Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Boston University, MA.
Physical Therapist Assistant Program, Northland Community and Technical College, East Grand Forks, MN.
J Athl Train. 2018 Nov;53(11):1071-1081. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46-16. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Weakness or decreased activation of the hip abductors and external rotators has been associated with lower extremity injury, especially in females. Resisted side stepping is commonly used to address hip weakness. Whereas multiple variations of this exercise are used clinically, few data exist regarding which variations to select.
To investigate differences in muscle-activation and movement patterns and determine kinematic and limb-specific differences between men and women during resisted side stepping with 3 resistive-band positions.
Controlled laboratory study.
Laboratory.
A total of 22 healthy adults (11 men, 11 women; age = 22.8 ± 3.0 years, height = 171.6 ± 10.7 cm, mass = 68.5 ± 11.8 kg).
INTERVENTION(S): Participants side stepped with the resistive band at 3 locations (knees, ankles, feet).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We collected surface electromyography of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and tensor fascia lata (TFL) for the moving and stance limbs during the concentric and eccentric phases. We also measured trunk inclination, hip and knee flexion, and hip-abduction excursion.
Hip-abductor activity was higher in women than in men ( P ≤ .04). The pattern of TFL activity in the stance limb differed by sex. Women performed the exercise in greater forward trunk inclination ( P = .009) and had greater hip excursion ( P = .003). Gluteus maximus and medius activity increased when the band was moved from the knees to the ankles and from the ankles to the feet, whereas TFL activity increased only when the band was moved from the knees to the ankles. Findings were similar for both the stance and moving limbs, but the magnitudes of the changes differed.
Compared with placing the band around the ankles, placing the band around the feet for resisted side stepping elicited more activity in the gluteal muscles without increasing TFL activity. This band placement is most appropriate when the therapeutic goal is to activate the muscles that resist hip adduction and internal rotation.
髋关节外展肌和外旋肌无力或激活不足与下肢损伤有关,尤其是在女性中。阻力侧步常用于解决髋关节无力的问题。尽管临床上使用了多种这种运动的变体,但关于选择哪种变体的数据很少。
研究在使用 3 种阻力带位置进行阻力侧步时,男性和女性之间肌肉激活和运动模式的差异,并确定运动学和肢体特异性差异。
对照实验室研究。
实验室。
共有 22 名健康成年人(11 名男性,11 名女性;年龄=22.8±3.0 岁,身高=171.6±10.7cm,体重=68.5±11.8kg)。
参与者在 3 个位置(膝盖、脚踝、脚部)使用阻力带进行侧步。
在向心和离心阶段,我们收集了移动和支撑腿的臀大肌、臀中肌和阔筋膜张肌的表面肌电图。我们还测量了躯干倾斜度、髋关节和膝关节屈曲度以及髋关节外展幅度。
女性的髋关节外展肌活性高于男性(P≤0.04)。支撑腿的 TFL 活性模式因性别而异。女性在更大的前躯干倾斜度(P=0.009)和更大的髋关节外展幅度(P=0.003)下进行运动。当带子从膝盖移动到脚踝,从脚踝移动到脚时,臀大肌和臀中肌的活动增加,而当带子从膝盖移动到脚踝时,TFL 活动增加。这些发现对支撑腿和移动腿都适用,但变化幅度不同。
与将带子放在脚踝周围相比,将带子放在脚周围进行阻力侧步可以在不增加 TFL 活性的情况下,更多地激活臀肌。当治疗目标是激活抵抗髋关节内收和内旋的肌肉时,这种带子放置是最合适的。