• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会预后分期系统对三阴性乳腺癌的预测价值:一项 SEER 基于人群的分析。

The predictive value of the prognostic staging system in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer for triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER population-based analysis.

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, PR China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, PR China.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2019 Feb;15(4):391-400. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0145. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

DOI:10.2217/fon-2018-0145
PMID:30620221
Abstract

AIM

To examine the stage changes and survival differences among triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients based on the prognostic staging system.

METHODS

We used the SEER database to identify eligible patients with TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn for comparison. The primary end point was breast cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 26 months for 19,608 patients. The stages of all TNBC patients increased or remained unchanged during rearrangement from anatomic staging to prognostic staging. Stage IIA, IIIA and IIIC comprised the majority of patients. Several patients did not have prognostic staging. Stage IIIC incorporated six substages that contributed to high heterogeneity. Overall, the Kaplan-Meier curves still showed the favorable differentiation among stages and substages, with the exception of stage IIB and substage IIIA (T2N0, grade 2-3) patients.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic information for breast cancer patients provided by the novel prognostic staging system may be less accurate for TNBC patients in our independent analysis. Moreover, stage IIB and substage IIIA (T2N0, grade 2-3) should possibly undergo further evaluation.

摘要

目的

基于预后分期系统,研究三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者的分期变化和生存差异。

方法

我们使用 SEER 数据库,确定了 2010 年至 2014 年间诊断为 TNBC 的合格患者。绘制 Kaplan-Meier 曲线进行比较。主要终点是乳腺癌特异性生存。

结果

19608 例患者的中位随访时间为 26 个月。所有 TNBC 患者的分期在从解剖分期到预后分期的重新排列过程中增加或保持不变。IIA、IIIA 和 IIIC 期占大多数患者。部分患者没有进行预后分期。IIIC 期包含六个亚期,导致高度异质性。总体而言,除了 IIB 期和 IIIA 亚期(T2N0、G2-3)患者外,Kaplan-Meier 曲线仍显示出各分期和亚期之间的良好分化。

结论

在我们的独立分析中,新型预后分期系统为乳腺癌患者提供的预后信息可能对 TNBC 患者不够准确。此外,IIB 期和亚期 IIIA(T2N0、G2-3)可能需要进一步评估。

相似文献

1
The predictive value of the prognostic staging system in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer for triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER population-based analysis.第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会预后分期系统对三阴性乳腺癌的预测价值:一项 SEER 基于人群的分析。
Future Oncol. 2019 Feb;15(4):391-400. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0145. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
Validation of the Prognostic Significance of the Prognostic Stage Group According to the Eighth Edition of American Cancer Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Analysis From Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 Database.基于美国癌症联合委员会第八版癌症分期系统的预后分期组对三阴性乳腺癌预后意义的验证:来自监测、流行病学和最终结果 18 数据库的分析。
J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:211-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.072. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Evaluation of the prognostic stage in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer in locally advanced breast cancer: An analysis based on SEER 18 database.第八版美国癌症联合委员会肿瘤分期系统在局部晚期乳腺癌中的预后评估:基于 SEER18 数据库的分析。
Breast. 2018 Feb;37:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
4
Assessment of the external validity of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for anal carcinoma.美国癌症联合委员会第八版肛管癌分期系统的外部效度评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 May;34(5):923-929. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1441817. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
The assessment of 8th edition AJCC prognostic staging system and a simplified staging system for breast cancer: The analytic results from the SEER database.第8版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)乳腺癌预后分期系统及简化分期系统的评估:来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的分析结果
Breast J. 2019 Sep;25(5):838-847. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13347. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
6
Triple-negative breast cancer has worse overall survival and cause-specific survival than non-triple-negative breast cancer.三阴性乳腺癌的总生存率和病因特异性生存率均低于非三阴性乳腺癌。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;161(2):279-287. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4059-6. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
7
AJCC 8th edition prognostic staging provides no better discriminatory ability in prognosis than anatomical staging in triple negative breast cancer.AJCC 8th 版预后分期在三阴性乳腺癌中的预后判别能力并不优于解剖分期。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6494-3.
8
The prognostic value of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in triple-negative breast cancer.第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统在三阴性乳腺癌中的预后价值。
Neoplasma. 2019 Sep;66(5):810-817. doi: 10.4149/neo_2019_190107N26. Epub 2019 May 11.
9
Validation of the pathological prognostic staging system proposed in the revised eighth edition of the AJCC staging manual in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer.验证修订版第八版 AJCC 分期手册中不同乳腺癌分子亚型的病理预后分期系统。
Virchows Arch. 2019 Feb;474(2):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s00428-018-2495-x. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
10
Validation of the AJCC 8th lung cancer staging system among patients with small cell lung cancer.AJCC 第 8 版肺癌分期系统在小细胞肺癌患者中的验证。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2018 Apr;20(4):550-556. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1739-6. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning for survival prediction in triple-negative breast cancer: development and validation in real-world cohorts.深度学习用于三阴性乳腺癌的生存预测:在真实世界队列中的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 18;15(1):30248. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16331-8.
2
Burden of Disease and Cost of Illness of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Portugal.葡萄牙三阴性乳腺癌的疾病负担和疾病成本
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 May;9(3):423-431. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00552-0. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
3
Triple-negative breast cancer outcomes: Does AJCC 8th staging improve chemotherapy decision-making.
三阴性乳腺癌结局:第 8 版 AJCC 分期是否改善化疗决策。
Breast. 2021 Oct;59:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
4
Staging for Breast Cancer With Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes Metastasis: Utility of Incorporating Biologic Factors.伴有内乳淋巴结转移的乳腺癌分期:纳入生物学因素的效用
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 14;10:584009. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.584009. eCollection 2020.
5
Integration the biologic factors into the staging of breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis.将生物学因素纳入同侧锁骨上淋巴结转移乳腺癌患者的分期。
J Cancer. 2020 Sep 30;11(23):6834-6840. doi: 10.7150/jca.52449. eCollection 2020.
6
AJCC 8th edition prognostic staging provides no better discriminatory ability in prognosis than anatomical staging in triple negative breast cancer.AJCC 8th 版预后分期在三阴性乳腺癌中的预后判别能力并不优于解剖分期。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6494-3.
7
Validation of the AJCC prognostic stage for HER2-positive breast cancer in the ShortHER trial.ShortHER 试验中 AJCC 预后分期对 HER2 阳性乳腺癌的验证。
BMC Med. 2019 Nov 21;17(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1445-z.