Pyo Se-Wook, Lim Young-Jun, Koo Ki-Tae, Lee Jungwon
Department of Dentistry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea.
Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 7;8(1):54. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010054.
The purpose of this review is to examine various assessment methods in order to compare the accuracy between the virtually planned and clinically achieved implant positions. In this review, comparison methods using pre- and post-operative computed topography (CT) data and digital impressions for definitive prosthesis will be described. The method for the displacement and strain for quantification of the error will also be explored. The difference between the planned and the actual implant placement position in guided implant surgery is expressed as an error. Assessing the accuracy of implant-guided surgery can play an important role as positive feedback in order to reduce errors. All of the assessment methods have their own inevitable errors and require careful interpretation in evaluation.
本综述的目的是研究各种评估方法，以比较虚拟计划的种植体位置与临床实际实现的位置之间的准确性。在本综述中，将描述使用术前和术后计算机断层扫描（CT）数据以及用于最终修复体的数字印模的比较方法。还将探讨用于量化误差的位移和应变方法。在引导种植手术中，计划种植体位置与实际种植体位置之间的差异表示为误差。评估种植体引导手术的准确性作为减少误差的积极反馈可发挥重要作用。所有评估方法都有其不可避免的误差，在评估中需要仔细解读。
Zotero 插件
