Suppr超能文献

书面知情同意是否充分告知手术患者?一项横断面研究。

Does written informed consent adequately inform surgical patients? A cross sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Medicine, Campania University L. Vanvitelli, Section of Hygiene Via L. Armanni 5, 80138, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jan 7;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0340-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Informed consent (IC) is an essential step in helping patients be aware of consequences of their treatment decisions. With surgery, it is vitally important for patients to understand the risks and benefits of the procedure and decide accordingly. We explored whether a written IC form was provided to patients; whether they read and signed it; whether they communicated orally with the physician; whether these communications influenced patient decisions.

METHODS

Adult postsurgical patients in nine general hospitals of Italy's Campania Region were interviewed via a structured questionnaire between the second and seventh day after the surgery at the end of the first surgical follow up visit. Physicians who were independent from the surgical team administered the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The written IC form was given to 84.5% of those interviewed. All recipients of the form signed it, either personally or through a delegate; however, 13.9% did not know/remember having done so; 51.8% said that they read it thoroughly. Of those who reported to have read it, 90.9% judged it to be clear. Of those receiving the written consent form, 52.0% had gotten it the day before the surgery at the earliest 41.1% received it some hours or immediately before the procedure. The written IC form was explained to 65.6% of the patients, and 93.9% of them received further oral information that deemed understandable. Most attention was given to the diagnosis and the type of surgical procedure, which was communicated respectively to 92.8 and 88.2% of the patients. Almost one in two patients believed that the information provided some emotional relief, while 23.2% experienced increased anxiety. Younger patients (age ≤ 60) and patients with higher levels of education were more likely to read the written IC form.

CONCLUSIONS

The written IC form is not sufficient in assuring patients and making them fully aware of choices they made for their health; pre-operative information that was delivered orally better served the patients' needs. To improve the quality of communication we suggest enhancing physicians' communication skills and for them to use structured conversation to ensure that individuals are completely informed before undergoing their procedures.

摘要

背景

知情同意(IC)是帮助患者了解其治疗决策后果的重要步骤。对于手术而言,患者了解手术的风险和益处并据此做出决定至关重要。我们探讨了是否向患者提供了书面 IC 表格;他们是否阅读并签署了表格;他们是否与医生进行了口头沟通;这些沟通是否影响了患者的决策。

方法

意大利坎帕尼亚地区 9 家综合医院的成年术后患者在术后第 2 天至第 7 天,在第一次手术随访结束时,通过结构化问卷接受采访。独立于手术团队的医生进行了问卷调查。

结果

接受采访的患者中,84.5%的人收到了书面 IC 表格。所有收到表格的人都亲自或通过代表签署了表格;然而,13.9%的人表示不知道/不记得已经签署;51.8%的人表示他们已仔细阅读。在表示已阅读的人当中,90.9%的人认为表格内容清晰易懂。在收到书面同意书的人中,52.0%的人是在手术前一天最早收到的,41.1%的人是在手术前几小时或立即收到的。65.6%的患者收到了书面 IC 表格的解释,其中 93.9%的患者收到了他们认为可以理解的进一步口头信息。大多数患者关注的是诊断和手术类型,分别有 92.8%和 88.2%的患者获得了相关信息。近一半的患者认为提供的信息在某种程度上缓解了他们的情绪压力,而 23.2%的患者感到更加焦虑。年轻患者(年龄≤60 岁)和受教育程度较高的患者更有可能阅读书面 IC 表格。

结论

书面 IC 表格并不能确保患者充分了解他们为自己的健康所做的选择;而口头提供的术前信息则更好地满足了患者的需求。为了提高沟通质量,我们建议增强医生的沟通技巧,并使用结构化对话确保在患者接受手术前完全知情。

相似文献

5
Improving comprehension of informed consent.提高对知情同意书的理解。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.009. Epub 2006 Jan 20.
9
The quality of obtaining surgical informed consent.获取手术知情同意书的质量。
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Mar;24(2):167-176. doi: 10.1177/0969733015584398. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

9
Artificial Intelligence-Powered Surgical Consent: Patient Insights.人工智能驱动的手术同意书:患者见解
Cureus. 2024 Aug 29;16(8):e68134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68134. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

10
The nocebo effect of informed consent.知情同意的反安慰剂效应。
Bioethics. 2014 Mar;28(3):147-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01983.x. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验