Department of Experimental Psychology, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6HG, UK.
Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Apr;19(2):225-230. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00682-z.
Many complex real-world decisions, such as deciding which house to buy or whether to switch jobs, involve trying to maximize reward across a sequence of choices. Optimal Foraging Theory is well suited to study these kinds of choices because it provides formal models for reward-maximization in sequential situations. In this article, we review recent insights from foraging neuroscience, behavioral ecology, and computational modelling. We find that a commonly used approach in foraging neuroscience, in which choice items are encountered at random, does not reflect the way animals direct their foraging efforts in certain real-world settings, nor does it reflect efficient reward-maximizing behavior. Based on this, we propose that task designs allowing subjects to encounter choice items strategically will further improve the ecological validity of foraging approaches used in neuroscience, as well as give rise to new behavioral and neural predictions that deepen our understanding of sequential, value-based choice.
许多复杂的现实世界决策,如决定购买哪所房子或是否换工作,都涉及到在一系列选择中试图最大化回报。最优觅食理论非常适合研究这类决策,因为它为序列情况下的奖励最大化提供了正式模型。在本文中,我们回顾了觅食神经科学、行为生态学和计算建模方面的最新研究进展。我们发现,觅食神经科学中常用的一种方法是随机遇到选择项,这种方法既不能反映动物在某些真实环境中引导觅食努力的方式,也不能反映出有效的最大化奖励的行为。基于这一点,我们提出,允许实验对象进行策略性地遇到选择项的任务设计将进一步提高神经科学中觅食方法的生态有效性,并产生新的行为和神经预测,从而加深我们对基于价值的序列选择的理解。