铁剂用于治疗不宁腿综合征。
Iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome.
作者信息
Trotti Lynn M, Becker Lorne A
机构信息
Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, 12 Executive Park Drive NE, Atlanta, USA, 30329.
出版信息
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 4;1(1):CD007834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007834.pub3.
BACKGROUND
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurologic disorder that is associated with peripheral iron deficiency in a subgroup of patients. It is unclear whether iron therapy is effective treatment for RLS.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral or parenteral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS) when compared with placebo or other therapies.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycNFO, and CINAHL for the time period January 1995 to September 2017. We searched reference lists for additional published studies. We searched Clinicaltrials.gov and other clinical trial registries (September 2017) for ongoing or unpublished studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Controlled trials comparing any formulation of iron with placebo, other medications, or no treatment, in adults diagnosed with RLS according to expert clinical interview or explicit diagnostic criteria.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality, with discussion to reach consensus in the case of any disagreement. The primary outcome considered in this review was restlessness or unpleasant sensations, as experienced subjectively by the patient. We combined treatment/control differences in the outcomes across studies using random-effects meta-analyses. We analysed continuous data using mean differences (MDs) where possible and performed standardised mean difference (SMD) analyses when different measurements were used across studies. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data using the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We analysed study heterogeneity using the I statistic. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We performed GRADE analysis using GRADEpro.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified and included 10 studies (428 total participants, followed for 2-16 weeks) in this review. Our primary outcome was restlessness or uncomfortable leg sensations, which was quantified using the International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) (range, 0 to 40) in eight trials and a different RLS symptom scale in a ninth trial. Nine studies compared iron to placebo and one study compared iron to a dopamine agonist (pramipexole). The possibility for bias among the trials was variable. Three studies had a single element with high risk of bias, which was lack of blinding in two and incomplete outcome data in one. All studies had at least one feature resulting in unclear risk of bias.Combining data from the seven trials using the IRLS to compare iron and placebo, use of iron resulted in greater improvement in IRLS scores (MD -3.78, 95% CI -6.25 to -1.31; I= 66%, 7 studies, 345 participants) measured 2 to 12 weeks after treatment. Including an eighth study, which measured restlessness using a different scale, use of iron remained beneficial compared to placebo (SMD -0.74, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.23; I = 80%, 8 studies, 370 participants). The GRADE assessment of certainty for this outcome was moderate.The single study comparing iron to a dopamine agonist (pramipexole) found a similar reduction in RLS severity in the two groups (MD -0.40, 95% CI -5.93 to 5.13, 30 participants).Assessment of secondary outcomes was limited by small numbers of trials assessing each outcome. Iron did not improve quality of life as a dichotomous measure (RR 2.01, 95% CI 0.54 to 7.45; I=54%, 2 studies, 39 participants), but did improve quality of life measured on continuous scales (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.87; I= 0%, 3 studies, 128 participants), compared to placebo. Subjective sleep quality was no different between iron and placebo groups (SMD 0.19, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.56; I = 9%, 3 studies, 128 participants), nor was objective sleep quality, as measured by change in sleep efficiency in a single study (-35.5 +/- 92.0 versus -41.4 +/- 98.2, 18 participants). Periodic limb movements of sleep were not significantly reduced with iron compared to placebo ( SMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.32; I = 0%, 2 studies, 60 participants). Iron did not improve sleepiness compared to placebo, as measured on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (data not provided, 1 study, 60 participants) but did improve the daytime tiredness item of the RLS-6 compared to placebo (least squares mean difference -1.5, 95% CI -2.5 to -0.6; 1 study, 110 participants). The GRADE rating for secondary outcomes ranged from low to very low.Prespecified subgroup analyses showed more improvement with iron in those trials studying participants on dialysis. The use of low serum ferritin levels as an inclusion criteria and the use or oral versus intravenous iron did not show significant subgroup differences.Iron did not result in significantly more adverse events than placebo (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.25; I=45%, 6 studies, 298 participants). A single study reported that people treated with iron therapy experienced fewer adverse events than the active comparator pramipexole.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Iron therapy probably improves restlessness and RLS severity in comparison to placebo. Iron therapy may not increase the risk of side effects in comparison to placebo. We are uncertain whether iron therapy improves quality of life in comparison to placebo. Iron therapy may make little or no difference to pramipexole in restlessness and RLS severity, as well as in the risk of adverse events. The effect on secondary outcomes such as quality of life, daytime functioning, and sleep quality, the optimal timing and formulation of administration, and patient characteristics predicting response require additional study.
背景
不安腿综合征(RLS)是一种常见的神经系统疾病,在一部分患者中与外周铁缺乏有关。铁疗法是否是治疗RLS的有效方法尚不清楚。
目的
评估口服或胃肠外铁剂治疗不安腿综合征(RLS)相较于安慰剂或其他疗法的疗效和安全性。
检索方法
我们检索了考克兰对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycNFO和CINAHL,检索时间段为1995年1月至2017年9月。我们检索了参考文献列表以查找其他已发表的研究。我们检索了Clinicaltrials.gov和其他临床试验注册库(2017年9月)以查找正在进行或未发表的研究。
选择标准
根据专家临床访谈或明确的诊断标准,对诊断为RLS的成年人进行的对照试验,比较任何铁制剂与安慰剂、其他药物或不治疗的效果。
数据收集与分析
两位综述作者独立提取数据并评估试验质量,如有任何分歧则通过讨论达成共识。本综述考虑的主要结局是患者主观体验到的不安或不愉快感觉。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析合并了各研究中结局的治疗/对照差异。我们尽可能使用均数差值(MDs)分析连续数据,当各研究使用不同测量方法时则进行标准化均数差值(SMD)分析。我们使用Mantel-Haenszel方法计算二分数据的风险比(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。我们使用I²统计量分析研究异质性。我们采用考克兰预期的标准方法程序。我们使用GRADEpro进行GRADE分析。
主要结果
我们在本综述中识别并纳入了10项研究(共428名参与者,随访2至16周)。我们的主要结局是不安或腿部不适感,在八项试验中使用国际不安腿量表(IRLS)(范围为0至40)进行量化,在第九项试验中使用不同的RLS症状量表进行量化。九项研究比较了铁剂与安慰剂,一项研究比较了铁剂与多巴胺激动剂(普拉克索)。试验中存在偏倚的可能性各不相同。三项研究有一个单一因素存在高偏倚风险,其中两项是缺乏盲法,一项是结局数据不完整。所有研究至少有一个特征导致偏倚风险不明确。使用IRLS合并七项试验的数据以比较铁剂和安慰剂,治疗后2至12周测量,使用铁剂导致IRLS评分有更大改善(MD -3.78,95% CI -6.25至-1.31;I² = 66%,7项研究,345名参与者)。纳入第八项研究,该研究使用不同量表测量不安,与安慰剂相比,使用铁剂仍然有益(SMD -0.74,95% CI -1.26至-0.23;I² = 80%,8项研究,370名参与者)。该结局的GRADE确定性评估为中等。比较铁剂与多巴胺激动剂(普拉克索)的单一研究发现两组RLS严重程度有相似降低(MD -0.40,95% CI -5.93至5.13,30名参与者)。次要结局的评估受到评估每个结局的试验数量较少的限制。作为二分测量指标,铁剂未改善生活质量(RR 2.01,95% CI 0.54至7.45;I² = 54%,2项研究,39名参与者),但与安慰剂相比,在连续量表测量的生活质量方面有改善(SMD 0.51,95% CI 0.15至0.87;I² = 0%,3项研究,128名参与者)。铁剂组和安慰剂组的主观睡眠质量无差异(SMD 0.19,95% CI -0.18至0.56;I² = 9%,3项研究,128名参与者),通过一项单一研究中的睡眠效率变化测量的客观睡眠质量也无差异(-35.5 +/- 92.0对-41.4 +/- 98.2,18名参与者)。与安慰剂相比,铁剂未显著降低睡眠期周期性肢体运动(SMD -0.19,95% CI -0.70至0.32;I² = 0%,2项研究,60名参与者)。与安慰剂相比,根据爱泼华嗜睡量表测量,铁剂未改善嗜睡情况(数据未提供,1项研究,60名参与者),但与安慰剂相比,在RLS-6的日间疲劳项目上有改善(最小二乘均数差值 -1.5,95% CI -2.5至-0.6;1项研究,110名参与者)。次要结局的GRADE评级从低到非常低。预先设定的亚组分析显示,在研究透析参与者的试验中,铁剂有更多改善。将低血清铁蛋白水平作为纳入标准以及使用口服与静脉铁剂未显示出显著的亚组差异。铁剂导致的不良事件不比安慰剂显著更多(RR 1.48,95% CI 0.97至2.25;I² = 45%,6项研究,298名参与者)。一项单一研究报告称,接受铁疗法治疗的人比活性对照普拉克索经历的不良事件更少。
作者结论
与安慰剂相比,铁疗法可能改善不安和RLS严重程度。与安慰剂相比,铁疗法可能不会增加副作用风险。我们不确定与安慰剂相比,铁疗法是否改善生活质量。在不安和RLS严重程度以及不良事件风险方面,铁疗法与普拉克索可能几乎没有差异或无差异。对生活质量、日间功能和睡眠质量等次要结局的影响、给药的最佳时机和剂型以及预测反应的患者特征需要进一步研究。