• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别中学生在基于计算思维的科学学习中的挑战。

Identifying middle school students' challenges in computational thinking-based science learning.

作者信息

Basu Satabdi, Biswas Gautam, Sengupta Pratim, Dickes Amanda, Kinnebrew John S, Clark Douglas

机构信息

SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, California, 94025 USA.

2Institute for Software Integrated Systems and EECS Department, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212 USA.

出版信息

Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2016;11(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41039-016-0036-2. Epub 2016 May 21.

DOI:10.1186/s41039-016-0036-2
PMID:30613246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6302855/
Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) parallels the core practices of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and is believed to effectively support students' learning of science and math concepts. However, despite the synergies between CT and STEM education, integrating the two to support synergistic learning remains an important challenge. Relatively, little is known about how a student's conceptual understanding develops in such learning environments and the difficulties they face when learning with such integrated curricula. In this paper, we present a research study with CTSiM (Computational Thinking in Simulation and Modeling)-computational thinking-based learning environment for K-12 science, where students build and simulate computational models to study and gain an understanding of science processes. We investigate a set of core challenges (both computational and science domain related) that middle school students face when working with CTSiM, how these challenges evolve across different modeling activities, and the kinds of support provided by human observers that help students overcome these challenges. We identify four broad categories and 14 subcategories of challenges and show that the human-provided scaffolds help reduce the number of challenges students face over time. Finally, we discuss our plans to modify the CTSiM interfaces and embed scaffolding tools into CTSiM to help students overcome their various programming, modeling, and science-related challenges and thus gain a deeper understanding of the science concepts.

摘要

计算思维(CT)与科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育的核心实践并行,并且被认为能有效支持学生对科学和数学概念的学习。然而,尽管CT与STEM教育之间存在协同作用,但将两者整合以支持协同学习仍然是一项重大挑战。相对而言,对于学生在这种学习环境中的概念理解如何发展以及他们在使用这种整合课程学习时所面临的困难,我们了解得还很少。在本文中,我们展示了一项针对CTSiM(模拟与建模中的计算思维)——一种用于K-12科学教育的基于计算思维的学习环境——的研究,在该环境中,学生构建并模拟计算模型以研究科学过程并加深理解。我们调查了中学生在使用CTSiM时面临的一系列核心挑战(包括与计算和科学领域相关的挑战)、这些挑战在不同建模活动中的演变情况,以及人类观察者提供的何种支持能帮助学生克服这些挑战。我们识别出了四大类共14个子类别的挑战,并表明随着时间推移,人为提供的支架有助于减少学生面临的挑战数量。最后,我们讨论了修改CTSiM界面并将支架工具嵌入CTSiM的计划,以帮助学生克服他们在编程、建模以及与科学相关的各种挑战,从而更深入地理解科学概念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/f405f0e47eae/41039_2016_36_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/ad8cc6899487/41039_2016_36_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/e393a9ad3734/41039_2016_36_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/941bcb6ae93a/41039_2016_36_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/d860184f1052/41039_2016_36_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/58baea8cbd00/41039_2016_36_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/cc0363df3130/41039_2016_36_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/d0b5c2ae159f/41039_2016_36_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/5e86ab780814/41039_2016_36_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/f405f0e47eae/41039_2016_36_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/ad8cc6899487/41039_2016_36_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/e393a9ad3734/41039_2016_36_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/941bcb6ae93a/41039_2016_36_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/d860184f1052/41039_2016_36_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/58baea8cbd00/41039_2016_36_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/cc0363df3130/41039_2016_36_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/d0b5c2ae159f/41039_2016_36_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/5e86ab780814/41039_2016_36_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83e2/6302855/f405f0e47eae/41039_2016_36_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying middle school students' challenges in computational thinking-based science learning.识别中学生在基于计算思维的科学学习中的挑战。
Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2016;11(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41039-016-0036-2. Epub 2016 May 21.
2
Computational Thinking and Educational Robotics Integrated into Project-Based Learning.计算思维与教育机器人融入项目式学习。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 14;22(10):3746. doi: 10.3390/s22103746.
3
Development of a Pandemic Awareness STEM Outreach Curriculum: Utilizing a Computational Thinking Taxonomy Framework.大流行意识STEM外展课程的开发:利用计算思维分类框架
Educ Sci (Basel). 2021 Mar;11(3). doi: 10.3390/educsci11030109. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
4
Promoting learning transfer in science through a complexity approach and computational modeling.通过复杂性方法和计算建模促进科学学习的迁移。
Instr Sci. 2023;51(3):475-507. doi: 10.1007/s11251-023-09624-w. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
5
Mathematics education and students with learning disabilities: introduction to the special series.数学教育与学习障碍学生:特刊引言
J Learn Disabil. 1997 Jan-Feb;30(1):2-19, 68. doi: 10.1177/002221949703000101.
6
The Effectiveness of Teacher Support for Students' Learning of Artificial Intelligence Popular Science Activities.教师支持对学生人工智能科普活动学习的有效性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 3;13:868623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.868623. eCollection 2022.
7
Think3d!: Improving mathematics learning through embodied spatial training.Think3d!:通过具身空间训练提升数学学习效果。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0052-9. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
8
Effects of the Problem-Oriented Learning Model on Middle School Students' Computational Thinking Skills in a Python Course.问题导向学习模式对中学生Python课程计算思维技能的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 7;12:771221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771221. eCollection 2021.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Algorithmic Explanations: an Unplugged Instructional Approach to Integrate Science and Computational Thinking.算法解释:一种融合科学与计算思维的非插电式教学方法。
J Sci Educ Technol. 2022;31(4):428-441. doi: 10.1007/s10956-022-09965-0. Epub 2022 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Algorithmic Explanations: an Unplugged Instructional Approach to Integrate Science and Computational Thinking.算法解释:一种融合科学与计算思维的非插电式教学方法。
J Sci Educ Technol. 2022;31(4):428-441. doi: 10.1007/s10956-022-09965-0. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
Developing Computational Thinking Teaching Strategies to Model Pandemics and Containment Measures.开发计算思维教学策略,以模拟疫情和控制措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 28;18(23):12520. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312520.
3
A classroom SNS to promote reflective activity in programming learning for children.

本文引用的文献

1
Computational thinking and thinking about computing.计算思维与对计算的思考。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008 Oct 28;366(1881):3717-25. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118.
2
The role of tutoring in problem solving.辅导在解决问题中的作用。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1976 Apr;17(2):89-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.
一个促进儿童编程学习中反思性活动的课堂社交网络服务。
Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018;13(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41039-018-0069-9. Epub 2018 Apr 10.