Suppr超能文献

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导异常患者的死亡率和心力衰竭住院率。

Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients With Conduction Abnormalities After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 14;12(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.053.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess mortality and rehospitalization in patients with new bundle branch block (BBB) and/or permanent pacemaker (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have provided inconsistent results on the clinical impact of new BBB or new PPM after TAVR.

METHODS

A total of 816 consecutive patients without pre-procedural BBB or PPM undergoing TAVR between 2007 and 2017 were followed for 5 years or until data extraction in September 2017. Data on vital status and hospitalization were obtained through national registries.

RESULTS

Within 30 days post-TAVR, new BBB without PPM and new PPM occurred in 247 (30.3%) and 132 (16.2%) patients, respectively, leaving 437 patients (53.6%) without conduction abnormalities. Median follow-up was 2.5 years (interquartile range: 1.0 to 4.9 years). One-year all-cause mortality was increased for new BBB (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18 to 3.67) but not for new PPM (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.72 to 3.74) compared with patients with no conduction abnormalities. The risk for late all-cause mortality (≥1 year after TAVR) was higher both for patients with new BBB (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.24 to 2.59) and for those with new PPM (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.46) compared with patients with no conduction abnormalities. Patients with new BBB (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.12) and new PPM (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.54) had a higher risk for heart failure hospitalization and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.0001 for both groups) during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

New BBB and new PPM developed frequently after TAVR. New BBB was associated with increased early and late all-cause mortality, whereas new PPM was associated with late all-cause mortality. Furthermore, both new BBB and new PPM increased the risk for heart failure hospitalizations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后新发束支传导阻滞(BBB)和/或永久性起搏器(PPM)患者的死亡率和再入院率。

背景

先前的研究对 TAVR 后新发 BBB 或新 PPM 的临床影响提供了不一致的结果。

方法

共纳入 816 例 2007 年至 2017 年间行 TAVR 且术前无 BBB 或 PPM 的连续患者,随访 5 年或直至 2017 年 9 月数据提取。通过国家登记处获取生存状态和住院数据。

结果

TAVR 后 30 天内,新发无 PPM 的 BBB 和新发 PPM 分别发生在 247 例(30.3%)和 132 例(16.2%)患者中,其余 437 例(53.6%)患者无传导异常。中位随访时间为 2.5 年(四分位距:1.0 至 4.9 年)。新发 BBB 患者的 1 年全因死亡率升高(风险比 [HR]:2.80;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.18 至 3.67),但新发 PPM 患者(HR:1.64;95% CI:0.72 至 3.74)则无此变化。与无传导异常患者相比,新发 BBB (HR:1.79;95% CI:1.24 至 2.59)和新发 PPM (HR:1.58;95% CI:1.01 至 2.46)患者的晚期全因死亡率(TAVR 后≥1 年)风险更高。新发 BBB (HR:1.47;95% CI:1.02 至 2.12)和新发 PPM (HR:1.66;95% CI:1.09 至 2.54)患者在随访期间因心力衰竭住院和左心室射血分数降低的风险更高(两组 p 值均<0.0001)。

结论

TAVR 后新发 BBB 和 PPM 较为常见。新发 BBB 与早期和晚期全因死亡率升高相关,而新发 PPM 则与晚期全因死亡率升高相关。此外,新发 BBB 和新发 PPM 均增加心力衰竭住院的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验