• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 QLF 技术体外测量的自发荧光特性评估牙齿磨损。

Assessment of tooth wear based on autofluorescence properties measured using the QLF technology in vitro.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dentistry & Public Oral Health, BK21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orofacial Pain & Oral Medicine, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Mar;25:265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.01.001
PMID:30611863
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The difference in autofluorescence between enamel and dentine layer has prompted recommendations to use the quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) method for quantifying tooth wear (TW). This study investigated the potential of QLF for distinguishing the severity of occlusal TW based on differences in the autofluorescence intensity.

METHODS

In total, 106 extracted permanent molars and premolars having suspected wear without pulp exposure were used. The severity of wear was determined by visually examining all teeth using the tooth wear index (TWI) of Smith and Knight. QLF images were captured and converted into 8-bit grayscale images. The difference in the fluorescence intensity (ΔG) was calculated by comparing mean grayscale levels between sound and worn areas. Finally, histological examination was conducted by stereomicroscope to confirm the presence of dentine exposure.

RESULTS

100 teeth were included in the final analysis without six teeth having enamel cracks around worn area. The ΔG values increased with the severity of TW as quantified using conventional TWI codes, and differed significantly between the sound and enamel- and dentine-wear teeth (P < 0.001). The histology indicated that enamel remained on 57 teeth, while 43 teeth had dentine-exposed wear and showed significant differences in ΔG compared with enamel-remained teeth.

CONCLUSIONS

The fluorescence intensity differed significantly depending on the presence of dentine exposure. ΔG could be used to distinguish between sound and enamel- and dentine-wear teeth with a significant correlation. These findings indicate that QLF could be useful for determining the severity of TW of occlusal surfaces noninvasively.

摘要

背景

牙釉质和牙本质层之间的自发荧光差异促使人们建议使用定量光诱导荧光(QLF)方法来量化牙齿磨损(TW)。本研究旨在探讨 QLF 区分基于自发荧光强度差异的咬合面 TW 严重程度的潜力。

方法

共使用 106 颗无牙髓暴露的恒磨牙和前磨牙。使用 Smith 和 Knight 的牙齿磨损指数(TWI)对所有牙齿进行肉眼检查,以确定磨损的严重程度。采集 QLF 图像并转换为 8 位灰度图像。通过比较正常和磨损区域的平均灰度水平来计算荧光强度差异(ΔG)。最后,通过立体显微镜进行组织学检查以确认有无牙本质暴露。

结果

在最终分析中,有 100 颗牙齿被纳入研究,其中 6 颗牙齿因磨损区域周围有牙釉质裂纹而被排除。ΔG 值随着传统 TWI 代码量化的 TW 严重程度的增加而增加,且在正常和牙釉质磨损以及牙本质磨损的牙齿之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。组织学检查表明,有 57 颗牙齿的牙釉质仍然存在,而 43 颗牙齿的牙本质有磨损且其ΔG 值与牙釉质保留的牙齿存在显著差异。

结论

荧光强度与牙本质暴露的存在显著相关。ΔG 可用于区分正常和牙釉质磨损以及牙本质磨损的牙齿,且具有显著相关性。这些发现表明 QLF 可用于无创性确定咬合面 TW 的严重程度。

相似文献

1
Assessment of tooth wear based on autofluorescence properties measured using the QLF technology in vitro.基于 QLF 技术体外测量的自发荧光特性评估牙齿磨损。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Mar;25:265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
2
Evaluation of tooth wear by estimating enamel thickness with quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology.采用定量光致荧光技术估算牙釉质厚度评价牙齿磨损。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Mar;25:319-324. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
3
Quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology for quantitative evaluation of tooth wear.定量光诱导荧光技术定量评估牙齿磨损。
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Oct;22(12):1-6. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.12.121701.
4
Detection of dentin-exposed occlusal/incisal tooth wear using quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology.定量光诱导荧光技术检测牙本质暴露的咬合/切牙磨损。
J Dent. 2020 Dec;103:103505. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103505. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
5
Comparison of fluorescence parameters between three generations of QLF devices for detecting enamel caries in vitro and on smooth surfaces.三种 QLF 设备检测体外光滑面釉质龋的荧光参数比较。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Mar;25:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.11.019. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
6
Detection and Analysis of Enamel Cracks by Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence Technology.基于定量光诱导荧光技术的牙釉质裂纹检测与分析
J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
7
Comparative study to quantify demineralized enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced fluorescence techniques.使用激光和光诱导荧光技术对乳牙和恒牙中脱矿釉质进行定量的比较研究。
Caries Res. 2001 Nov-Dec;35(6):464-70. doi: 10.1159/000047491.
8
Occlusal tooth wear in patients of a dental school's prosthodontic department in Xi'an, China.中国西安某口腔医学院修复科患者的咬合性牙齿磨损。
Int J Prosthodont. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):54-60. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3642.
9
Quantification of incisal tooth wear in upper anterior teeth: conventional vs new method using toolmakers microscope and a three-dimensional measuring technique.上前牙切端磨损的量化:使用工具显微镜和三维测量技术的传统方法与新方法对比
J Dent. 2013 Dec;41(12):1214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.022. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
10
Enamel crack association with tooth age and wear severity: An optical coherence tomography study.牙釉质裂纹与牙齿年龄及磨损严重程度的关联:一项光学相干断层扫描研究。
Am J Dent. 2019 Feb;32(1):3-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert consensus on the prevention and treatment of enamel demineralization in orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗中牙釉质脱矿防治的专家共识
Int J Oral Sci. 2025 Mar 1;17(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00335-7.
2
Tooth Wear and Tribological Investigations in Dentistry.牙科中的牙齿磨损与摩擦学研究。
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Jun 9;2022:2861197. doi: 10.1155/2022/2861197. eCollection 2022.
3
Clinical Quantitative Evaluation of Tooth Wear: A 4-year Longitudinal Study.牙齿磨损的临床定量评估:一项为期4年的纵向研究。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Sep 4;18(4):719-729. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a45075.