Suppr超能文献

最近的希氏-浦肯野系统起搏方法。

Recent approaches to His-Purkinje system pacing.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Jan 20;132(2):190-196. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000038.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Physiologic cardiac pacing is a novel technique which has been largely popularized in recent decades. His bundle pacing (HBP) has been long considered the most physiologic pacing method; however, with the widespread implementation of this method, its disadvantages have become apparent. In this context, left bundle branch pacing (LBBP)-directly engaged in the His-Purkinje system-has been foreseen as the best pacing method to mimic physiologic activation patterns. This review aimed to summarize recent approaches to physiologic cardiac pacing.

DATA SOURCES

This review included fully peer reviewed publications up to July 2018, found in the PubMed database using the keywords "His bundle branch pacing," "right ventricular pacing," and "physiologic pacing."

STUDY SELECTION

All selected articles were in English, with no restriction on study design.

RESULTS

The HBP has been studied worldwide, and is currently considered the most physiologic pacing method. However, it has disadvantages, such as high pacing threshold, unsatisfactory sensing and long procedure times, among others. Although LBBP is theoretically superior to HBP, the clinical relevance of this difference remains under debate, as few large randomized clinical trials with LBBP have been published.

CONCLUSIONS

Although HBP indeed appears to be the most physiologic pacing method, it has certain shortcomings, such as high pacing threshold, difficult implantation due to specific anatomic features, and others. Further studies are required to clarify the clinical significance of LBBP.

摘要

目的

生理性心脏起搏是一种新的技术,在近几十年来已经得到了广泛的普及。希氏束起搏(HBP)一直被认为是最生理性的起搏方法;然而,随着这种方法的广泛实施,其缺点变得明显。在这种情况下,直接作用于希氏-浦肯野系统的左束支起搏(LBBP)已被预见为模拟生理性激活模式的最佳起搏方法。本综述旨在总结最近的生理性心脏起搏方法。

资料来源

本综述纳入了截至 2018 年 7 月在 PubMed 数据库中使用关键词“希氏束起搏”、“右心室起搏”和“生理性起搏”检索到的所有同行评议的英文全文文献,无研究设计限制。

研究选择

所有入选文章均为英文,无研究设计限制。

结果

HBP 已在全球范围内进行了研究,目前被认为是最生理性的起搏方法。然而,它也存在一些缺点,如起搏阈值高、感知不良和程序时间长等。尽管 LBBP 在理论上优于 HBP,但这种差异的临床相关性仍存在争议,因为发表的关于 LBBP 的大型随机临床试验较少。

结论

尽管 HBP 确实是最生理性的起搏方法,但它也存在一些缺点,如起搏阈值高、由于特定的解剖特征导致植入困难等。需要进一步的研究来阐明 LBBP 的临床意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4d/6365279/692a0d75ae8f/cm9-132-190-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验