Lenow Jennifer K, Constantino Sara M, Daw Nathaniel D, Phelps Elizabeth A
Department of Psychology and.
Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, and.
J Neurosci. 2017 Jun 7;37(23):5681-5689. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3618-16.2017. Epub 2017 May 8.
Many decisions that humans make resemble foraging problems in which a currently available, known option must be weighed against an unknown alternative option. In such foraging decisions, the quality of the overall environment can be used as a proxy for estimating the value of future unknown options against which current prospects are compared. We hypothesized that such foraging-like decisions would be characteristically sensitive to stress, a physiological response that tracks biologically relevant changes in environmental context. Specifically, we hypothesized that stress would lead to more exploitative foraging behavior. To test this, we investigated how acute and chronic stress, as measured by changes in cortisol in response to an acute stress manipulation and subjective scores on a questionnaire assessing recent chronic stress, relate to performance in a virtual sequential foraging task. We found that both types of stress bias human decision makers toward overexploiting current options relative to an optimal policy. These findings suggest a possible computational role of stress in decision making in which stress biases judgments of environmental quality. Many of the most biologically relevant decisions that we make are foraging-like decisions about whether to stay with a current option or search the environment for a potentially better one. In the current study, we found that both acute physiological and chronic subjective stress are associated with greater overexploitation or staying at current options for longer than is optimal. These results suggest a domain-general way in which stress might bias foraging decisions through changing one's appraisal of the overall quality of the environment. These novel findings not only have implications for understanding how this important class of foraging decisions might be biologically implemented, but also for understanding the computational role of stress in behavior and cognition more broadly.
人类做出的许多决策类似于觅食问题,即在已知的当前可用选项与未知的替代选项之间进行权衡。在这类觅食决策中,整体环境的质量可作为一个指标,用于估计与当前前景相比较的未来未知选项的价值。我们假设,这类类似觅食的决策会对压力表现出典型的敏感性,压力是一种生理反应,可追踪环境背景中与生物学相关的变化。具体而言,我们假设压力会导致更多的剥削性觅食行为。为了验证这一点,我们通过急性应激操作引起的皮质醇变化以及一份评估近期慢性压力的问卷中的主观得分来衡量急性和慢性压力,并研究其与虚拟顺序觅食任务中的表现之间的关系。我们发现,相对于最优策略,这两种类型的压力都会使人类决策者倾向于过度利用当前选项。这些发现表明压力在决策过程中可能具有一种计算作用,即压力会影响对环境质量的判断。我们做出的许多与生物学最相关的决策都是类似觅食的决策,即决定是继续选择当前选项还是在环境中寻找可能更好的选项。在当前的研究中,我们发现急性生理压力和慢性主观压力都与过度剥削或比最优情况更长时间地停留在当前选项有关。这些结果表明了一种通用的方式,压力可能通过改变对环境整体质量的评估来影响觅食决策。这些新发现不仅对理解这类重要的觅食决策在生物学上可能是如何实现的具有启示意义,而且对更广泛地理解压力在行为和认知中的计算作用也具有启示意义。