1. This assembly and an additional model (DI2) having a longer and narrower screw were compared regarding their fatigue limits (using fe-safe software [Dassault Systèmes]) for 2 preloading methods: (1) adding preload torque or (2) adding bolt axial tension.

RESULTS

The maximum von Mises stresses of DI1 (on the connector screw threads) with and without preload were 439.90 MPa and 587.90 MPa. The predicted fatigue limit was the same for preloads from 100% through 80% of the manufacturers recommendation and dropped precipitously between 80% and 70% preload. Adding a preload torque on the screw resulted in a more uniform stress distribution on the screw compared with bolt axial tension, especially for DI2, which had a longer and narrower screw than DI1.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial loss of preload can be accommodated without compromising the fatigue resistance of this dental implant. Computer models should be constructed using torque instead of a bolt axial tension.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨连接螺钉预紧力的损失以及用于模拟预紧力的有限元分析方法如何影响种植体疲劳寿命的预测。

方法

使用微型计算机断层扫描对牙科种植体组件(DI1,Biomet-3i外六角;Zimmer Biomet)进行扫描,并使用Mimics软件(Materialise)和光学显微镜进行测量。使用SolidWorks软件(达索系统公司)构建数字模型。在Abaqus(达索系统公司)中指定材料属性。在离轴30°方向施加外部载荷。对DI1模拟了八级连接螺钉预紧力(范围为0-32 Ncm)。比较了该组件和另一个具有更长更窄螺钉的模型(DI2)在两种预紧方法下的疲劳极限(使用fe-safe软件[达索系统公司]):(1)添加预紧扭矩或(2)添加螺栓轴向拉力。

结果

有预紧力和无预紧力时DI1(在连接螺钉螺纹上)的最大冯·米塞斯应力分别为439.90 MPa和587.90 MPa。从制造商推荐值的100%到80%的预紧力,预测的疲劳极限相同,而在80%到70%预紧力之间急剧下降。与螺栓轴向拉力相比,在螺钉上添加预紧扭矩会使螺钉上的应力分布更均匀,尤其是对于DI2,其螺钉比DI1更长更窄。

结论

在不影响该牙科种植体抗疲劳性能的情况下,可以承受相当大的预紧力损失。计算机模型应使用扭矩而不是螺栓轴向拉力来构建。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/4e12a81b5762/nihms-1862629-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/221b2517bd15/nihms-1862629-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/6ef5add4824e/nihms-1862629-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/a188317bcc3f/nihms-1862629-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/759d14bc1b9e/nihms-1862629-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/4e12a81b5762/nihms-1862629-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/221b2517bd15/nihms-1862629-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/6ef5add4824e/nihms-1862629-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/a188317bcc3f/nihms-1862629-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/759d14bc1b9e/nihms-1862629-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7929/9873498/4e12a81b5762/nihms-1862629-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of abutment screw preload and preload simulation techniques on dental implant lifetime.基台螺丝预紧力及预紧力模拟技术对牙种植体寿命的影响
JADA Found Sci. 2022;1. doi: 10.1016/j.jfscie.2022.100010. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
The dynamic natures of implant loading.种植体加载的动态特性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jun;101(6):359-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60079-2.
3
Effect of Bone Remodeling on Dental Implant Fatigue Limit Predicted Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.使用三维有限元分析预测骨重塑对牙种植体疲劳极限的影响。
J Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2022;2(1). doi: 10.54289/jdoe2200102. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.外六角与莫氏锥度种植体基台螺钉的扭矩应力比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):1306-1311.
5
Finite element analysis to determine implant preload.用于确定植入物预紧力的有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Dec;90(6):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.012.
6
Effect of the coefficient of friction and tightening speed on the preload induced at the dental implant complex with the finite element method.摩擦系数和拧紧速度对牙科种植体复合体预紧力影响的有限元法研究
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 May;113(5):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.021. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
7
Influence of lubricant on screw preload and stresses in a finite element model for a dental implant.润滑剂对牙科种植体有限元模型中螺钉预紧力和应力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Aug;112(2):340-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.016. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
8
Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex.牙种植复合体基台螺钉预紧力的概率分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):183-93. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60177-8.
9
Preload evaluation of 2 implant-supported fixed partial denture abutment designs.两种种植体支持的固定局部义齿基台设计的预载评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Nov;128(5):1067.e1-1067.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.002.
10
Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.牙冠高度增加对短种植体部件及其周围骨组织应力分布的影响:有限元分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jun;113(6):548-57. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.007. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Fatigue Resistance of Customized Implant-Supported Restorations.定制种植体支持修复体的抗疲劳性能
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;18(14):3420. doi: 10.3390/ma18143420.
2
Spatially distributed and interconnected porous architectures for dental implants.用于牙种植体的空间分布且相互连接的多孔结构
Int J Implant Dent. 2025 Apr 7;11(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40729-025-00618-6.
3
Evaluation of finite element modeling methods for predicting compression screw failure in a custom pelvic implant.用于预测定制骨盆植入物中加压螺钉失效的有限元建模方法评估

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Loading Angles and Implant Lengths on the Static and Fatigue Fractures of Dental Implants.加载角度和种植体长度对牙种植体静态和疲劳骨折的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;14(19):5542. doi: 10.3390/ma14195542.
2
Comparison of the Effect of Four Different Abutment Screw Torques on Screw Loosening in Single Implant-Supported Prosthesis after the Application of Mechanical Loading.机械加载后,四种不同基台螺丝扭矩对单颗种植体支持式修复体螺丝松动影响的比较。
Int J Dent. 2021 Jul 19;2021:3595064. doi: 10.1155/2021/3595064. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Aug 20;12:1420870. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1420870. eCollection 2024.
4
Structural and torque changes in implant components of different diameters subjected to mechanical fatigue.不同直径种植体部件在机械疲劳下的结构和扭矩变化。
Dent Mater. 2024 Mar;40(3):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.12.014. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
5
Mechanical Behavior of One-Piece and Two-Piece Tapered Prosthetic Abutments with 11.5 and 16 Degrees.11.5度和16度的一体式和两件式锥形修复基台的力学行为
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;11(12):1775. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121775.
一体式和分体式种植体在窄径和超窄径下的应力分布比较分析:有限元研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0245800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245800. eCollection 2021.
4
Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.不同种植体设计在非轴向载荷下对应变和应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 1;17(13):4738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134738.
5
Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.两种种植体连接系统中基台螺钉预紧力的影响:三维有限元研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Nov;122(5):474.e1-474.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
6
A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.外六角与莫氏锥度种植体基台螺钉的扭矩应力比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):1306-1311.
7
Effect of loading frequency on cyclic fatigue lifetime of a standard-diameter implant with an internal abutment connection.加载频率对带内连接体的标准直径种植体循环疲劳寿命的影响。
Dent Mater. 2018 Dec;34(12):1711-1716. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
8
Fatigue lifetime prediction of a reduced-diameter dental implant system: Numerical and experimental study.一种减小直径的牙种植体系统的疲劳寿命预测:数值和实验研究。
Dent Mater. 2018 Sep;34(9):1299-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
9
Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with and without Microthreads under Static and Dynamic Loading.带微螺纹和不带微螺纹的牙种植体在静态和动态载荷下的有限元分析
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2017;27(1):25-35. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2017020007.
10
Biomechanical evaluation of one-piece and two-piece small-diameter dental implants: In-vitro experimental and three-dimensional finite element analyses.一体式和分体式小直径牙种植体的生物力学评估:体外实验和三维有限元分析。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2016 Sep;115(9):794-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Mar 21.