School of Psychology, University of Sussex.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Apr;118(4):864-884. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000225. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
When people judge their lives as meaningful, what is this judgment about? Drawing on recent tripartite theoretical accounts of meaning in life (MIL), we tested the separate contributions of coherence (or comprehension), purpose, and existential mattering (or significance) as potential precursors of people's self-reported evaluations of MIL. In Study 1 (N = 314 social media users), we developed brief acquiescence-free measures of these constructs, confirming that sense of coherence, purpose, mattering, and MIL judgments were distinct from each other and from related constructs (sense of control, belonging, self-esteem, self-competence, mood). In Study 2 (N = 168 students) and Study 3 (N = 442 Prolific Academic respondents; preregistered), we collected longitudinal data to test temporal relationships between coherence, purpose, mattering, and MIL judgments over a 1-month time lag. In both studies, sense of mattering consistently emerged as a significant precursor of MIL judgments, whereas sense of purpose and coherence did not. We conclude that researchers and practitioners should pay more attention to the relatively neglected dimension of existential mattering, beyond their more common emphases on coherence or purpose as bases of meaningfulness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
当人们判断自己的生活有意义时,他们在评判什么?本研究借鉴了生命意义的最新三分理论观点(MIL),检验了作为人们对 MIL 自评的潜在预测因素的连贯性(或理解)、目的和存在意义(或重要性)的单独贡献。在研究 1(N=314 名社交媒体用户)中,我们开发了这些结构的简短、无需同意的衡量标准,证实了感知的连贯性、目的、意义和 MIL 判断彼此不同,且与其他相关结构(控制感、归属感、自尊、自我效能、情绪)也不同。在研究 2(N=168 名学生)和研究 3(N=442 名 Prolific Academic 受访者;预先注册)中,我们收集了纵向数据,以测试 1 个月的时间滞后内连贯性、目的、意义和 MIL 判断之间的时间关系。在这两项研究中,意义感始终是 MIL 判断的一个重要预测因素,而目的感和连贯性则不是。我们的结论是,研究人员和实践者应该更加关注相对被忽视的存在意义维度,而不仅仅是将连贯性或目的作为有意义的基础。(APA,所有权利保留)。