Chandraratnam Edward, Santos Leonardo D, Chou Shaun, Dai Jun, Luo Juan, Liza Syeda, Chin Ronald Y
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Austpath Laboratories, Northmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Sydney South West Pathology Service, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
J Pathol Inform. 2018 Dec 3;9:41. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_57_18. eCollection 2018.
Telepathology can potentially be utilized as an alternative to having on-site pathology services for rural and regional hospitals. The goal of the study was to validate two small-footprint desktop telepathology systems for remote parathyroid frozen sections.
Three pathologists retrospectively diagnosed 76 parathyroidectomy frozen sections of 52 patients from three pathology services in Australia using the "live-view mode" of MikroScan D2 and Aperio LV1 and in-house direct microscopy. The final paraffin section diagnosis served as the "gold standard" for accuracy evaluation. Concordance rates of the telepathology systems with direct microscopy, inter-pathologist and intra-pathologist agreement, and the time taken to report each slide were analyzed.
Both telepathology systems showed high diagnostic accuracy (>99%) and high concordance (>99%) with direct microscopy. High inter-pathologist agreement for telepathology systems was demonstrated by overall kappa values of 0.92 for Aperio LV1 and 0.85 for MikroScan D2. High kappa values (from 0.85 to 1) for intra-pathologist agreement within the three systems were also observed. The time taken per slide by Aperio LV1 and MicroScan D2 within three pathologists was about 3.0 times ( < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8-3.2) and 7.7 times ( < 0.001, 95% CI: 7.1-8.3) as long as direct microscopy, respectively, while MikroScan D2 took about 2.6 times as long as Aperio LV1 ( < 0.001, 95% CI: 2.4-2.7). All pathologists evaluated Aperio LV1 as being more user-friendly.
Telepathology diagnosis of parathyroidectomy frozen sections through small-footprint desktop systems is accurate, reliable, and comparable with in-house direct microscopy. Telepathology systems take longer than direct microscopy; however, the time taken is within clinically acceptable limits. Aperio LV1 takes shorter time than MikroScan D2 and is more user-friendly.
远程病理学有可能作为农村和地区医院现场病理学服务的替代方案。本研究的目的是验证两种小尺寸台式远程病理学系统用于远程甲状旁腺冰冻切片的效果。
三名病理学家使用MikroScan D2和Aperio LV1的“实时查看模式”以及内部直接显微镜检查,对来自澳大利亚三个病理服务机构的52例患者的76份甲状旁腺切除术冰冻切片进行回顾性诊断。最终石蜡切片诊断作为准确性评估的“金标准”。分析了远程病理学系统与直接显微镜检查的一致性率、病理学家之间和病理学家内部的一致性,以及报告每张切片所需的时间。
两种远程病理学系统均显示出较高的诊断准确性(>99%),且与直接显微镜检查具有较高的一致性(>99%)。Aperio LV1的总体kappa值为0.92,MikroScan D2的总体kappa值为0.85,这表明远程病理学系统在病理学家之间具有较高的一致性。在这三个系统中,病理学家内部的一致性kappa值也较高(从0.85到1)。在三名病理学家中,Aperio LV1和MicroScan D2报告每张切片所需的时间分别约为直接显微镜检查的3.0倍(<0.001,95%置信区间[CI]:2.8 - 3.2)和7.7倍(<0.001,95% CI:7.1 - 8.3),而MikroScan D2所需时间约为Aperio LV1的2.6倍(<0.001,95% CI:2.4 - 2.7)。所有病理学家都认为Aperio LV1更便于使用。
通过小尺寸台式系统对甲状旁腺切除术冰冻切片进行远程病理学诊断是准确、可靠的,并且与内部直接显微镜检查相当。远程病理学系统比直接显微镜检查耗时更长;然而,所花费的时间在临床可接受范围内。Aperio LV1比MikroScan D2耗时更短且更便于使用。