Centre Constitutif SLA, CHU Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours cedex 1, France; Fédération des centres SLA de Tours et Limoges, Litorals, France.
Centre Constitutif SLA, CHU Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours cedex 1, France; Fédération des centres SLA de Tours et Limoges, Litorals, France.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2019 May;175(5):277-282. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a heterogenous motoneuronal neurodegenerative condition with a panel of phenotypes exhibiting different clinical patterns. Two compounds are currently available for the treatment of ALS but the majority of trials have failed to show a positive effect on prognosis. One of the explanations which could be put forward involves the way efficacy is evaluated: clinicians agree that the ALSFRS-revised scale used in all trials does not fit with highlighting a positive effect. So, the development and validation of new tools allowing a reliable assessment of ALS has become a key issue in clinical research. Over the last three years, two functional scales (the King's College and MiToS staging systems) have been proposed. These scales rely on two different approaches to ALS: an anatomical and prognostic concept, and loss of autonomy. Both scales propose five stages. We will discuss below the contribution of these two scales to clinical evaluation and the questions which remain to be resolved in the future.
肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种异质性运动神经元神经退行性疾病,具有一系列表现出不同临床模式的表型。目前有两种化合物可用于治疗 ALS,但大多数试验未能显示对预后有积极影响。其中一种解释可能涉及到疗效评估的方式:临床医生一致认为,所有试验中使用的修订后的 ALSFRS 量表并不适合突出积极的效果。因此,开发和验证新的工具来可靠评估 ALS 已成为临床研究中的一个关键问题。在过去的三年中,提出了两种功能量表(King's College 和 MiToS 分期系统)。这些量表依赖于 ALS 的两种不同方法:解剖学和预后概念以及自主丧失。这两个量表都提出了五个阶段。下面我们将讨论这两种量表对临床评估的贡献以及未来需要解决的问题。