Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; and.
Epidemiology and Cancer Statistics Group, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Blood. 2019 Mar 21;133(12):1325-1334. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-08-867333. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
The diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) remains centered on morphology, meaning that the distinction from a reactive monocytosis is challenging. Mutational analysis and immunophenotyping have been proposed as potential tools for diagnosis; however, they have not been formally assessed in combination. We aimed to investigate the clinical utility of these technologies by performing targeted sequencing, in parallel with current gold standard techniques, on consecutive samples referred for investigation of monocytosis over a 2-year period (N = 283). Results were correlated with the morphological diagnosis and objective outcome measures, including overall survival (OS) and longitudinal blood counts. Somatic mutations were detected in 79% of patients, being invariably identified in those with a confirmed diagnosis (99%) but also in 57% of patients with nondiagnostic bone marrow features. The OS in nondiagnostic mutated patients was indistinguishable from those with CMML ( = .118) and significantly worse than in unmutated patients ( = .0002). On multivariate analysis, age, ASXL1, CBL, DNMT3A, NRAS, and RUNX1 mutations retained significance. Furthermore, the presence of a mutation was associated with a progressive decrease in hemoglobin/platelet levels and increasing monocyte counts compared with mutation-negative patients. Of note, the immunophenotypic features of nondiagnostic mutated patients were comparable to CMML patients, and the presence of aberrant CD56 was highly specific for detecting a mutation. Overall, somatic mutations are detected at high frequency in patients referred with a monocytosis, irrespective of diagnosis. In those without a World Health Organization-defined diagnosis, the mutation spectrum, immunophenotypic features, and OS are indistinguishable from CMML patients, and these patients should be managed as such.
慢性粒单核细胞白血病(CMML)的诊断仍然以形态学为中心,这意味着与反应性单核细胞增多症的区分具有挑战性。突变分析和免疫表型分析已被提议作为潜在的诊断工具;然而,它们尚未在组合中进行正式评估。我们旨在通过在 2 年内对连续的单核细胞增多症样本进行靶向测序,同时结合当前的金标准技术,来研究这些技术的临床实用性(N=283)。结果与形态学诊断和客观的预后指标(包括总生存期[OS]和纵向血液计数)相关。在 79%的患者中检测到体细胞突变,这些突变在确诊的患者(99%)中始终存在,但在骨髓特征无诊断意义的患者中也存在 57%。在无诊断意义的突变患者中,OS 与 CMML 患者无法区分(=.118),明显比未突变患者差(=.0002)。在多变量分析中,年龄、ASXL1、CBL、DNMT3A、NRAS 和 RUNX1 突变仍然具有显著性。此外,与突变阴性患者相比,突变的存在与血红蛋白/血小板水平逐渐下降和单核细胞计数增加相关。值得注意的是,无诊断意义的突变患者的免疫表型特征与 CMML 患者相似,异常 CD56 的存在对检测突变具有高度特异性。总体而言,在患有单核细胞增多症的患者中,无论诊断如何,均以高频率检测到体细胞突变。在没有世界卫生组织定义的诊断的患者中,突变谱、免疫表型特征和 OS 与 CMML 患者无法区分,这些患者应按 CMML 患者进行治疗。