• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“驱动和取回”作为一种促进急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的合作方法的疗效。

Efficacy of 'drive and retrieve' as a cooperative method for prompt endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Aug;11(8):757-761. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014296. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014296
PMID:30610072
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke depend on the time interval from onset to reperfusion. Although the centralized 'mothership' method is considered preferable, the required transportation time increases the risk that a patient with a stroke may not receive intravenous or endovascular therapy. In contrast, 'drive and retrieve' describes a system wherein doctors from comprehensive stroke centers travel to primary stroke centers and provide endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the drive and retrieve system and verify the effects of this new collaboration on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke among facilities.

METHODS

This non-randomized, single-arm study retrospectively analyzed patients who met the inclusion criteria for endovascular treatment provided through a drive and retrieve system. Among the 122 patients treated by this system, we analyzed the time of onset to recanalization as the primary outcome. We also analyzed the efficacy of the drive and retrieve system using geographic information system analysis.

RESULTS

The median time from onset to recanalization was 229 min (IQR 170-307 min, 95% CI 201 to 252 min). The upper limit of the 95% CI for the time from onset to recanalization was shorter than the median times reported in two previous trials. Geographic information system analysis revealed an upward trend in the population coverage rate in each secondary medical area after the drive and retrieve method was introduced.

CONCLUSION

The drive and retrieve method may be an effective form of cooperation between facilities located within 1 hour of a comprehensive stroke center.

摘要

背景

血管内治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的结果取决于从发病到再灌注的时间间隔。虽然集中的“母舰”方法被认为是首选,但所需的转运时间增加了中风患者可能无法接受静脉或血管内治疗的风险。相比之下,“驱车接送”描述了一种综合卒中中心的医生前往初级卒中中心为急性缺血性脑卒中患者提供血管内治疗的系统。

目的

描述驱车接送系统,并验证这种新的合作对设施中急性缺血性脑卒中患者结局的影响。

方法

这项非随机、单臂研究回顾性分析了符合通过驱车接送系统进行血管内治疗的纳入标准的患者。在通过该系统治疗的 122 名患者中,我们将发病至再通时间作为主要结局进行分析。我们还使用地理信息系统分析评估了驱车接送系统的疗效。

结果

从发病到再通的中位数时间为 229 分钟(IQR 170-307 分钟,95%CI 201-252 分钟)。95%CI 上限时间从发病到再通的时间短于两项先前试验报告的中位数时间。地理信息系统分析显示,在引入驱车接送方法后,每个二级医疗区的人口覆盖范围呈上升趋势。

结论

驱车接送方法可能是距离综合卒中中心 1 小时以内的设施之间有效的合作形式。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of 'drive and retrieve' as a cooperative method for prompt endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.“驱动和取回”作为一种促进急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的合作方法的疗效。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Aug;11(8):757-761. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014296. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
2
Endovascular thrombectomy beyond 12 hours of stroke onset: a stroke network's experience of late intervention.血管内血栓切除术超过卒中发病后 12 小时:卒中网络的晚期介入经验。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Nov;10(11):1043-1046. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013575. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
3
Cost Effectiveness of Drive and Retrieve System in Hokkaido for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient Treatment Using Geographic Information System.北海道利用地理信息系统的急性缺血性脑卒中患者治疗中驱动与检索系统的成本效益
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Aug;28(8):2292-2301. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.05.020. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
4
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Strokes: Current US Access Paradigms and Optimization Methodology.急性缺血性脑卒中的血管内血栓切除术:目前美国的介入途径与优化方法。
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1207-1217. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028850. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
5
A standardized neurointerventional thrombectomy protocol leads to faster recanalization times.标准化的神经介入血栓切除术方案可缩短再通时间。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Nov;9(11):1035-1040. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012716. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
6
Limit of intraoperative near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring during endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术期间术中近红外光谱监测的局限性
Interv Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;24(1):57-63. doi: 10.1177/1591019917740101. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
7
Outcome Evaluation of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Single-Institution Experience in the Era of Randomized Controlled Trials.血管内血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性卒中患者的疗效评估:随机对照试验时代的单机构经验
World Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;99:593-598. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.054. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
8
The golden 35 min of stroke intervention with ADAPT: effect of thrombectomy procedural time in acute ischemic stroke on outcome.ADAPT 介入治疗的黄金 35 分钟:急性缺血性脑卒中取栓术时间对结局的影响。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Mar;10(3):213-220. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013040. Epub 2017 May 2.
9
Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis.血管内血栓切除术的治疗时间与缺血性中风的预后:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1279-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647.
10
Thromboaspiration technique as first approach for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: initial experience at nine Italian stroke centers.血栓抽吸技术作为急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗的首选方法:意大利九个卒中中心的初步经验
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jan;9(1):6-10. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012298. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A Short Review on Advances in Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Ischemic Stroke.缺血性脑卒中早期诊断与治疗进展简述
Galen Med J. 2023 Aug 21;12:e2993. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v12i0.2993. eCollection 2023.
2
Physician Transfer Versus Patient Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性缺血性脑卒中患者行机械取栓术时采用医师转运与患者转运的效果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 2;13(13):e031906. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031906. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
Outcomes and Issues of 'Drip and Go' as an Inter-Hospital Cooperation System in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.
“点滴即走”作为急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓术院际合作系统的结果与问题
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021;15(10):629-636. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0097. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
4
The efficacy of a visiting surgical service versus that of a hospital-based surgical service in providing endoscopic endonasal surgery to remove nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas in rural communities.农村地区经鼻内镜垂体腺瘤切除术中,巡回手术服务与医院内手术服务的疗效比较。
Pituitary. 2023 Aug;26(4):521-528. doi: 10.1007/s11102-023-01338-z. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
5
'Drive the doctor' for endovascular thrombectomy in a rural area: a simulation study.农村地区血管内血栓切除术的“推动医生”:一项模拟研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 20;23(1):778. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09672-5.
6
Clinical outcome, recanalization success, and time metrics in drip-and-ship vs. drive-the-doctor: A retrospective analysis of the HEI-LU-Stroke registry.静脉溶栓转运与医生随车转运的临床结局、再通成功率及时间指标:HEI-LU-卒中登记研究的回顾性分析
Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1142983. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1142983. eCollection 2023.
7
Telestroke networks for area-wide access to endovascular stroke treatment.用于在全区域范围内获得血管内卒中治疗的远程卒中网络。
Neurol Res Pract. 2023 Mar 3;5(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s42466-023-00237-9.
8
Feasibility, Safety, and Technical Success of the Flying Intervention Team in Acute Ischemic Stroke : Comparison of Interventions in Different Primary Stroke Centers with those in a Comprehensive Stroke Center.飞行介入团队在急性缺血性脑卒中中的可行性、安全性和技术成功率:不同初级卒中中心与综合卒中中心的介入治疗比较。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Jun;33(2):393-404. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01220-8. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
9
Spatial-temporal analysis of cerebral infarction mortality in Hokkaido, Japan: an ecological study using a conditional autoregressive model.日本北海道地区脑梗死死亡率的时空分析:使用条件自回归模型的生态研究
Int J Health Geogr. 2022 Oct 31;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12942-022-00316-1.
10
Influences of different referral modes on clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.不同转诊模式对急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗后临床结局的影响。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02751-w.