• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0.5%洗必泰/70%酒精和1%碘/70%酒精均可降低足部清洁手术中的细菌载量:一项随机对照试验

Chlorhexidine 0.5%/70% Alcohol and Iodine 1%/70% Alcohol Both Reduce Bacterial Load in Clean Foot Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Shadid Marwan B, Speth Mario J G M, Voorn G Paul, Wolterbeek Nienke

机构信息

Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.

Medical Doctor and Microbiologist, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Mar;58(2):278-281. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.042. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.042
PMID:30612875
Abstract

No consensus exists regarding which cleansing technique, solution, and concentration should be used in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this randomized, controlled trial was to compare the effect of chlorhexidine 0.5%/70% alcohol with iodine 1%/70% alcohol on lowering positive cultures before elective foot surgery and to study any wound complications, infections and allergic reactions. Consecutive patients ≥18 years of age scheduled for a hallux valgus correction or arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint were included. Swabs were taken from 2 sites before and twice after preparing the skin and were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. The study group consisted of 49 patients with a mean age of 52.3 ± 14.4 (range 22 to 75) years of whom 42 (86%) were female. No significant differences were observed for positive cultures between the chlorhexidine (73%, 2%, and 12%) and iodine (68%, 7%, and 9%) group at any time point. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most commonly isolated micro-organisms found after skin preparation. Occasionally, Bacillus spp and Corynebacterium spp were cultured. The complication rate 2 weeks postoperatively was 0% in the chlorhexidine group versus 8.7% (n = 2) in the iodine group (delayed wound healing; p = .215). The complication rate at 6 weeks postoperatively was, respectively, 3.8% (n = 1) versus 4.3% (n = 1; both showed swelling and redness; p > .999). There was no significant difference in postoperative wound problems or infection rates between the 2 skin preparation solutions. Chlorhexidine 0.5%/70% alcohol and iodine 1%/70% alcohol both decreased the amount of positive cultures in elective foot surgery.

摘要

关于在骨科手术中应使用哪种清洁技术、溶液和浓度,目前尚无共识。这项随机对照试验的目的是比较0.5%洗必泰/70%酒精与1%碘/70%酒精在择期足部手术前降低阳性培养物的效果,并研究任何伤口并发症、感染和过敏反应。纳入了计划进行拇外翻矫正或第一跖趾关节融合术的18岁及以上连续患者。在皮肤准备前和准备后两次从2个部位采集拭子,并进行定量和定性分析。研究组由49例患者组成,平均年龄为52.3±14.4岁(范围22至75岁),其中42例(86%)为女性。在任何时间点,洗必泰组(73%、2%和12%)和碘组(68%、7%和9%)之间的阳性培养物均未观察到显著差异。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌是皮肤准备后最常分离出的微生物。偶尔会培养出芽孢杆菌属和棒状杆菌属。洗必泰组术后2周的并发症发生率为0%,而碘组为8.7%(n = 2;伤口愈合延迟;p = 0.215)。术后6周的并发症发生率分别为3.8%(n = 1)和4.3%(n = 1;均表现为肿胀和发红;p > 0.999)。两种皮肤准备溶液在术后伤口问题或感染率方面没有显著差异。0.5%洗必泰/70%酒精和1%碘/70%酒精在择期足部手术中均降低了阳性培养物的数量。

相似文献

1
Chlorhexidine 0.5%/70% Alcohol and Iodine 1%/70% Alcohol Both Reduce Bacterial Load in Clean Foot Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.0.5%洗必泰/70%酒精和1%碘/70%酒精均可降低足部清洁手术中的细菌载量:一项随机对照试验
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Mar;58(2):278-281. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.042. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
2
Randomized, Prospective Study of the Order of Preoperative Preparation Solutions for Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Surgery.足踝矫形手术患者术前准备溶液使用顺序的随机前瞻性研究。
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 May;37(5):478-82. doi: 10.1177/1071100715623037. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
3
Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus iodine-alcohol for surgical site skin preparation in an elective arthroplasty (ACAISA) study: a cluster randomized controlled trial.氯己定-酒精与碘-酒精用于择期关节置换术部位皮肤准备的比较(ACAISA)研究:一项整群随机对照试验。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Oct;25(10):1239-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
4
A comparison of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for eliminating skin flora before genitourinary prosthetic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.氯己定-酒精与聚维酮碘在消除泌尿生殖系统假体手术前皮肤菌群中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):136-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.086. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
5
A retrospective analysis of surgical site infections after chlorhexidine-alcohol versus iodine-alcohol for pre-operative antisepsis.氯己定醇与碘伏醇用于术前消毒后手术部位感染的回顾性分析
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Jun;15(3):310-3. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.185. Epub 2014 May 5.
6
Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in lumbar spine surgery.脊柱手术中外科准备溶液的疗效。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):490-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00471.
7
Effect of Surgical Skin Antisepsis on Surgical Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.妇科腹腔镜手术中术野皮肤消毒对手术部位感染的影响:一项双盲随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Sep 1;155(9):807-815. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1953.
8
Chlorhexidine with isopropyl alcohol versus iodine povacrylex with isopropyl alcohol and alcohol- versus nonalcohol-based skin preparations: the incidence of and readmissions for surgical site infections after colorectal operations.氯己定与异丙醇组合制剂对比聚维酮碘与异丙醇组合制剂以及酒精基与非酒精基皮肤准备:结直肠手术后手术部位感染的发生率及再入院情况
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jun;58(6):588-96. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000379.
9
A randomized open-label controlled trial of chlorhexidine-alcohol vs povidone-iodine for cesarean antisepsis: the CAPICA trial.氯己定-酒精与聚维酮碘用于剖宫产术皮肤消毒的随机开放标签对照试验:CAPICA试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):463.e1-463.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.060. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
10
Antisepsis of the skin before spinal surgery with povidone iodine-alcohol followed by chlorhexidine gluconate-alcohol povidone iodine-alcohol applied twice for the prevention of contamination of the wound by bacteria: a randomised controlled trial.脊柱手术前先用聚维酮碘 - 酒精进行皮肤消毒,随后用葡萄糖酸洗必泰 - 酒精,聚维酮碘 - 酒精应用两次以预防伤口细菌污染:一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Oct;99-B(10):1354-1365. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2017-0291.R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of different preoperative antiseptics in preventing a risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同术前防腐剂预防手术部位感染风险的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Jul 23;19(3):308-324. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2024.17885. eCollection 2024 Oct 16.
2
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of preoperative skin preparation with alcoholic chlorhexidine compared to povidone iodine in orthopedic surgery.术前使用酒精洗必泰皮肤准备与聚维酮碘在骨科手术中的疗效的荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 20;11(1):18634. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97838-8.
3
Worldwide survey of Corynebacterium striatum increasingly associated with human invasive infections, nosocomial outbreak, and antimicrobial multidrug-resistance, 1976-2020.
1976 - 2020年全球范围内与人类侵袭性感染、医院感染暴发及抗菌药物多重耐药性日益相关的纹带棒状杆菌调查
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Jul;203(5):1863-1880. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02246-1. Epub 2021 Feb 24.