Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1056. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
: media-1vid110.1542/5972296744001PEDS-VA_2018-1056 OBJECTIVES: To characterize and compare ambulatory antibiotic prescribing for children in US pediatric and nonpediatric emergency departments (EDs).
A cross-sectional retrospective study of patients aged 0 to 17 years discharged from EDs in the United States was conducted by using the 2009-2014 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ED data. We estimated the proportion of ED visits resulting in antibiotic prescriptions, stratified by antibiotic spectrum, class, diagnosis, and ED type ("pediatric" defined as >75% of visits by patients aged 0-17 years, versus "nonpediatric"). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors independently associated with first-line, guideline-concordant prescribing for acute otitis media, pharyngitis, and sinusitis.
In 2009-2014, of the 29 million mean annual ED visits by children, 14% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10%-20%) occurred at pediatric EDs. Antibiotics overall were prescribed more frequently in nonpediatric than pediatric ED visits (24% vs 20%, < .01). Antibiotic prescribing frequencies were stable over time. Of all antibiotics prescribed, 44% (95% CI: 42%-45%) were broad spectrum, and 32% (95% CI: 30%-34%, 2.1 million per year) were generally not indicated. Compared with pediatric EDs, nonpediatric EDs had a higher frequency of prescribing macrolides (18% vs 8%, < .0001) and a lower frequency of first-line, guideline-concordant prescribing for the respiratory conditions studied (77% vs 87%, < .001).
Children are prescribed almost 7 million antibiotic prescriptions in EDs annually, primarily in nonpediatric EDs. Pediatric antibiotic stewardship efforts should expand to nonpediatric EDs nationwide, particularly regarding avoidance of antibiotic prescribing for conditions for which antibiotics are not indicated, reducing macrolide prescriptions, and increasing first-line, guideline-concordant prescribing.
描述并比较美国儿科和非儿科急诊部(ED)为儿童开具的门诊抗生素处方。
本研究为一项在美国进行的横断面回顾性研究,使用了 2009-2014 年全国医院门诊医疗调查 ED 数据,研究对象为年龄在 0 至 17 岁之间从 ED 出院的患者。我们根据抗生素谱、类别、诊断和 ED 类型(“儿科”定义为 75%以上的就诊患者年龄在 0-17 岁,而“非儿科”),估计导致抗生素处方的 ED 就诊比例。采用多变量逻辑回归确定与急性中耳炎、咽炎和鼻窦炎一线、符合指南的处方相关的独立因素。
在 2009-2014 年,每年约有 2900 万例儿童平均 ED 就诊量中,14%(95%置信区间[CI]:10%-20%)发生在儿科 ED。与儿科 ED 就诊相比,非儿科 ED 就诊中抗生素的开具频率更高(24% vs. 20%, <.01)。抗生素的开具频率在一段时间内保持稳定。所有开具的抗生素中,44%(95% CI:42%-45%)为广谱抗生素,每年约有 3200 万例抗生素(32%,95% CI:30%-34%)通常不适用。与儿科 ED 相比,非儿科 ED 开具大环内酯类药物的频率更高(18% vs. 8%, <.0001),且对于所研究的呼吸道疾病,遵循指南的一线抗生素处方开具率更低(77% vs. 87%, <.001)。
每年有近 700 万例儿童在 ED 开具抗生素处方,主要在非儿科 ED 开具。应在全国范围内扩大儿科抗生素管理计划,包括避免开具不适用抗生素的处方,减少大环内酯类药物的开具,以及增加遵循指南的一线抗生素处方。