Suppr超能文献

内镜检查的镇静:咪达唑仑或地西泮与哌替啶?

Sedation for endoscopy: midazolam or diazepam and pethidine?

作者信息

Boldy D A, Lever L R, Unwin P R, Spencer P A, Hoare A M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Wycombe General Hospital, High Wycombe, Bucks.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1988 Dec;61(6):698-701. doi: 10.1093/bja/61.6.698.

Abstract

One hundred patients received either diazepam given with pethidine, antagonized with naloxone, or midazolam alone in a double-blind randomized study of sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Midazolam produced better amnesia for the procedure (P less than 0.0001) but diazepam and pethidine resulted in less retching during the procedure (P less than 0.01) and less sedation after the procedure, as judged by a simple performance test (P less than 0.02) and patient recall of results (P less than 0.02).

摘要

在一项关于上消化道内镜检查镇静的双盲随机研究中,100名患者分别接受了地西泮与哌替啶联用并以纳洛酮拮抗、或单独使用咪达唑仑的治疗。咪达唑仑对该操作产生了更好的遗忘效果(P<0.0001),但地西泮和哌替啶在操作过程中导致的干呕较少(P<0.01),且操作后镇静程度较轻,这通过一项简单的性能测试(P<0.02)和患者对结果的回忆(P<0.02)来判断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验