Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Jan;21(1):44-50. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0295.
This study assessed subcutaneous absorption kinetics of rapid-acting insulin administered as a bolus using bolus delivery speeds commonly employed in commercially available insulin pumps (i.e., 2 and 40 s for delivering 1 insulin unit).
Twenty C-peptide-negative type 1 diabetic subjects were studied on two occasions, separated by at least 7 days, using the euglycemic clamp procedure. After an overnight fast, subjects were given, in random order, a subcutaneous insulin bolus (15 U of insulin lispro, Eli Lilly) either for 30 s using an Animas IR2020 pump (fast bolus delivery) or for 10 min using a Medtronic Minimed Paradigm 512 pump (slow bolus delivery).
Fast bolus delivery resulted in an earlier onset of insulin action as compared with slow bolus delivery (21.0 ± 2.5 vs. 34.3 ± 2.7 min; P < 0.002). Furthermore, time to reach maximum insulin effect was found to be 27 min earlier with fast bolus delivery as compared with slow bolus delivery (98 ± 11 vs. 125 ± 16 min; P < 0.005). In addition, the area under the plasma insulin curve from 0 to 60 min for fast bolus delivery was greater than the one for slow bolus delivery (10,307 ± 1291 vs. 8192 ± 865 min·pmol/L; P = 0.027).
Results suggest that insulin bolus delivery with fast delivery speed may result in more rapid insulin absorption and, thus, may provide a better control of meal-related glucose excursions than that obtained with bolus delivery using slow delivery speeds. Our findings may have important implications for the future design of the bolus delivery unit of insulin pumps.
本研究评估了使用商业胰岛素泵中常用的推注输送速度(即输送 1 个胰岛素单位用时 2 秒或 40 秒)进行推注时,速效胰岛素的皮下吸收动力学。
20 名 C 肽阴性的 1 型糖尿病患者在两次试验中接受了研究,两次试验之间至少间隔 7 天,使用了正葡萄糖钳夹程序。在隔夜禁食后,受试者以随机顺序分别接受皮下胰岛素推注(15U 赖脯胰岛素,礼来),一次使用 Animas IR2020 泵(快速推注输送),用时 30 秒,一次使用 Medtronic Minimed Paradigm 512 泵(缓慢推注输送),用时 10 分钟。
与缓慢推注输送相比,快速推注输送更早地引发了胰岛素作用(21.0±2.5 分钟 vs. 34.3±2.7 分钟;P<0.002)。此外,与缓慢推注输送相比,快速推注输送时达到最大胰岛素效应的时间早了 27 分钟(98±11 分钟 vs. 125±16 分钟;P<0.005)。此外,快速推注输送的 0 至 60 分钟内血浆胰岛素曲线下面积大于缓慢推注输送(10307±1291 分钟·pmol/L vs. 8192±865 分钟·pmol/L;P=0.027)。
结果表明,使用快速输送速度进行胰岛素推注输送可能会导致更快的胰岛素吸收,从而可能比使用缓慢输送速度进行推注输送更好地控制与进餐相关的血糖波动。我们的发现可能对胰岛素泵推注输送单元的未来设计具有重要意义。