• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Refining the maturity principle of personality development by examining facets, close others, and comaturation.通过考察人格发展的各个方面、亲近他人和共同成长来完善成熟原则。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):942-958. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000400. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
Facet-level personality development in the transition to adolescence: Maturity, disruption, and gender differences.青少年期过渡阶段的面孔层面人格发展:成熟、破坏和性别差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Nov;121(5):1095-1111. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000367. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Personality development and adjustment in college: A multifaceted, cross-national view.大学生人格发展与调适:多元、跨国视角。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Aug;115(2):338-361. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000205.
4
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
Domain and facet personality predictors of all-cause mortality among Medicare patients aged 65 to 100.65至100岁医疗保险患者全因死亡率的领域和层面人格预测因素
Psychosom Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;67(5):724-33. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000181272.58103.18.
6
The development of personality-From metatraits to facets-Across adolescence and into adulthood in a sample of Mexican-origin youth.人格发展——从特质元到特质面——在墨西哥裔青少年样本中跨越青春期到成年期。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Jun;126(6):1140-1160. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000487. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
7
Codevelopment of life goals and the Big Five personality traits across adulthood and old age.成年期和老年期生命目标与大五人格特质的共同发展。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Feb;126(2):346-368. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000477. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
8
Mortality Risk Associated With Personality Facets of the Big Five and Interpersonal Circumplex Across Three Aging Cohorts.与五大人格特质和人际双相情感维度的人格特质相关的死亡风险横跨三个老龄化队列。
Psychosom Med. 2020 Jan;82(1):64-73. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000756.
9
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
The Predictive Validity of Consensual and Unique Facets of Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness in Five Personality Inventories.神经质、尽责性和宜人性的共识性与独特性方面在五个人格量表中的预测效度
Assessment. 2023 Jun;30(4):1182-1199. doi: 10.1177/10731911221089037. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The contribution of socio-demographic, health-related and psychological factors to the perception of changes in life following a few waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.社会人口学、健康相关及心理因素对经历几波新冠疫情大流行后生活变化感知的影响。
Health Psychol Rep. 2024 Aug 19;13(2):178-190. doi: 10.5114/hpr/189699. eCollection 2025.
2
Perplexing patterns of personality codevelopment: Findings from a 17-year longitudinal study of Mexican-origin families.人格共同发展的复杂模式:对墨西哥裔家庭进行的17年纵向研究的结果
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000561.
3
Optimism/pessimism and associations with life event perceptions.乐观主义/悲观主义及其与生活事件认知的关联。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 1;20(4):e0321128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321128. eCollection 2025.
4
Individual differences and personality traits across situations.不同情境下的个体差异和人格特质。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;12(2):109-119. doi: 10.5114/cipp/159942. eCollection 2024.
5
Trait and facet personality similarity and relationship and life satisfaction in romantic couples.浪漫情侣的特质与层面人格相似性、关系及生活满意度
J Res Pers. 2023 Jun;104. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104378. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
6
Effects of Reference Group Instructions on Big Five Trait Scores.参照群体指导对大五人格特质分数的影响。
Assessment. 2024 Apr;31(3):669-677. doi: 10.1177/10731911231175850. Epub 2023 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Trajectories of Big Five Personality Traits: A Coordinated Analysis of 16 Longitudinal Samples.大五人格特质的发展轨迹:对16个纵向样本的协同分析
Eur J Pers. 2020 May;34(3):301-321. doi: 10.1002/per.2259. Epub 2020 May 1.
2
Facet-level personality development in the transition to adolescence: Maturity, disruption, and gender differences.青少年期过渡阶段的面孔层面人格发展:成熟、破坏和性别差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Nov;121(5):1095-1111. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000367. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Age-related differences in actual-ideal personality trait level discrepancies.实际-理想人格特质水平差异的年龄相关差异。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Nov;35(7):1000-1015. doi: 10.1037/pag0000573. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
Stability and Change in Personality Traits and Major Life Goals From College to Midlife.人格特质和主要生活目标从大学到中年的稳定性和变化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 May;47(5):841-858. doi: 10.1177/0146167220949362. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
5
A facet atlas: Visualizing networks that describe the blends, cores, and peripheries of personality structure.一个面版图集:可视化描述人格结构的混合体、核心和外围的网络。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0236893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236893. eCollection 2020.
6
Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis.人格对心理和主观幸福感的预测:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;146(4):279-323. doi: 10.1037/bul0000226. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
7
Neurobiological Functioning and the Personality-Trait Hierarchy: Central Serotonergic Responsivity and the Stability Metatrait.神经生物学功能与人格特质层级:中枢血清素反应性与稳定性元特质。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Oct;30(10):1413-1423. doi: 10.1177/0956797619864530. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
Personality change: Longitudinal self-other agreement and convergence with retrospective-reports.人格改变:纵向的自我-他人一致性和与回溯报告的收敛。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 May;118(5):1065-1079. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000238. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
Does Openness to Experience matter in love and work? Domain, facet, and developmental evidence from a 24-year longitudinal study.开放性人格在爱情和工作中有影响吗?一项 24 年纵向研究的领域、方面和发展证据。
J Pers. 2019 Oct;87(5):1074-1092. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12458. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
10
The healthy personality from a basic trait perspective.从基本特质角度看健康人格。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jun;118(6):1207-1225. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000231. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

通过考察人格发展的各个方面、亲近他人和共同成长来完善成熟原则。

Refining the maturity principle of personality development by examining facets, close others, and comaturation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):942-958. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000400. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1037/pspp0000400
PMID:35025596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9480866/
Abstract

Across adulthood, people tend to experience psychologically adaptive personality trait change, a robust finding known as the maturity principle of personality development. We identify three open areas of inquiry regarding personality maturation and address them in a preregistered study, using a sample of U.S. adults ages 30-70 who completed a battery of personality questionnaires and were rated by two close others twice over an 11- to 16-year period ( = 1,785, = 401). First, it is unclear whether the maturity principle applies to narrower facet-level traits, as there has been little research into facet development across adulthood. We examined 47 facet scales and found that most developed adaptively across ages 30-70, but some did not mature, and three healthy facets (activity, openness to feelings, and social potency) declined significantly across adulthood, counter to the maturity principle. Second, no longitudinal research has tested whether personality maturation is perceived similarly by close others. We compared self- and other-rated development and found that close others perceived greater maturation than the self in Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and five facets. Finally, few studies have examined whether traits comature in adulthood. We found that correlated change between healthy facets was small in magnitude. Additionally, we found tighter comaturation in other-reported development than self-reported development. We use these results and past research to expand and refine our understanding of personality maturation across adulthood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

在成年期,人们往往会经历心理适应性的人格特质变化,这是一个被称为人格发展成熟原则的强有力发现。我们确定了人格成熟的三个开放性研究领域,并在一项预先注册的研究中对其进行了探讨,该研究使用了一组年龄在 30 至 70 岁的美国成年人的样本,他们在 11 至 16 年的时间内完成了一系列人格问卷,并由两位亲密的他人进行了两次评分(n = 1785,n = 401)。首先,成熟原则是否适用于更窄的特质层面尚不清楚,因为很少有研究探讨成年期特质的发展。我们研究了 47 个特质层面,发现大多数特质在 30 至 70 岁之间适应性地发展,但也有一些特质没有成熟,而三个健康的特质(活动、感受开放性和社交能力)在成年期显著下降,与成熟原则相悖。其次,没有纵向研究测试过人格成熟是否被亲密他人感知到相似。我们比较了自我和他人的评分发展,发现亲密他人在宜人性、尽责性、神经质和五个特质层面上比自我感知到更大的成熟。最后,很少有研究检验过成年期特质是否共同成熟。我们发现,健康特质之间相关的变化幅度很小。此外,我们发现他人报告的发展比自我报告的发展具有更紧密的共同成熟性。我们利用这些结果和过去的研究来扩展和完善我们对成年期人格成熟的理解。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。