Parkinson D R
Department of Clinical Immunology and Biological Therapy, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.
Semin Oncol. 1988 Dec;15(6 Suppl 6):10-26.
Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is a true biological response modifier. Unlike alpha-interferon, which acts directly, IL-2 mediates its antitumor effects through complex indirect effects on the immune system. IL-2 used alone shows documented antitumor activity, which is both dose and schedule related. Antitumor activity may be increased by the use of either IL-2 in combination with other cytokines or monoclonal antibodies or both types of agents in combination with activated effector cytotoxic lymphocytes. In humans, data suggest that IL-2s rapid initial clearance is due to movement into an extravascular compartment from which IL-2 returns more slowly to the plasma. Toxicity appears to be due entirely to IL-2, rather than to transfused lymphocytes. IL-2 administered by continuous infusion is superior to bolus administration. However, at total daily-dose equivalence continuous infusion of IL-2 is both more toxic and more biologically active than bolus administration, with respect to the height of post-IL-2 rebound lymphocytosis, the generation of activated circulating lymphocytes, and lymphokine-activated killer-cell precursors. The question remains unresolved as to whether the toxicity of IL-2 therapy is necessary for the attainment of optimal clinical results. From currently available data, it appears that a minority of patients treated with IL-2 show clinically significant responses, and only 5% to 10% achieve durable complete responses. Nevertheless, these reproducible responses have occurred in tumors refractory to more conventional treatment. The reasons for non-response are unclear, but many avenues of investigation suggest that IL-2 therapy may be made both more active and more tolerable through the use of alternative doses and schedules and the use of IL-2 in combination with defined antitumor effector lymphocytes, with concomitant or sequential administration of other cytokines, or together with monoclonal antibodies.
白细胞介素-2(IL-2)是一种真正的生物反应调节剂。与直接起作用的α干扰素不同,IL-2通过对免疫系统产生复杂的间接作用来介导其抗肿瘤效应。单独使用IL-2已显示出有记录的抗肿瘤活性,这与剂量和给药方案有关。通过将IL-2与其他细胞因子或单克隆抗体联合使用,或这两类药物与活化的效应细胞毒性淋巴细胞联合使用,可增强抗肿瘤活性。在人类中,数据表明IL-2最初的快速清除是由于其进入血管外腔室,IL-2从该腔室返回血浆的速度较慢。毒性似乎完全归因于IL-2,而非输注的淋巴细胞。持续输注IL-2优于大剂量推注给药。然而,在每日总剂量等效的情况下,就IL-2后淋巴细胞增多反弹的高度、活化循环淋巴细胞的生成以及淋巴因子激活的杀伤细胞前体而言,持续输注IL-2比大剂量推注给药毒性更大且生物活性更强。关于IL-2治疗的毒性对于获得最佳临床效果是否必要这一问题仍未解决。从目前可得的数据来看,接受IL-2治疗的患者中似乎只有少数显示出临床显著反应,只有5%至10%的患者实现持久完全缓解。尽管如此,这些可重复的反应已出现在对更传统治疗难治的肿瘤中。无反应的原因尚不清楚,但许多研究途径表明,通过使用替代剂量和给药方案,以及将IL-2与明确的抗肿瘤效应淋巴细胞联合使用,同时或序贯给予其他细胞因子,或与单克隆抗体一起使用,IL-2治疗可能会更有效且更具耐受性。