• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎后路纵韧带骨化症的前后路手术治疗选择:颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术与后路单开门椎管扩大成形术的临床疗效比较

Two-level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Open-door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Comparison of the Clinical Impact on the Occipito-Atlantoaxial Complex.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital and West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2024 Jul;16(7):1603-1613. doi: 10.1111/os.14092. Epub 2024 May 21.

DOI:10.1111/os.14092
PMID:38770906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11216837/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Both two-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (t-ACCF) and posterior open-door laminoplasty (ODLP) are effective surgical procedures for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Previous studies have identified different effects of different surgical procedures on the upper and subaxial cervical spine (UCS, SCS), however, there are no studies on the effects of t-ACCF and ODLP on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the changes in sagittal parameters and range of motion (ROM) of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex in OPLL patients treated with t-ACCF and ODLP.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that included 74 patients who underwent t-ACCF or ODLP for the treatment of OPLL from January 2012 to August 2022 at our institution. Preoperative, 3-month, and 1-year postoperative cervical neutral, flexion-extension, and lateral flexion radiographs were taken. Sagittal parameters including Cobb angle of C2-7, C0-2, C0-1, C1-2, C2 slope, and the ROM were measured. The clinical outcome was assessed using the JOA, VAS, and NDI scores preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Multiple linear regression was employed to identify factors influencing changes in UCS.

RESULTS

In the ODLP group, the SCS (C2-7) Cobb angle was significantly reduced (12.85 ± 10.0 to 7.68 ± 11.27; p < 0.05), and the UCS (C0-2) Cobb angle was significantly compensated for at 1 year postoperatively compared with the t-ACCF group (3.05 ± 4.09 vs 0.79 ± 2.62; p < 0.01). The SCS and lateral flexion ROM of the ODLP group was better maintained than t-ACCF (14.51 ± 6.00 vs 10.72 ± 3.79; 6.87 ± 4.56 vs 3.81 ± 1.67; p < 0.01). The compensatory increase in C0-2, C0-1, and C1-2 ROM was pronounced in both groups, especially in the ODLP group. The results of multiple linear regression showed that only the surgical procedure was a significant factor influencing UCS.

CONCLUSION

The loss of the SCS Cobb angle was more pronounced in ODLP relative to t-ACCF, resulting in a significant compensatory increase in UCS and atlantoaxial Cobb angle. The ROM of the UCS, atlantooccipital, and atlantoaxial joints was significantly increased in both groups, this may accelerate degenerative changes in the occipital-atlantoaxial complex, may leading to poorer outcomes in the long-term; of these, ODLP should receive more attention. In contrast, t-ACCF better maintains normal curvature of the SCS and occipito-atlantoaxial complex but loses more ROM.

摘要

目的

颈椎前路双节段椎体次全切除融合术(t-ACCF)和后路单开门椎管扩大成形术(ODLP)均为治疗后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)的有效手术方法。既往研究已经确定了不同手术方法对上颈椎(UCS)和下颈椎(SCS)的不同影响,但对于 t-ACCF 和 ODLP 对枕颈寰枢复合体的影响尚无研究。因此,本研究旨在比较 t-ACCF 和 ODLP 治疗 OPLL 患者后枕颈寰枢复合体矢状参数和运动范围(ROM)的变化。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月在我院接受 t-ACCF 或 ODLP 治疗的 74 例 OPLL 患者。术前、术后 3 个月和 1 年拍摄颈椎中立位、屈伸位和侧屈位 X 线片。测量矢状参数,包括 C2-7、C0-2、C0-1、C1-2、C2 斜率和 ROM。术前及术后 3 个月和 12 个月采用 JOA、VAS 和 NDI 评分评估临床疗效。采用多元线性回归分析影响 UCS 变化的因素。

结果

在 ODLP 组中,SCS(C2-7) Cobb 角显著减小(12.85°±10.0 至 7.68°±11.27°;p<0.05),与 t-ACCF 组相比,UCS(C0-2) Cobb 角在术后 1 年显著代偿(3.05°±4.09 至 0.79°±2.62°;p<0.01)。与 t-ACCF 组相比,ODLP 组 SCS 和侧屈 ROM 更好地维持(14.51°±6.00 至 10.72°±3.79;6.87°±4.56 至 3.81°±1.67;p<0.01)。两组患者的 C0-2、C0-1 和 C1-2 ROM 的代偿性增加均较为明显,尤其是 ODLP 组。多元线性回归结果显示,只有手术方式是影响 UCS 的显著因素。

结论

与 t-ACCF 相比,ODLP 导致 SCS Cobb 角丢失更为明显,导致 UCS 和寰枢 Cobb 角显著代偿性增加。两组患者的 UCS、寰枕和寰枢关节 ROM 均显著增加,这可能会加速枕颈寰枢复合体的退行性改变,可能导致长期预后较差;其中,ODLP 应受到更多关注。相比之下,t-ACCF 更好地维持了 SCS 和枕颈寰枢复合体的正常曲度,但丢失了更多的 ROM。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c27/11216837/2b80c9dd15f2/OS-16-1603-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c27/11216837/dbe3990f63dd/OS-16-1603-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c27/11216837/3cbf4025afa6/OS-16-1603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c27/11216837/4985d2c5683f/OS-16-1603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c27/11216837/2b80c9dd15f2/OS-16-1603-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c27/11216837/dbe3990f63dd/OS-16-1603-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c27/11216837/3cbf4025afa6/OS-16-1603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c27/11216837/4985d2c5683f/OS-16-1603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c27/11216837/2b80c9dd15f2/OS-16-1603-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Two-level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Open-door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Comparison of the Clinical Impact on the Occipito-Atlantoaxial Complex.颈椎后路纵韧带骨化症的前后路手术治疗选择:颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术与后路单开门椎管扩大成形术的临床疗效比较
Orthop Surg. 2024 Jul;16(7):1603-1613. doi: 10.1111/os.14092. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.颈椎后纵韧带骨化症行颈椎椎板成形术后颈椎矢状位对线与临床疗效的相关性
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):100-7. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE141004. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
3
Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与后路椎板成形术治疗后纵韧带骨化症所致压迫性脊髓病的Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1375-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5451-6. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
4
Influence of extending expansive open-door laminoplasty to C1 and C2 on cervical sagittal parameters.将扩大开门椎板切除术延伸至 C1 和 C2 对颈椎矢状参数的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 5;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3083-1.
5
The relationship between preoperative cervical sagittal balance and clinical outcome of laminoplasty treated cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament patients.术前颈椎矢状平衡与后路颈椎后纵韧带骨化症患者接受椎板成形术治疗的临床疗效的关系。
Spine J. 2020 Sep;20(9):1422-1429. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.542. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.动态因素对颈椎后纵韧带骨化症双开门椎板成形术后手术效果的影响
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):938-43. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE131197. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
7
Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes in cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.颈椎后纵韧带骨化症患者行颈椎板成形术与椎板切除术加融合术的临床和影像学结果比较。
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Oct;43(5):1409-1421. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01174-5. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
8
Relationship between T1 slope and loss of lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.颈椎后纵韧带骨化症患者椎板成形术后T1斜率与颈椎前凸丢失之间的关系
Spine J. 2016 Feb;16(2):219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.042. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
9
C3 laminectomy combined with modified unilateral laminoplasty and in situ reconstruction of the midline structures maintained cervical sagittal balance: a retrospective matched-pair case-control study.C3 椎板切除术联合改良单侧椎板成形术和中线结构原位重建维持颈椎矢状位平衡:一项回顾性配对病例对照研究。
Spine J. 2020 Sep;20(9):1403-1412. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 May 6.
10
Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty?接受钢板固定联合椎板成形术治疗的后纵韧带骨化症患者与颈椎病患者在活动范围、颈部疼痛和预后方面是否存在差异?
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(1):E9. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.FOCUS1394.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy and complications of 10 surgical interventions for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.10种手术治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化症的临床疗效及并发症:一项更新的系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 7;20(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05878-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity?成人颈椎畸形矫正手术中,新提出的C2和T1斜率重新排列目标能否弥合影像学成功与临床成功之间的差距?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Apr 15;37(3):368-375. doi: 10.3171/2022.2.SPINE211576. Print 2022 Sep 1.
2
Clinical impact of 3-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex: a retrospective study of patients who received a zero-profile anchored spacer versus cage-plate construct.3 水平颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)对枕寰枢复合体的临床影响:接受零切迹锚定间隔物与笼板结构的患者的回顾性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Dec;30(12):3656-3665. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06974-2. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
3
Flexion Dysfunction of Atlanto-Occipital Joint Associated with Cervical Spondylosis.寰枕关节屈伸功能障碍与颈椎病相关。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb;13(1):267-275. doi: 10.1111/os.12928. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
4
Upper cervical range of rotation during the flexion-rotation test is age dependent: an observational study.前屈-旋转试验中上颈椎旋转范围与年龄相关:一项观察性研究。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2020 Oct 31;12:1759720X20964139. doi: 10.1177/1759720X20964139. eCollection 2020.
5
Effect of posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty on cervical sagittal balance.颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术对颈椎矢状位平衡的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2831-2837. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06563-9. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
6
Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.单节段或双节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术后邻近节段退变的生物力学评估:有限元分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Jun;189:105352. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105352. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Comparison of Adjacent Segment Degeneration, Cervical Alignment, and Clinical Outcomes After One- and Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.单节段和多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段退变、颈椎排列及临床疗效的比较
Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):589-600. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938166.083. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与后路椎板成形术治疗后纵韧带骨化症所致压迫性脊髓病的Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1375-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5451-6. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
9
Restrictions of cervical flexion after laminoplasty increase in the mechanical stress at the occipitocervical junction in non-rheumatoid arthritis patients.在非类风湿性关节炎患者中,椎板成形术后颈椎前屈受限会增加枕颈交界处的机械应力。
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Nov;45:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Anterior decompression with fusion versus posterior decompression with fusion for massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a ≥50% canal occupying ratio: a multicenter retrospective study.前路减压融合术与后路减压融合术治疗椎管占位率≥50%的重度颈椎后纵韧带骨化症的多中心回顾性研究
Spine J. 2016 Nov;16(11):1351-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.07.532. Epub 2016 Aug 3.