Department of Gynecological Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, 1 Banshan East Road, Hangzhou, 310022, People's Republic of China.
Department of Agriculture and Food Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Lin'an, 311300, People's Republic of China.
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5147-2.
Neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (NECC) is a rare but aggressive form of cervical cancer representing less than 3% of all cervical cancer cases. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of the clinicopathologic features and treatment modalities on the survival of patients with NECC.
In all, 89 stage I-IV patients with NECC that were diagnosed and treated between 2006 and 2014 at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital were retrospectively recruited in this study. The Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression analysis models and the log-rank test were used for the statistical analyses.
NECC patients with advanced FIGO stage, tumor size > 4 cm, lymph node metastasis (LNM) and lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) were more likely to have significantly worse survival. Neither neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) nor radiotherapy (RT) was associated with improved overall survival. In the stratified analysis of stage I-IIA patients, those with advanced FIGO stage (P = 0.018), LNM (P = 0.008) and LVSI (P = 0.024) were associated with significantly worse survival. Patients without LNM who did not receive RT had significantly better survival rates than those who received RT (HR = 3.363, 95%CI = 1.245-10.619; P = 0.018). Moreover, for stage I-IIA patients with tumor size > 4 cm, NACT was not associated with a significantly better survival rate compared with no NACT (P = 0.600). None of the clinicopathologic features or treatment modalities was an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis.
In conclusion, advanced FIGO stage, tumor size > 4 cm, LNM and LVSI were associated with poor survival. For stage I-IIA patients, RT should be carefully used in patients who are negative for LNM, and NACT may not be the optimal treatment for patients with tumor size > 4 cm.
神经内分泌宫颈癌(NECC)是一种罕见但侵袭性的宫颈癌,占所有宫颈癌病例的比例不到 3%。本研究旨在评估临床病理特征和治疗方式对 NECC 患者生存的影响。
本研究回顾性纳入了 2006 年至 2014 年期间在浙江省肿瘤医院诊断和治疗的 89 例 I-IV 期 NECC 患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法、Cox 回归分析模型和对数秩检验进行统计学分析。
FIGO 分期较晚、肿瘤直径>4cm、淋巴结转移(LNM)和脉管间隙浸润(LVSI)的 NECC 患者生存更差。新辅助化疗(NACT)和放疗(RT)均与总生存改善无关。在 I-IIA 期患者的分层分析中,FIGO 分期较晚(P=0.018)、LNM(P=0.008)和 LVSI(P=0.024)与生存显著相关。无 LNM 且未接受 RT 的患者生存明显优于接受 RT 的患者(HR=3.363,95%CI=1.245-10.619;P=0.018)。此外,对于肿瘤直径>4cm 的 I-IIA 期患者,NACT 与无 NACT 相比,生存率无显著差异(P=0.600)。在多因素分析中,没有任何临床病理特征或治疗方式是独立的预后因素。
综上所述,FIGO 分期较晚、肿瘤直径>4cm、LNM 和 LVSI 与生存不良相关。对于 I-IIA 期患者,LNM 阴性患者应谨慎使用 RT,而肿瘤直径>4cm 的患者 NACT 可能不是最佳治疗方法。