Foster C J, Butler P, Freer C E
Department of Cardiology, Manchester Royal Infirmary.
Br J Radiol. 1988 Nov;61(731):1009-13. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-61-731-1009.
Twenty-eight patients have been studied by left ventricular angiography and digital subtraction angiography, using either a peripheral venous injection (16) or a central venous injection (12) of contrast medium. Digital subtraction angiography compared favourably to angiography in the qualitative assessment of left ventricular size and function. Measurement of ejection fraction demonstrated a good correlation (r = 0.83) between digital subtraction angiography and left ventricular angiography. In the assessment of left ventricular segmental wall motion the use of a central venous injection, particularly in those patients with severely impaired ventricular function, proved superior to the use of a peripheral injection.
对28例患者进行了左心室血管造影和数字减影血管造影研究,造影剂采用外周静脉注射(16例)或中心静脉注射(12例)。在左心室大小和功能的定性评估中,数字减影血管造影与血管造影相比具有优势。射血分数测量显示数字减影血管造影与左心室血管造影之间具有良好的相关性(r = 0.83)。在评估左心室节段性室壁运动时,使用中心静脉注射,特别是在那些心室功能严重受损的患者中,证明优于外周注射。