MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Oncologist. 2019 Aug;24(8):1066-1075. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0520. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Using data from four tertiary referral centers in the U.S., we assessed real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients with locally advanced/metastatic (typical/atypical) lung NETs treated between July 2011 and December 2014. Index date was histologically confirmed typical/atypical carcinoid tumor diagnosis date. Data included baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, progression, death, and lung NET-related health care resource use from index date through last contact/death. Time to treatment discontinuation and first progression, time from first to second progression, and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
We identified 83 patients; 19 (23%) had functional NET. First-line treatments included somatostatin analogs (SSAs) alone (56%) or in combination with other therapies (6%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (20%), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (9%), liver-directed therapy (LDT) (4%), and everolimus/other (5%). Sixty patients had second-line therapy including SSA alone (18%) or in combination (40%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (17%), everolimus (12%), LDT (7%), EBRT (3%), and other treatments (3%). Median time (months) to first-line discontinuation were as follows: SSAs, 43.3; cytotoxic chemotherapy, 3.6. Overall median time (months) to investigator-assessed progression following treatment initiation was 12.4. Median OS (months) following treatment initiation was 66.4 for all patients and 81.5 for patients receiving SSAs.
SSAs, alone and in combination, are common treatments for advanced lung NETs. Patients have additional treatment options and relatively long survival compared with patients with other advanced cancers. Treatment pattern assessment following approval of newer treatments is needed.
Somatostatin analogs (SSAs), cytotoxic chemotherapy, EBRT, liver-directed therapy, and targeted therapies are common treatments for locally advanced/metastatic (typical/atypical) lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). SSAs alone or in combination with other treatment modalities were the most common first- and second-line therapy, followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients continued treatment with SSAs long-term with median treatment duration of 43 months. Median overall survival was 66 months following initiation of first-line therapy for all patients. Treatment pattern assessment beyond the time period of this study is needed given recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for additional treatments for lung NETs that will likely be incorporated in the treatment landscape.
我们使用美国四家三级转诊中心的数据,评估了晚期肺神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)患者的真实世界治疗模式和临床结局。
受试者、材料和方法:我们对 2011 年 7 月至 2014 年 12 月期间接受局部晚期/转移性(典型/非典型)肺 NET 治疗的成年患者进行了回顾性图表审查。索引日期为组织学证实的典型/非典型类癌肿瘤诊断日期。数据包括基线特征、治疗模式、进展、死亡以及从索引日期到最后一次联系/死亡的与肺 NET 相关的医疗资源使用情况。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析估计治疗中断和第一次进展的时间、从第一次进展到第二次进展的时间以及总生存期(OS)。
我们确定了 83 名患者;其中 19 名(23%)患者存在功能性 NET。一线治疗包括生长抑素类似物(SSA)单药治疗(56%)或联合其他疗法(6%)、细胞毒性化疗(20%)、外照射放疗(EBRT)(9%)、肝定向治疗(LDT)(4%)和依维莫司/其他药物(5%)。60 名患者接受二线治疗,包括 SSA 单药治疗(18%)或联合治疗(40%)、细胞毒性化疗(17%)、依维莫司(12%)、LDT(7%)、EBRT(3%)和其他治疗(3%)。首次一线治疗停药的中位时间如下:SSA,43.3;细胞毒性化疗,3.6。自治疗开始后研究者评估的进展的总体中位时间为 12.4。所有患者的中位总生存期(OS)为 66.4 个月,接受 SSA 治疗的患者为 81.5 个月。
SSA 单药或联合治疗是晚期肺 NET 的常用治疗方法。与其他晚期癌症患者相比,这些患者有更多的治疗选择,且生存时间相对较长。需要对新型治疗药物批准后的治疗模式进行评估。
生长抑素类似物(SSAs)、细胞毒性化疗、EBRT、肝定向治疗和靶向治疗是局部晚期/转移性(典型/非典型)肺神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)的常用治疗方法。SSA 单药或联合其他治疗方法是最常见的一线和二线治疗方法,其次是细胞毒性化疗。患者长期接受 SSA 治疗,中位治疗持续时间为 43 个月。所有患者首次接受一线治疗后的中位总生存期为 66 个月。鉴于最近美国食品和药物管理局批准了其他用于治疗肺 NET 的药物,且这些药物可能会纳入治疗方案,因此需要对本研究时间范围以外的治疗模式进行评估。