Tol A, Quik R F, Thyssen J H
Lukas Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1988 Oct 14;10(5):213-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01956873.
A comparison between human and porcine insulins with regard to their adsorption to administration sets was performed. A 125I-mono(A14)-iodinated insulin was used to follow the adsorption phenomenon over time and the adsorption was quantified with radioimmunoassays of unlabelled insulin. The obtained data were similar for both methods. No relevant difference in adsorption was found between human and porcine insulin. Both insulins showed a significantly more pronounced initial drop in delivered insulin when polyethylene tubing was used. After 3 h a steady state was reached, resulting in the administration of a more predictable dose. Particularly in the initial phase an important reduction in the amount of both insulins actually delivered to the patient was observed when compared to the expected amount as calculated from the concentration present in the container and the infusion rate. Therefore, the mainstay in treatment of a patient with ketoacidosis remains frequent serum glucose measurement and making appropriate infusion rate adjustments on that basis.
对人胰岛素和猪胰岛素在给药装置上的吸附情况进行了比较。使用125I-单(A14)碘化胰岛素来追踪随时间的吸附现象,并通过未标记胰岛素的放射免疫测定对吸附进行定量。两种方法获得的数据相似。人胰岛素和猪胰岛素之间未发现吸附的相关差异。当使用聚乙烯导管时,两种胰岛素在输送胰岛素时均显示出更明显的初始下降。3小时后达到稳定状态,从而使给药剂量更可预测。特别是在初始阶段,与根据容器中存在的浓度和输注速率计算出的预期量相比,观察到实际输送给患者的两种胰岛素量均有重要减少。因此,酮症酸中毒患者治疗的主要方法仍然是频繁测量血清葡萄糖并在此基础上进行适当的输注速率调整。