1 Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York.
2 Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
J Palliat Med. 2019 May;22(5):566-571. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0362. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Code status discussions (CSDs) can be challenging for many clinicians. Barriers associated with them include lack of education, comfort level, and experience. To conduct an educational intervention to improve knowledge and communication approaches related to CSDs. A cross-sectional multidisciplinary educational intervention was conducted over one year consisting of an interactive presentation, live role-play, and pre- and post-intervention tests to measure impact of the formal training. Evaluations and comments were also collected. Attending physicians, nurses, residents, fellows, and physician assistants (PAs) at an urban community teaching hospital of 500 beds serving an ethnically diverse population. Data from pre- and post-intervention tests evaluating knowledge and communication approach regarding CSDs were collected. Participants completed a qualitative evaluation of the program. There were 165 participants: 29 attending physicians, 26 residents, 17 fellows, 18 PAs, and 75 nurses. All (100%) completed the pre-intervention test and 154 (93.3%) completed the post-intervention test. There was an overall improvement in scores, 43.8% pre-intervention to 75.6% post-intervention (-values <0.005). Attending physicians and fellows had the highest pre-intervention scores, while nurses and PAs had the lowest. Most participants (97%) reported they learned new information and 91% stated they would change patient management. Our study found that a brief educational intervention with multipronged teaching tools improved knowledge concerning CSDs. Participants felt it provided new insights and would change their practice. This study contributes to the literature by examining CSD training across different disciplines, allowing for cross-group comparisons. Future studies should try to correlate educational interventions and clinician knowledge with clinical practice outcomes.
代码状态讨论(CSD)对许多临床医生来说可能具有挑战性。与之相关的障碍包括缺乏教育、舒适度和经验。为了进行教育干预,以提高与 CSD 相关的知识和沟通方法。在一年的时间里进行了一项跨学科的多学科教育干预,包括互动演示、现场角色扮演以及预干预和后干预测试,以衡量正式培训的影响。还收集了评估和意见。在一家拥有 500 张床位的城市社区教学医院工作的主治医生、护士、住院医师、研究员和医师助理(PA),为种族多样化的人群提供服务。收集了评估 CSD 相关知识和沟通方法的预干预和后干预测试的数据。参与者对该计划进行了定性评估。共有 165 名参与者:29 名主治医生、26 名住院医师、17 名研究员、18 名 PA 和 75 名护士。所有人(100%)都完成了预干预测试,154 人(93.3%)完成了后干预测试。分数总体有所提高,从干预前的 43.8%提高到干预后的 75.6%(-值<0.005)。主治医生和研究员的预干预得分最高,而护士和 PA 的得分最低。大多数参与者(97%)表示他们学习了新信息,91%表示他们将改变患者管理。我们的研究发现,一种具有多管齐下教学工具的简短教育干预提高了对 CSD 的认识。参与者认为它提供了新的见解,并将改变他们的实践。这项研究通过检查不同学科的 CSD 培训,允许进行跨组比较,为文献做出了贡献。未来的研究应尝试将教育干预和临床医生的知识与临床实践结果相关联。