Facchinetti Fabio, Orrù Beatrice, Grandi Giovanni, Unfer Vittorio
a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult , Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia , Modena , Italy.
b Department of Medical Affairs , Lo.Li. Pharma , Rome , Italy.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Mar;35(3):198-206. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1540578. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Metformin (MET), the most commonly used insulin sensitizer, is the reference off-label drug for the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), worldwide. However, its use may be limited mainly by gastrointestinal adverse effects. Myo-inositol (MI), a well-recognized food supplement, also represents an evidence-based treatment for PCOS women, popular in many countries. Our aim is to provide a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis which compares these two treatments, for their short-term efficacy and safety in PCOS patients. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RCTs were identified from 1994 through 2017 using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and ResearchGate. Included studies were limited to those one directly comparing MET to MI on several hormones changes. Standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated. Changes in fasting insulin was the main outcome of measure. Six trials with a total of 355 patients were included. At the end of treatment, no difference between MET and MI was found on fasting insulin (SMD=0.08 µU/ml, 95% CI: -0.31-0.46, p=.697), HOMA index (SMD =0.17, 95% CI: -0.53-0.88, p=.635), testosterone (SMD= -0.01, 95% CI: -0.24-0.21, p=.922), SHBG levels (SMD= -0.50 nmol/l, 95% CI: -1.39-0.38, p=.263) and body mass index (BMI) (SMD= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.60-0.16, p=.265). There was strong evidence of an increased risk of adverse events among women receiving MET compared to those receiving MI (RR =5.17, 95% CI: 2.91-9.17, p<.001). No differences were found in the effect of MET and MI on short-term hormone changes. The better tolerability of MI makes it more acceptable for the recovery of androgenic and metabolic profile in PCOS women.
二甲双胍(MET)是最常用的胰岛素增敏剂,在全球范围内是治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的参考性非标签药物。然而,其使用可能主要受到胃肠道不良反应的限制。肌醇(MI)是一种广为人知的食品补充剂,也是PCOS女性的一种循证治疗方法,在许多国家都很流行。我们的目的是对文献进行系统综述和荟萃分析,比较这两种治疗方法在PCOS患者中的短期疗效和安全性。对随机临床试验(RCT)进行系统综述和荟萃分析。使用MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和ResearchGate从1994年至2017年识别RCT。纳入的研究仅限于那些直接比较MET和MI对几种激素变化影响的研究。计算标准化平均差(SMD)或风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。空腹胰岛素变化是主要测量结果。纳入了6项试验,共355例患者。治疗结束时,在空腹胰岛素(SMD = 0.08 μU/ml,95% CI:-0.31 - 0.46,p = 0.697)、HOMA指数(SMD = 0.17,95% CI:-0.53 - 0.88,p = 0.635)、睾酮(SMD = -0.01,95% CI:-0.24 - 0.21,p = 0.922)、性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)水平(SMD = -0.50 nmol/l,95% CI:-1.39 - 0.38,p = 0.263)和体重指数(BMI)(SMD = -0.22,95% CI:-0.60 - 0.16,p = 0.265)方面,未发现MET和MI之间存在差异。有强有力的证据表明,与接受MI的女性相比,接受MET的女性发生不良事件的风险增加(RR = 5.17,95% CI:2.91 - 9.17,p < 0.001)。在MET和MI对短期激素变化的影响方面未发现差异。MI更好的耐受性使其在PCOS女性恢复雄激素和代谢状况方面更易被接受。