• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灾难分诊中患者的伦理优先排序:当前证据的系统评价

Ethical prioritization of patients during disaster triage: A systematic review of current evidence.

作者信息

Ghanbari Vahid, Ardalan Ali, Zareiyan Armin, Nejati Amir, Hanfling Dan, Bagheri Alireza

机构信息

Health in Disaster and Emergencies Department, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Health in Disaster and Emergencies Department, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.

出版信息

Int Emerg Nurs. 2019 Mar;43:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2018.10.004. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2018.10.004
PMID:30612846
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Triage is a dynamic and complex decision-making process in order to determine priority of access to medical care in a disaster situation. The elements which should govern an ethical decision-making in prioritizing of victims have been debated for a long time. This paper aims to identify ethical principles guiding patient prioritization during disaster triage.

METHOD

Electronic databases were searched via structured search strategy from 1990 until July 2017. The studies investigating patients' prioritization in disaster situation were eligible for inclusion. All types of articles and guidelines were included.

RESULT

Of 7167 titles identified in the search, 35 studies were included. The important factors identified in patient prioritization were grouped into two categories: medical measures (medical need, likelihood of benefit and survivability) and Nonmedical measures (saving the most lives, youngest first, preserving function of society, protecting vulnerable groups, required resources and unbiased selection). Demographic characteristics, health status of patients, social value of patient, and unbiased selection are discriminatory factors in disaster triage.

CONCLUSION

Various factors have been introduced to consider ethical patient prioritization in disaster triage. Providers' engagement, public education, and ongoing training are required to reach a fair decision.

摘要

引言

在灾难情况下,分诊是一个动态且复杂的决策过程,旨在确定获得医疗救治的优先顺序。关于在确定受害者优先顺序时应指导伦理决策的要素,长期以来一直存在争议。本文旨在确定在灾难分诊期间指导患者优先排序的伦理原则。

方法

通过结构化搜索策略检索了1990年至2017年7月的电子数据库。纳入了调查灾难情况下患者优先排序的研究。纳入了所有类型的文章和指南。

结果

在检索到的7167个标题中,纳入了35项研究。在患者优先排序中确定的重要因素分为两类:医疗措施(医疗需求、受益可能性和生存能力)和非医疗措施(拯救最多生命、先救最年轻者、维护社会功能、保护弱势群体、所需资源和无偏选择)。人口统计学特征、患者的健康状况、患者的社会价值和无偏选择是灾难分诊中的歧视性因素。

结论

已引入各种因素来考虑灾难分诊中符合伦理的患者优先排序。需要医疗服务提供者的参与、公众教育和持续培训才能做出公平的决策。

相似文献

1
Ethical prioritization of patients during disaster triage: A systematic review of current evidence.灾难分诊中患者的伦理优先排序:当前证据的系统评价
Int Emerg Nurs. 2019 Mar;43:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2018.10.004. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
2
Fair prioritization of casualties in disaster triage: a qualitative study.公平优先化灾难分诊中的伤员:一项定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 13;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00515-2.
3
Perceptions on principle of priority setting in disaster triage: A Q-method study.灾难分诊中优先排序原则的认知:一项 Q 方法研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 Nov;59:101064. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101064. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
Ethical Guidance for Disaster Response, Specifically Around Crisis Standards of Care: A Systematic Review.灾害应对的伦理指导,特别是围绕危机护理标准:一项系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(9):e1-e9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303882. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
5
Disaster Ethics: Shifting Priorities in an Unstable and Dangerous Environment.灾难伦理学:在不稳定和危险的环境中调整优先事项。
Crit Care Clin. 2019 Oct;35(4):717-725. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
6
Making difficult ethical decisions in patient care during natural disasters and other mass casualty events.在自然灾害及其他大规模伤亡事件中,为患者护理做出艰难的伦理决策。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Aug;139(2):181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.04.027.
7
Setting Up a Just and Fair ICU Triage Process during a Pandemic: A Systematic Review.在大流行期间建立公正公平的重症监护病房分诊流程:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;12(2):146. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020146.
8
Mass casualty management of a large-scale bioterrorist event: an epidemiological approach that shapes triage decisions.大规模生物恐怖事件的大规模伤亡管理:一种影响分诊决策的流行病学方法。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2002 May;20(2):409-36. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(01)00008-6.
9
Unstable ethical plateaus and disaster triage.不稳定的伦理平衡点与灾难分诊
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006 Aug;24(3):749-68. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2006.05.016.
10
Pediatric ventilation in a disaster: clinical and ethical decision making.灾难中的儿科通气:临床与伦理决策。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):603-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232e222.

引用本文的文献

1
Public perspectives on COVID-19 triage protocols for access to critical care in extreme pandemic context.公众对极端疫情背景下新冠病毒病危重症救治分流方案的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 17;19(12):e0314460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314460. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of the Nationwide Avastin Ban at a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital in Pakistan.巴基斯坦一家三级眼科护理医院全国范围内阿瓦斯汀禁令的影响。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 23;16(7):e65199. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65199. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
COVID-19 critical care triage across Canada: a narrative synthesis and ethical analysis of early provincial triage protocols.
加拿大 COVID-19 重症监护分诊:对早期省级分诊方案的叙述性综合和伦理分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;71(8):1126-1136. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02744-y. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
4
A scoping review of post-earthquake healthcare for vulnerable groups of the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquakes.2023 年土耳其-叙利亚地震后弱势群体医疗保健的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18395-z.
5
Setting Up a Just and Fair ICU Triage Process during a Pandemic: A Systematic Review.在大流行期间建立公正公平的重症监护病房分诊流程:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;12(2):146. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020146.
6
Evaluation of Urgent Retinal Practice and Safety Measures for Physicians and Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间医生和患者紧急视网膜诊疗实践及安全措施评估
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 21;16:1197-1205. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S355628. eCollection 2022.
7
Consciousness Detection on Injured Simulated Patients Using Manual and Automatic Classification via Visible and Infrared Imaging.利用可见和红外成像进行手动和自动分类对受伤模拟患者进行意识检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 18;21(24):8455. doi: 10.3390/s21248455.
8
Triage Training in Iran from 2010 to 2020: A Systematic Review on Educational Intervention Studies.2010年至2020年伊朗的分诊培训:教育干预研究的系统评价
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2021 May 17;26(3):189-195. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_155_20. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.
9
Delayed Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy for Patients During the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Ethical Endeavor.COVID-19封锁期间为患者提供延迟玻璃体内抗VEGF治疗:一项符合伦理的努力。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 17;15:661-669. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S289068. eCollection 2021.
10
Decision Model for Allocation of Intensive Care Unit Beds for Suspected COVID-19 Patients under Scarce Resources.疑似 COVID-19 患者在稀缺资源下的重症监护病房床位分配决策模型。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Jan 27;2021:8853787. doi: 10.1155/2021/8853787. eCollection 2021.