Domínguez-Guerrero Saúl F, Muñoz Martha M, Pasten-Téllez David de Jesús, Arenas-Moreno Diego Miguel, Rodríguez-Miranda Luis Alberto, Manríquez-Morán Norma L, Méndez-de la Cruz Fausto Roberto
Laboratorio de Herpetología 2, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México; Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.
Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, 24060 Blacksburg, VA, USA.
J Therm Biol. 2019 Jan;79:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
Although the importance of thermoregulation and plasticity as compensatory mechanisms for climate change has long been recognized, they have largely been studied independently. Thus, we know comparatively little about how they interact to shape physiological variation in natural populations. Here, we test the hypothesis that behavioral thermoregulation and thermal acclimatization interact to shape physiological phenotypes in a natural population of the diurnal lizard, Sceloporus torquatus. Every month for one year we examined thermoregulatory effectiveness and changes in the population mean in three physiological parameters: cold tolerance (Ct), heat tolerance (Ct), and the preferred body temperature (T), to indirectly assess thermal acclimatization in population means. We discovered that S. torquatus is an active thermoregulator throughout the year, with body temperature varying little despite strong seasonal temperature shifts. Although we did not observe a strong signal of acclimatization in Ct, we did find that Ct shifts in parallel with nighttime temperatures throughout the year. This likely occurs, at least in part, because thermoregulation is substantially less effective at buffering organisms from selection on lower physiological limits than upper physiological limits. Active thermoregulation is effective at limiting exposure to extreme temperatures during the day, but is less effective at night, potentially contributing to greater plasticity in Ct than Ct. Importantly, however, T tracked seasonal changes in temperature, which is one the factors contributing to highly effective thermoregulation throughout the year. Thus, behavior and physiological plasticity do not always operate independently, which could impact how organisms can respond to rising temperatures.
尽管体温调节和可塑性作为应对气候变化的补偿机制的重要性早已得到认可,但它们在很大程度上是被独立研究的。因此,我们对它们如何相互作用以塑造自然种群中的生理变异了解相对较少。在这里,我们检验了一个假设,即行为体温调节和热适应相互作用,以塑造昼行性蜥蜴斯氏强棱蜥自然种群中的生理表型。在一年的时间里,我们每月都检查体温调节效率以及三个生理参数的种群平均值变化:耐寒性(Ct)、耐热性(Ct)和偏好体温(T),以间接评估种群平均值中的热适应情况。我们发现,斯氏强棱蜥全年都是活跃的体温调节者,尽管季节温度变化很大,但其体温变化很小。虽然我们在耐寒性方面没有观察到强烈的适应信号,但我们确实发现耐寒性全年都与夜间温度平行变化。这可能至少部分是因为在缓冲生物体免受较低生理极限而非较高生理极限的选择方面,体温调节的效果要差得多。白天,活跃的体温调节在限制暴露于极端温度方面是有效的,但夜间效果较差,这可能导致耐寒性比耐热性具有更大的可塑性。然而,重要的是,偏好体温跟踪温度的季节性变化,这是全年高效体温调节的因素之一。因此,行为和生理可塑性并不总是独立起作用,这可能会影响生物体对气温上升的反应方式。