Münch Lukas, Herbst Elmar, Dyrna Felix, Imhoff Florian B, Imhoff Andreas B, Beitzel Knut
Abteilung und Poliklinik für Sportorthopädie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2019 Oct;157(5):540-547. doi: 10.1055/a-0774-8272. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Reasons for failure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions are manifold and require a multifactorial explanatory approach. In addition to technical failures, many modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for a new ACL injury have to be considered. Technical failures primarily include non-anatomical tibial and femoral tunnel position. In comparison to the transtibial drilling technique, the tibial tunnel-independent technique results in a more anatomical position of the femoral tunnel and should therefore be preferred. One can differentiate between non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors. At the same time, the combination of more than one risk factor increases the risk of injury significantly. Non-modifiable risk factors include genetic predisposition, female sex, young age and ligament hyperlaxity. Young age at the time of the first injury is the most important risk factor for graft failure. Modifiable risk factors include high body mass index (BMI), deficits in jump landing mechanics, a steep posterior tibial slope and narrow intercondylar notch width. Neuromuscular training or additional surgical procedures modify these risk factors and reduce the probability of further injuries. A high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is the surgical procedure of choice for a reduction in the posterior tibial slope and anterior tibial translation. In case of a tibial slope over 12°, this procedure should be considered. In revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with remaining anterolateral rotatory instability, additional lateral extraarticular tenodesis should be taken into account. This is also recommended for patients participating in pivoting sports, having concomitant hyperlaxity or additional injury of peripheral structures with insufficiency of the ACL. In addition, the surface of the pitch can be modified and thus influence the risk of an ACL injury. In summary, a substantiated failure analysis is required to initiate specific and individualised therapy - not only in the case of ACL rerupture. These factors should already be considered in risk assessment during patient information.
前交叉韧带(ACL)重建失败的原因是多方面的,需要采用多因素解释方法。除技术失误外,还必须考虑许多导致新的ACL损伤的可改变和不可改变的风险因素。技术失误主要包括胫骨和股骨隧道位置不解剖。与经胫骨钻孔技术相比,独立于胫骨隧道的技术可使股骨隧道位置更接近解剖位置,因此应优先选择。风险因素可分为不可改变和可改变的两类。同时,多种风险因素并存会显著增加损伤风险。不可改变的风险因素包括遗传易感性、女性性别、年轻和韧带过度松弛。首次受伤时年龄较小是移植物失败的最重要风险因素。可改变的风险因素包括高体重指数(BMI)、跳跃着陆力学缺陷、胫骨后倾坡度大以及髁间窝宽度窄。神经肌肉训练或额外的手术操作可改变这些风险因素,降低进一步受伤的概率。高位胫骨截骨术(HTO)是减少胫骨后倾坡度和胫骨前移的首选手术方法。如果胫骨坡度超过12°,应考虑该手术。在伴有前外侧旋转不稳定的前交叉韧带翻修重建中,应考虑附加外侧关节外肌腱固定术。对于参与旋转运动、伴有过度松弛或周围结构有额外损伤且ACL功能不全的患者,也建议采用此方法。此外,可对场地表面进行改造,从而影响ACL损伤的风险。总之,需要进行充分的失败分析以启动特定的个体化治疗——不仅在ACL再次断裂的情况下。在患者咨询过程中的风险评估中就应考虑这些因素。