Suppr超能文献

双氯芬酸脂质体透皮制剂的离体经皮吸收。

Ex vivo transdermal absorption of a liposome formulation of diclofenac.

机构信息

Across Barriers GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Unither Développement Bordeaux, Le Haillan, France.

出版信息

Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Mar;111:785-790. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.079. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

Abstract

Topical formulations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are often used to provide effective local drug concentration while limiting systemic exposure and associated adverse events. Formulation composition has great influence on the rate of transdermal drug transport through human skin. This study was performed to compare the ex vivo transdermal transport of diclofenac from three topical formulations, a 1% liposomal gel formulation of diclofenac sodium and two emulsion gel formulations, 1.16% and 2.32% diclofenac diethylamine (equivalent to 1% and 2% diclofenac sodium). Human skin was obtained during unrelated surgical procedures and frozen at -20 °C until use. Three skin specimens were thawed, prepared for testing, and placed in a Franz cell with the stratum corneum facing the donor compartment. About 200 μl of each formulation was placed on the skin, and the receptor compartment fluid (phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4, 32 °C) was sampled over the next 48 h. Diclofenac concentration was measured with a validated HPLC method. The transdermal permeability coefficient for the liposome 1% gel was 69.3 ± 14.4 10 cm•s, compared with 34.9 ± 9.1 10 cm•s (P = 0.001) and 47.1±9.5 10 cm•s (P = 0.005) for the emulsion gel 1.16% and emulsion gel 2.32%, respectively. A statistically significant difference between transdermal transport of diclofenac from the liposome gel 1% and the emulsion gel 1.16% was evident after 9 h, a clinically relevant result because these products are typically applied 2 to 4 times daily. Based on these observations, liposome gel 1% formulation of diclofenac may have a clinical advantage compared with the emulsion gel 1.16% formulation.

摘要

非甾体抗炎药的局部制剂常用于提供有效的局部药物浓度,同时限制全身暴露和相关的不良反应。制剂组成对药物通过人体皮肤的透皮速率有很大影响。本研究旨在比较三种局部制剂(1%脂溶性凝胶制剂的双氯芬酸钠和两种乳剂凝胶制剂,即 1.16%和 2.32%二乙胺双氯芬酸(相当于 1%和 2%双氯芬酸钠)中双氯芬酸的体外透皮传递。人类皮肤是在无关的手术过程中获得的,并在-20°C 下冷冻,直到使用。将三个皮肤标本解冻、准备测试并放置在 Franz 细胞中,角质层面向供体室。将每种制剂约 200μl 置于皮肤上,在接下来的 48 小时内取样受体室中的液体(磷酸盐缓冲盐水,pH7.4,32°C)。使用经过验证的 HPLC 方法测量双氯芬酸的浓度。与乳剂凝胶 1.16%和乳剂凝胶 2.32%的 34.9±9.1×10cm•s 和 47.1±9.5×10cm•s 相比,脂质体 1%凝胶的透皮渗透系数为 69.3±14.4×10cm•s(P=0.001)。在 9 小时后,脂质体凝胶 1%和乳剂凝胶 1.16%之间的双氯芬酸透皮传递存在统计学显著差异,这是一个具有临床意义的结果,因为这些产品通常每天应用 2 至 4 次。基于这些观察结果,与乳剂凝胶 1.16%制剂相比,双氯芬酸的脂质体凝胶 1%制剂可能具有临床优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验