Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, 50 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Dec;42(4):907-913. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-01069-x. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
To compare short-term and long-term surgical outcome patterns between anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) and laminoplasty (LP) in patients diagnosed with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and identify factors affecting surgical outcomes based on follow-up duration. During short-term follow-up period, surgical outcomes between ACCF and LP were similar. However, there were several reports that long-term surgical outcomes were superior in the ACCF compared with LP. Surgical outcomes between ACCF and LP according to follow-up period changed. This study enrolled 70 patients who underwent ACCF and 63 patients who underwent LP between 2005 and 2012. Patterns of surgical outcomes were analyzed in accordance with surgical procedures. Furthermore, these patients were divided into two subgroups in respect of follow-up duration: the short-term group (less than 48 months) and the long-term group (more than 48 months) group. Occupying ratio, type of OPLL, shape of ossified lesion, cervical sagittal alignment, grade of signal intensity on MRI, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were examined. Surgical outcomes of ACCF went into reverse at 48-month follow-up period. In the short-term group, JOA recovery rate had no difference between ACCF and LP. In the long-term group, the ACCF recovery rate (78.5 ± 31.0) was significantly higher than the LP recovery rate (48.4 ± 54.9) (P = 0.008). In the short-term group, old age (p = 0.011), hill shape (p = 0.013), and high grade of MRI signal intensity (p = 0.040) had negative effects on recovery rate. On the other hand, in the long-term group, LP (p = 0.021) and a high grade of MR signal intensity (p = 0.017) independently and negatively affected recovery rate. Long-term surgical outcomes of ACCF became better than those of LP at more than 48-month follow-up period. High-grade MRI signal changes and the LP surgical procedure were independent negative factors for long-term surgical outcomes in patients with OPLL. Direct decompression of the spinal cord with ACCF provides better long-term stable neurologic outcomes than LP.
比较颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)患者前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)和单开门椎管成形术(LP)的短期和长期手术效果,并根据随访时间确定影响手术效果的因素。短期随访期间,ACCF 和 LP 的手术效果相似。然而,有几项报道称,ACCF 的长期手术效果优于 LP。ACCF 和 LP 的手术效果随随访时间而变化。本研究纳入 2005 年至 2012 年间接受 ACCF 治疗的 70 例患者和接受 LP 治疗的 63 例患者。根据手术方式分析手术效果。此外,将这些患者按随访时间分为两组:短期组(<48 个月)和长期组(>48 个月)。检查占有率、OPLL 类型、骨化病变形状、颈椎矢状位排列、MRI 信号强度分级和日本矫形协会(JOA)评分。ACCF 的手术效果在 48 个月随访时发生逆转。在短期组中,ACCF 和 LP 之间的 JOA 恢复率无差异。在长期组中,ACCF 的恢复率(78.5±31.0)明显高于 LP 的恢复率(48.4±54.9)(P=0.008)。在短期组中,高龄(p=0.011)、山形(p=0.013)和高等级 MRI 信号强度(p=0.040)对恢复率有负面影响。另一方面,在长期组中,LP(p=0.021)和高等级的 MRI 信号强度(p=0.017)独立且负影响恢复率。ACCF 的长期手术效果在超过 48 个月的随访中好于 LP。在 OPLL 患者中,高等级的 MRI 信号改变和 LP 手术程序是长期手术效果的独立负性因素。ACCF 对脊髓的直接减压比 LP 提供更好的长期稳定神经学效果。