BACKGROUND

To explore the beneficial subgroups after radiotherapy in high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer (HGNECC) and construct two survival prognosis models to quantify the efficacy of radiotherapy assessment.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 592 eligible samples from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 56 patients with lymph-node positive HGNECC from Chongqing Medical University. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent survival prognosis risk factors for HGNECC patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed as it balances the baseline differences among grouping methods. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves were used to analyze survival differences among different groups. Two survival prediction nomograms were constructed separately (using the "rms" package in R software) based on whether radiotherapy was administered. The stability and accuracy of these models were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves in both the training and validation datasets. P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

Age, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)-stage, and treatment methods (surgery vs. chemotherapy) were independent risk factors that affected survival prognosis (P<0.05). Radiotherapy showed adverse effects on survival in patients with early tumor staging, lymph-node negative status, and absence of distant metastasis (all P<0.05). The lymph-node positive group had a beneficial response to radiotherapy (P<0.05), and patients with metastasis in the radiotherapy group showed a survival protection trend (P=0.069).

CONCLUSION

In HGNECC, patients with lymph-node positive status can benefit from radiotherapy in terms of survival outcomes. We constructed two survival prediction models based on whether radiotherapy was administered, thereby offering a more scientifically guided approach to clinical treatment planning by quantifying the radiotherapy efficacy.