Suppr超能文献

左束支起搏

Left bundle branch pacing.

作者信息

Sundaram Shunmuga, Vijayaraman Pugazhendhi

机构信息

Velammal Medical college, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Cardiac Electrophysiology, Geisinger Heart Institute, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, MC 36-10, 1000 E Mountain Blvd, 18711, Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA.

出版信息

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2020 Jun;31(2):124-134. doi: 10.1007/s00399-020-00694-8. Epub 2020 May 26.

Abstract

Chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing has been associated with significant electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony leading to increased risk for recurrent heart failure hospitalizations and atrial arrhythmias. His bundle pacing (HBP) is an effective alternative to RV pacing as it is physiological and provides synchronized contraction of both ventricles. But there are limitations to HBP, which include lead stability, rise in threshold, early battery depletion and longer learning curve. Huang et al. recently reported a novel technique to directly capture the left bundle branch (LBB) by deep septal pacing. Subsequently, many studies have demonstrated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). This has the potential to overcome the limitations of HBP and provide a safe technique to capture the conduction system in patients with distal His bundle and proximal bundle branch disease. The criteria for LBB capture and the methodology to perform LBBP are discussed in detail in this review. The Medtronic SelectSecure®3830 pacing lead is used along with a fixed-curve C315His® or a deflectable C304His® sheath. LBBP provides safe and low threshold compared to HBP. Left bundle potential should be demonstrable in all patients except in those with infrahisian complete heart block (CHB) and complete left bundle branch block (LBBB), wherein antegrade activation of the left bundle will not occur. LBBP has the potential to be an effective alternative to biventricular pacing or HBP in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, LBBB and recurrent heart failure. Long-term safety and clinical outcomes compared to traditional pacing need to be carefully studied in randomized clinical trials.

摘要

慢性右心室起搏与显著的电和机械不同步有关,会导致反复发生心力衰竭住院和房性心律失常的风险增加。希氏束起搏(HBP)是右心室起搏的一种有效替代方法,因为它符合生理需求,可使双心室同步收缩。但HBP存在局限性,包括导线稳定性、阈值升高、电池早期耗尽以及学习曲线较长。Huang等人最近报道了一种通过深部间隔起搏直接激动左束支(LBB)的新技术。随后,许多研究证实了左束支起搏(LBBP)的可行性、安全性和有效性。这有可能克服HBP的局限性,并为患有远端希氏束和近端束支疾病的患者提供一种安全的激动传导系统的技术。本综述详细讨论了LBB激动的标准和进行LBBP的方法。美敦力SelectSecure®3830起搏导线与固定弯度的C315His®或可弯度的C304His®鞘管一起使用。与HBP相比,LBBP具有安全性高和阈值低的特点。除了患有希氏束下完全性心脏传导阻滞(CHB)和完全性左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的患者外,所有患者均应能显示左束支电位,因为在这些患者中左束支不会发生顺向激动。对于左心室功能不全、LBBB和反复发生心力衰竭的患者,LBBP有可能成为双心室起搏或HBP的有效替代方法。与传统起搏相比,其长期安全性和临床结果需要在随机临床试验中进行仔细研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验