Suppr超能文献

重新审视神经科学中的觅食方法。

Revisiting foraging approaches in neuroscience.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6HG, UK.

Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Apr;19(2):225-230. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00682-z.

Abstract

Many complex real-world decisions, such as deciding which house to buy or whether to switch jobs, involve trying to maximize reward across a sequence of choices. Optimal Foraging Theory is well suited to study these kinds of choices because it provides formal models for reward-maximization in sequential situations. In this article, we review recent insights from foraging neuroscience, behavioral ecology, and computational modelling. We find that a commonly used approach in foraging neuroscience, in which choice items are encountered at random, does not reflect the way animals direct their foraging efforts in certain real-world settings, nor does it reflect efficient reward-maximizing behavior. Based on this, we propose that task designs allowing subjects to encounter choice items strategically will further improve the ecological validity of foraging approaches used in neuroscience, as well as give rise to new behavioral and neural predictions that deepen our understanding of sequential, value-based choice.

摘要

许多复杂的现实世界决策,如决定购买哪所房子或是否换工作,都涉及到在一系列选择中试图最大化回报。最优觅食理论非常适合研究这类决策,因为它为序列情况下的奖励最大化提供了正式模型。在本文中,我们回顾了觅食神经科学、行为生态学和计算建模方面的最新研究进展。我们发现,觅食神经科学中常用的一种方法是随机遇到选择项,这种方法既不能反映动物在某些真实环境中引导觅食努力的方式,也不能反映出有效的最大化奖励的行为。基于这一点,我们提出,允许实验对象进行策略性地遇到选择项的任务设计将进一步提高神经科学中觅食方法的生态有效性,并产生新的行为和神经预测,从而加深我们对基于价值的序列选择的理解。

相似文献

1
Revisiting foraging approaches in neuroscience.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Apr;19(2):225-230. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00682-z.
2
Foraging optimally in social neuroscience: computations and methodological considerations.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):782-794. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa037.
3
Learning the opportunity cost of time in a patch-foraging task.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Dec;15(4):837-53. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0350-y.
4
Normative decision rules in changing environments.
Elife. 2022 Oct 25;11:e79824. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79824.
5
Dorsal anterior cingulate and ventromedial prefrontal cortex have inverse roles in both foraging and economic choice.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Dec;16(6):1127-1139. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0458-8.
6
How honey bees make fast and accurate decisions.
Elife. 2023 Jun 27;12:e86176. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86176.
8
Rat Anterior Cingulate Cortex Continuously Signals Decision Variables in a Patch Foraging Task.
J Neurosci. 2022 Jul 20;42(29):5730-5744. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1940-21.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
9
Effort Foraging Task reveals positive correlation between individual differences in the cost of cognitive and physical effort in humans.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Dec 12;120(50):e2221510120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221510120. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
10
Chronic and Acute Stress Promote Overexploitation in Serial Decision Making.
J Neurosci. 2017 Jun 7;37(23):5681-5689. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3618-16.2017. Epub 2017 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing Response Vigour Under Time Pressure as a Transdiagnostic Marker of Eating Disorders.
Comput Psychiatr. 2025 Aug 14;9(1):124-141. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.130. eCollection 2025.
2
Computational Urban Ecology of New York City Rats.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 24:2025.07.21.665423. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.21.665423.
3
decision-making revealed via a quantitative and ethological study of foraging.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 16:2024.09.18.613674. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.18.613674.
4
Linking cognitive strategy, neural mechanism, and movement statistics in group foraging behaviors.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 18;14(1):21770. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71931-0.
5
Acetylcholine and noradrenaline enhance foraging optimality in humans.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Sep 5;120(36):e2305596120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305596120. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
6
Learning and organization of within-session sequences by pigeons (Columba livia).
Anim Cogn. 2023 Sep;26(5):1571-1587. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01801-1. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
7
Dissecting the neurocomputational bases of patch-switching.
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 8;33(12):7930-7940. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad088.
8
Synthetic Spatial Foraging With Active Inference in a Geocaching Task.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 8;16:802396. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.802396. eCollection 2022.
9
Choice history effects in mice and humans improve reward harvesting efficiency.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Oct 4;17(10):e1009452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009452. eCollection 2021 Oct.
10
Control over patch encounters changes foraging behavior.
iScience. 2021 Aug 20;24(9):103005. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103005. eCollection 2021 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jul;19(7):419-427. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0010-7.
2
Activation of serotonin neurons promotes active persistence in a probabilistic foraging task.
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 8;9(1):1000. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03438-y.
3
Enriching behavioral ecology with reinforcement learning methods.
Behav Processes. 2019 Apr;161:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
Posterior Cingulate Neurons Dynamically Signal Decisions to Disengage during Foraging.
Neuron. 2017 Oct 11;96(2):339-347.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.048.
5
(Reinforcement?) Learning to forage optimally.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2017 Oct;46:162-169. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
6
Increased locus coeruleus tonic activity causes disengagement from a patch-foraging task.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Dec;17(6):1073-1083. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0531-y.
7
Cost-Benefit Arbitration Between Multiple Reinforcement-Learning Systems.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1321-1333. doi: 10.1177/0956797617708288. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control.
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Sep 27;19(10):1286-91. doi: 10.1038/nn.4384.
9
Value, search, persistence and model updating in anterior cingulate cortex.
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Sep 27;19(10):1280-5. doi: 10.1038/nn.4382.
10
Dorsal anterior cingulate: a Rorschach test for cognitive neuroscience.
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Sep 27;19(10):1278-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.4387.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验