Suppr超能文献

阿瑞匹坦和磷丙泊酚在儿科患者中的评估。

Evaluation of aprepitant and fosaprepitant in pediatric patients.

作者信息

Saito Yoshimasa, Kumamoto Tadashi, Arima Takamichi, Shirakawa Nami, Ishimaru Sae, Sonoda Tomoko, Nakajima Miho, Sugiyama Masanaka, Arakawa Ayumu, Hashimoto Hironobu, Makino Yoshinori, Ogawa Chitose, Yamaguchi Masakazu

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Pediatr Int. 2019 Mar;61(3):235-239. doi: 10.1111/ped.13780. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-dose i.v. fosaprepitant has been approved as an alternative to 3 day oral aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, and improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Because fosaprepitant has shown similar efficacy to aprepitant in adult patients only, this study compared the efficacy and safety of aprepitant and fosaprepitant in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Children younger than 18 years who received aprepitant or fosaprepitant to manage CINV between January 2015 and March 2018 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo) were recruited to this study. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no vomiting/rescue medication) between 0 and 120 h after the start of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints were safety based on the frequency of severe adverse events, and evaluation of patient characteristics as risk factors (effect of age and sex).

RESULTS

A total of 125 chemotherapy cycles were evaluated. In the aprepitant group, CR was observed in 36 of 80 treatment cycles (45.0%), whereas in the fosaprepitant group, it was observed in 19 of 45 cycles (42.2%; P = 0.852). No treatment-related severe adverse events were observed in either group. The number of non-CR was greater than that of CR in patients aged 6-14 years. The difference in CR rate between male and female patients was not statistically significant (47.1% vs 40.0%, respectively; P = 0.471).

CONCLUSIONS

Aprepitant and fosaprepitant were safely used and may be equally useful for pediatric patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. CR rate may be associated with patient age.

摘要

背景

单剂量静脉注射磷丙泊酚已被批准作为神经激肽-1受体拮抗剂阿瑞匹坦口服3天方案的替代方案,可改善化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的预防效果。由于磷丙泊酚仅在成年患者中显示出与阿瑞匹坦相似的疗效,本研究比较了阿瑞匹坦和磷丙泊酚在儿科患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

招募2015年1月至2018年3月在国立癌症中心医院(东京)接受阿瑞匹坦或磷丙泊酚治疗CINV的18岁以下儿童参与本研究。主要终点是化疗开始后0至120小时内的完全缓解(CR;无呕吐/急救药物)。次要终点是基于严重不良事件发生频率的安全性,以及将患者特征评估为危险因素(年龄和性别的影响)。

结果

共评估了125个化疗周期。在阿瑞匹坦组,80个治疗周期中有36个观察到CR(45.0%),而在磷丙泊酚组,45个周期中有19个观察到CR(42.2%;P = 0.852)。两组均未观察到与治疗相关的严重不良事件。6至14岁患者中未达到CR的人数多于达到CR的人数。男性和女性患者的CR率差异无统计学意义(分别为47.1%和40.0%;P = 0.471)。

结论

阿瑞匹坦和磷丙泊酚在儿科患者中使用安全,对于接受高致吐性化疗的儿科患者可能同样有效。CR率可能与患者年龄有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验