O'Connor M K, Quigley P J, Gearty G F
Eur Heart J. 1984 Aug;5(8):652-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061722.
The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of left ventricular function (LVF). LVF was examined in 24 patients by three methods, (a) conventional ventriculography using an intraventricular injection (CLV) of 40 ml of contrast medium, (b) small volume (10-15 ml) left ventriculogram (SVLV) and (c) intravenous injection of 30 ml contrast medium (IVLV). Images were recorded via a conventional image intensifier--TV chain on to video tape and later analysed using a nuclear medicine computer with a digital interface. There was excellent correlation of ejection fraction and wall motion abnormalities between CLV and SVLV methods (r = 0.92 and r = 0.71, respectively) and good correlation between CLV and IVLV methods (r = 0.88 and r = 0.67, respectively). However, only minimal contrast induced premature ventricular contractions were observed in either the SVLV or IVLV methods compared with approximately 60% in the CLV method. Exclusion of studies containing ectopic cardiac cycles considerably improved the correlation between CLV and SVLV (r = 0.97) and between CLV and IVLV methods (r = 0.95). In conclusion, our results indicate that conventional left ventriculography may be replaced by either intravenous or small volume intraventricular methods with little loss of wall motion definition or error in ejection fraction estimation. The less invasive nature of the SVLV and IVLV methods should increase the usefulness of left ventriculography and extend its application to the assessment of left ventricular reserve under stress and during drug intervention.
本研究的目的是探讨数字减影血管造影在评估左心室功能(LVF)中的作用。采用三种方法对24例患者的左心室功能进行了检查:(a)经心室内注射40ml造影剂的传统心室造影(CLV);(b)小剂量(10 - 15ml)左心室造影(SVLV);(c)静脉注射30ml造影剂(IVLV)。通过传统影像增强器 - 电视系统将图像记录在录像带上,随后使用带有数字接口的核医学计算机进行分析。CLV与SVLV方法之间射血分数和室壁运动异常的相关性极佳(分别为r = 0.92和r = 0.71),CLV与IVLV方法之间的相关性良好(分别为r = 0.88和r = 0.67)。然而,与CLV方法中约60%的情况相比,在SVLV或IVLV方法中仅观察到极少的造影剂诱发的室性早搏。排除包含异位心动周期的研究后,CLV与SVLV之间(r = 0.97)以及CLV与IVLV方法之间(r = 0.95)的相关性显著提高。总之,我们的结果表明,传统左心室造影可以被静脉注射或小剂量心室内注射方法所取代,而在室壁运动清晰度或射血分数估计误差方面几乎没有损失。SVLV和IVLV方法侵入性较小的特点应会增加左心室造影的实用性,并将其应用扩展到应激状态下和药物干预期间左心室储备的评估。