Hampton Chiara E, Riebold Thomas W, LeBlanc Nicole L, Scollan Katherine F, Mandsager Ronald E, Sisson David D
Am J Vet Res. 2019 Jan;80(1):33-44. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.80.1.33.
OBJECTIVE To compare effects of tiletamine-zolazepam, alfaxalone, ketamine-diazepam, and propofol for anesthetic induction on cardiorespiratory and acid-base variables before and during isoflurane-maintained anesthesia in healthy dogs. ANIMALS 6 dogs. PROCEDURES Dogs were anesthetized with sevoflurane and instrumented. After dogs recovered from anesthesia, baseline values for cardiorespiratory variables and cardiac output were determined, and arterial and mixed-venous blood samples were obtained. Tiletamine-zolazepam (5 mg/kg), alfaxalone (4 mg/kg), propofol (6 mg/kg), or ketamine-diazepam (7 and 0.3 mg/kg) was administered IV in 25% increments to enable intubation. After induction (M) and at 10, 20, 40, and 60 minutes of a light anesthetic plane maintained with isoflurane, measurements and sample collections were repeated. Cardiorespiratory and acid-base variables were compared with a repeated-measures ANOVA and post hoc t test and between time points with a pairwise Tukey test. RESULTS Mean ± SD intubation doses were 3.8 ± 0.8 mg/kg for tiletamine-zolazepam, 2.8 ± 0.3 mg/kg for alfaxalone, 6.1 ± 0.9 mg/kg and 0.26 ± 0.04 mg/kg for ketamine-diazepam, and 5.4 ± 1.1 mg/kg for propofol. Anesthetic depth was similar among regimens. At M, heart rate increased by 94.9%, 74.7%, and 54.3% for tiletamine-zolazepam, ketamine-diazepam, and alfaxalone, respectively. Tiletamine-zolazepam caused higher oxygen delivery than propofol. Postinduction apnea occurred in 3 dogs when receiving alfaxalone. Acid-base variables remained within reference limits. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE In healthy dogs in which a light plane of anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane, cardiovascular and metabolic effects after induction with tiletamine-zolazepam were comparable to those after induction with alfaxalone and ketamine-diazepam.
目的 比较替来他明-唑拉西泮、阿法沙龙、氯胺酮-地西泮和丙泊酚在健康犬异氟烷维持麻醉前及麻醉期间诱导麻醉对心肺和酸碱变量的影响。动物 6只犬。方法 犬用七氟烷麻醉并进行仪器监测。犬从麻醉中恢复后,测定心肺变量和心输出量的基线值,并采集动脉血和混合静脉血样本。以25%的增量静脉注射替来他明-唑拉西泮(5 mg/kg)、阿法沙龙(4 mg/kg)、丙泊酚(6 mg/kg)或氯胺酮-地西泮(7和0.3 mg/kg)以进行气管插管。诱导后(M)以及在异氟烷维持的浅麻醉平面下10、20、40和60分钟时,重复进行测量和样本采集。采用重复测量方差分析和事后t检验比较心肺和酸碱变量,并采用两两Tukey检验比较各时间点之间的差异。结果 替来他明-唑拉西泮、阿法沙龙、氯胺酮-地西泮和丙泊酚的平均±标准差插管剂量分别为3.8±0.8 mg/kg、2.8±0.3 mg/kg、6.1±0.9 mg/kg和0.26±0.04 mg/kg以及5.4±1.1 mg/kg。各方案的麻醉深度相似。在M时,替来他明-唑拉西泮、氯胺酮-地西泮和阿法沙龙使心率分别增加了94.9%、74.7%和54.3%。替来他明-唑拉西泮比丙泊酚产生更高的氧输送量。接受阿法沙龙时,3只犬出现诱导后呼吸暂停。酸碱变量保持在参考范围内。结论及临床意义 在使用异氟烷维持浅麻醉平面的健康犬中,替来他明-唑拉西泮诱导后对心血管和代谢的影响与阿法沙龙和氯胺酮-地西泮诱导后的影响相当。