• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从基本特质角度看健康人格。

The healthy personality from a basic trait perspective.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis.

School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jun;118(6):1207-1225. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000231. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1037/pspp0000231
PMID:30614724
Abstract

What basic personality traits characterize the psychologically healthy individual? The purpose of this article was to address this question by generating an expert-consensus model of the healthy person in the context of the 30 facets (and 5 domains) of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1992) system of traits. In a first set of studies, we found that the healthy personality can be described, with a high level of agreement, in terms of the 30 facets of the NEO-PI-R. High levels of openness to feelings, positive emotions, and straightforwardness, together with low levels on facets of neuroticism, were particularly indicative of healthy personality functioning. The expert-generated healthy personality profile was negatively correlated with profiles of pathological personality functioning and positively correlated with normative personality functioning. In a second set of studies, we matched the NEO-PI-R profiles of over 3,000 individuals from 7 different samples with the expert-generated healthy prototype to yield a healthy personality index. This index was characterized by good retest reliability and cross-rater agreement, high rank-order stability, and substantial heritability. Individuals with high scores on the healthy personality index were psychologically well-adjusted, had high self-esteem, good self-regulatory skills, an optimistic outlook on the world, and a clear and stable self-view. These individuals were low in aggression and meanness, unlikely to exploit others, and were relatively immune to stress and self-sufficient. We discuss the results in the light of their implications for both research and theory on healthy personality functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

什么样的基本人格特质可以描绘出心理健康的个体?本文旨在通过生成一个在修订版 NEO 人格量表(NEO-PI-R)的 30 个特质(和 5 个维度)背景下健康个体的专家共识模型来回答这个问题(Costa & McCrae, 1992)。在一系列研究中,我们发现健康人格可以用 NEO-PI-R 的 30 个特质来高度一致地描述。高水平的开放感受、积极情绪和直率,以及低水平的神经质特质,尤其能表明健康的人格功能。专家生成的健康人格特征与病理性人格特征的特征呈负相关,与正常人格特征呈正相关。在另一组研究中,我们将来自 7 个不同样本的 3000 多人的 NEO-PI-R 特征与专家生成的健康原型进行匹配,得出健康人格指数。这个指数的特点是重测信度和跨评分者一致性好,等级稳定性高,遗传度高。健康人格指数得分高的个体心理适应良好,自尊心高,自我调节能力强,对世界持乐观态度,自我形象清晰稳定。这些人攻击性和卑鄙性较低,不太可能利用他人,并且相对不受压力和自给自足的影响。我们将根据这些结果对健康人格功能的研究和理论意义进行讨论。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
The healthy personality from a basic trait perspective.从基本特质角度看健康人格。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jun;118(6):1207-1225. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000231. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
2
Personality development and adjustment in college: A multifaceted, cross-national view.大学生人格发展与调适:多元、跨国视角。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Aug;115(2):338-361. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000205.
3
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Predicting dimensions of personality disorder from domains and facets of the Five-Factor Model.从五因素模型的领域和层面预测人格障碍的维度
J Pers. 2001 Apr;69(2):199-222. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00142.
5
Describing depressive personality analogues and dysthymics on the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised.在《修订版大五人格量表》上描述抑郁性人格类似物和恶劣心境者。
J Clin Psychol. 2000 Dec;56(12):1521-34. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(200012)56:12<1521::AID-4>3.0.CO;2-I.
6
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中替代人格障碍模型特质作为五因素模型的适应不良极端变体:一项项目反应理论分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):343-54. doi: 10.1037/abn0000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
7
Prospective prediction of college adjustment using self- and informant-rated personality traits.采用自评和他人评定的人格特质对大学生适应情况进行前瞻性预测。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(6):630-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.672506. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
8
Personality characteristics below facets: A replication and meta-analysis of cross-rater agreement, rank-order stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances.人格特质以下方面:跨评价者一致性、等级稳定性、遗传性和人格细微差异效用的复制和元分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;117(4):e35-e50. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000202. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
9
Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances.人格特质细分之下:人格细微差异的共识效度、纵向稳定性、遗传性及效用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Mar;112(3):474-490. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000100. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
10
Method biases in single-source personality assessments.单源人格评估中的方法偏差。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1160-1173. doi: 10.1037/pas0000566. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Reliability and Model Fit of the 13-Item and 10-Item Big Five Inventory (Malay Version) among Malaysian Firefighters.评估马来西亚消防员中13项和10项大五人格量表(马来语版)的信度和模型拟合度。
Malays J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;31(4):185-194. doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.15. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Evaluating the complete (44-item), short (20-item) and ultra-short (10-item) versions of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) in the Brazilian population.评估巴西人群中大五人格量表(BFI)的完整(44 项)、简短(20 项)和超短(10 项)版本。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 5;13(1):7372. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34504-1.
3
Founder personality and entrepreneurial outcomes: A large-scale field study of technology startups.
创始人个性与创业成果:一项针对科技创业公司的大规模实地研究。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 9;120(19):e2215829120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215829120. Epub 2023 May 1.
4
Effect of Personality Type on the Occurrence of Temporomandibular Disorders-A Cross-Sectional Study.人格类型对颞下颌关节紊乱发生的影响:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 26;20(1):352. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010352.
5
Concurrent, Convergent, and Discriminant Validity of the Section III Psychopathy Specifier.第三节精神变态特质的同时效度、收敛效度和判别效度。
Assessment. 2023 Sep;30(6):1790-1810. doi: 10.1177/10731911221124344. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
6
Emognition dataset: emotion recognition with self-reports, facial expressions, and physiology using wearables.Emognition 数据集:使用可穿戴设备进行自我报告、面部表情和生理信号的情绪识别。
Sci Data. 2022 Apr 7;9(1):158. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01262-0.
7
Refining the maturity principle of personality development by examining facets, close others, and comaturation.通过考察人格发展的各个方面、亲近他人和共同成长来完善成熟原则。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):942-958. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000400. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
8
The impact of childhood lead exposure on adult personality: Evidence from the United States, Europe, and a large-scale natural experiment.儿童期铅暴露对成年人个性的影响:来自美国、欧洲和大规模自然实验的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 20;118(29). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020104118.
9
A longitudinal study on perceived health in cardiovascular patients: The role of conscientiousness, subjective wellbeing and cardiac self-efficacy.心血管病患者感知健康的纵向研究:尽责性、主观幸福感和心脏自我效能的作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223862. eCollection 2019.