Alshafai Nabeel S, Klepinowski Tomasz
Alshafai Neurosurgical Academy (ANA), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Neurosurgery, Collegium Medicum Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2019;125:171-174. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_25.
The term 'extreme lateral approach' (ELA) was first introduced by Sen and Sekhar relatively recently (in 1990). Its definition varies and remains controversial, but it generally entails more aggressive bony removal than the far lateral approach (FLA).
In this paper we review the relevant literature and weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. We propose methods to manage the complications resulting from the more invasive character of the ELA. Some modern trends regarding how to definitely distinguish the ELA from the FLA are also presented.
Using the PubMed database, literature was collected on the relevant topics and subsequently reviewed. All up-to-date tips and tricks were carefully gathered, and current morbidity and mortality rates were obtained, as well as further perspectives.
The morbidity associated with the ELA remains higher than that associated with the FLA, but the mortality nowadays is comparable. The ELA undoubtedly is a challenging procedure requiring deep insight into the relevant anatomy and its normal variants.
“极外侧入路”(ELA)这一术语是由森和塞卡尔于相对较近的时间(1990年)首次提出的。其定义各不相同且仍存在争议,但一般来说,与远外侧入路(FLA)相比,它需要更积极地去除骨质。
在本文中,我们回顾相关文献并权衡这种入路的优缺点。我们提出了处理因ELA更具侵入性而导致的并发症的方法。还介绍了一些关于如何明确区分ELA与FLA的现代趋势。
利用PubMed数据库收集相关主题的文献并随后进行综述。仔细收集了所有最新的技巧和窍门,获取了当前的发病率和死亡率以及进一步的展望。
与ELA相关的发病率仍然高于与FLA相关的发病率,但如今死亡率相当。ELA无疑是一个具有挑战性的手术,需要深入了解相关解剖结构及其正常变异。